Yotam Perlitz, Elron Bandel, Ariel Gera, Ofir Arviv, Liat Ein-Dor, Eyal Shnarch, Noam Slonim, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Leshem Choshen
| Challenge: | Efficient Benchmarking is a method for reducing computation costs of LM evaluation without compromising reliability. |
| Approach: | They propose to reduce the computation costs of LM evaluation without compromising reliability by using a new measure - Decision Impact on Reliability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks reduce computation costs by x100 or more, while maintaining reliability. |
Similar Papers
LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and Efficient (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Peiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang, Yueqi Zhang, Jiayi Shi, Chuyi Tan, Boyuan Pan, Yao Hu, Kan Li
| Challenge: | Using generic and efficient benchmark generators, human annotators are limited by inefficiency . current benchmark generator methods rely on seed signals, leading to long cycles and high costs . |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to evaluate LLMs as generic benchmark generators and integrate them as BenchMaker. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves comparable performance to human-annotated benchmarks on most metrics. |
The BiGGen Bench: A Principled Benchmark for Fine-grained Evaluation of Language Models with Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Seungone Kim, Juyoung Suk, Ji Yong Cho, Shayne Longpre, Chaeeun Kim, Dongkeun Yoon, Guijin Son, Yejin Cho, Sheikh Shafayat, Jinheon Baek, Sue Hyun Park, Hyeonbin Hwang, Jinkyung Jo, Hyowon Cho, Haebin Shin, Seongyun Lee, Hanseok Oh, Noah Lee, Namgyu Ho, Se June Joo, Miyoung Ko, Yoonjoo Lee, Hyungjoo Chae, Jamin Shin, Joel Jang, Seonghyeon Ye, Bill Yuchen Lin, Sean Welleck, Graham Neubig, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee, Minjoon Seo
| Challenge: | a recent study evaluated language models using abstract evaluation criteria that lack the flexibility and granularity of human assessment. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate nine distinct language models' capabilities . they use instance-specific evaluation criteria to mirror human evaluation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates nine distinct capabilities of language models across 77 tasks. |
LangProBe: a Language Program Benchmark (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Shangyin Tan, Lakshya A Agrawal, Arnav Singhvi, Liheng Lai, Michael J Ryan, Dan Klein, Omar Khattab, Koushik Sen, Matei Zaharia
| Challenge: | Composing language models into multi-step language programs is a mainstream paradigm for building AI systems, but tradeoffs in this space have only scarcely been studied before. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmarking tool to evaluate the architectures and optimization strategies for language programs . they find that optimized language programs offer strong cost-quality Pareto improvement . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates the impact of program architectures and optimizers on quality and cost. |
In Benchmarks We Trust ... Or Not? (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ine Gevers, Victor De Marez, Jens Van Nooten, Jens Lemmens, Andriy Kosar, Ehsan Lotfi, Nikolay Banar, Pieter Fivez, Luna De Bruyne, Walter Daelemans
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for Large Language Models (LLMs) are inadequate and lack a clear solution. |
| Approach: | They propose checklists to cover all aspects of benchmarking issues, both for benchmark creation and usage. |
| Outcome: | The proposed checklists cover all aspects of benchmarking issues, both for benchmark creation and usage. |
EffiVLM-BENCH: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Training-Free Acceleration in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for accelerating Large Vision-Language Models lack comprehensive evaluation across diverse backbones, benchmarks, and metrics. |
| Approach: | They propose EffiVLM-BENCH framework for evaluating absolute performance and generalization and loyalty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework offers insights into optimal strategies for accelerating LVLMs. |
SLM-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Small Language Models on Environmental Impacts (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | SLMs offer computational efficiency and accessibility, yet a systematic evaluation of their performance and environmental impact remains lacking. |
| Approach: | SLM-Bench evaluates 15 SLMs on 9 NLP tasks using 23 datasets . compared accuracy, computational efficiency, and sustainability metrics . |
| Outcome: | SLM-Bench evaluates 15 SLMs on 9 NLP tasks using 23 datasets spanning 14 domains. |
Anchor Points: Benchmarking Models with Much Fewer Examples (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern language models exhibit powerful but brittle behavior, leading to larger and more diverse benchmarks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use anchor points to select small subsets of a language model-prompt dataset to capture model behavior across the entire dataset. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique outperforms standard benchmarks in language models with 1-30 anchor points . the proposed technique can be used to compare models on different regions of the dataset . |
BenchMAX: A Comprehensive Multilingual Evaluation Suite for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing multilingual benchmarks focus primarily on language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They develop a multi-way multilingual benchmark that measures critical capabilities of large language models across languages. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments on BenchMAX reveal uneven utilization of core capabilities across languages, emphasizing the performance gaps that scaling model size alone does not resolve. |
E-Bench: Towards Evaluating the Ease-of-Use of Large Language Models (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | E-Bench is a framework for easy-to-use research on large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the ease-of-use of large language models and construct an E-Bench . they simulate human use from synonymous and typographical perturbations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to resist synonymous expressions and typos and improves performance. |
Navigating the Modern Evaluation Landscape: Considerations in Benchmarks and Frameworks for Large Language Models (LLMs) (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | General-purpose Language Models have changed the world of Natural Language Processing, if not the world itself. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will lay the foundations and explain the basics of evaluation and compare traditional methods to newly developed methods. |
| Outcome: | The tutorial assumes little familiarity with metrics, datasets, prompts and benchmarks . it will compare traditional methods to newly developed methods . |