Challenge: We compare webcam-based eye-tracking recordings with human-annotated rationales to evaluate importance scores.
Approach: They compare webcam-based eye-tracking recordings with attention-based importance scores for 4 different multilingual Transformer-based language models.
Outcome: The proposed method is comparable to human rationales in linguistic analysis.

Similar Papers

ChartGaze: Enhancing Chart Understanding in LVLMs with Eye-Tracking Guided Attention Refinement (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Chart question answering (CQA) is a key research challenge for large vision-language models . recent efforts focus on leveraging LVLMs directly on chart images .
Approach: They propose a gaze-guided attention refinement that aligns image-text attention with human fixations to improve chart reasoning quality and interpretability.
Outcome: The proposed approach improves answer accuracy and attention alignment yielding gains of up to 2.56 percentage points across multiple models.
From Human Reading to NLM Understanding: Evaluating the Role of Eye-Tracking Data in Encoder-Based Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: integrating eye-tracking features into Neural Language Models does not degrade downstream task performance, enhances alignment between model attention and human attention patterns, and compresses the embedding space.
Approach: They used eye-gaze data from the Ghent Eye-Tracking Corpus to investigate how integrating knowledge of human reading behavior impacts Neural Language Models.
Outcome: The proposed approach does not degrade downstream task performance, enhances alignment between model attention and human attention patterns, and compresses the embedding space.
Measuring the Impact of (Psycho-)Linguistic and Readability Features and Their Spill Over Effects on the Prediction of Eye Movement Patterns (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work to predict gaze patterns during naturalistic reading has not been conducted on general text characteristics.
Approach: They propose to use two eye-tracking corpora of naturalistic reading and two language models to test their performance.
Outcome: The proposed models predict eye-tracking measures during naturalistic reading and language processing.
Analyzing Interpretability of Summarization Model with Eye-gaze Information (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have provided saliency scores for neural summarization models . eye-gaze information is often used as a proxy for human attention in reading tasks .
Approach: They propose to compare model saliency to human eye-gaze data to determine whether it conforms to human gaze during summarization.
Outcome: The proposed framework compares the model behavior to human summarization performance.
Classifying Referential and Non-referential It Using Gaze (D18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a particular problem for anaphora resolution systems is the pronoun it, which can be used both referentially and non-referentially.
Approach: They use eye-tracking data to learn how humans perform disambiguation and use it to improve automatic classification.
Outcome: The proposed system outperforms a baseline and outperformed linguistic-based approaches.
Does Listener Gaze in Face-to-Face Interaction Follow the Entropy Rate Constancy Principle: An Empirical Study (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies have shown that nonverbal behaviours are rich in communicative functions, such as gaze, head movements, and speech-accompanying manual gestures.
Approach: They train a transformer-based neural sequence model to process gaze data extracted from video-recorded conversations and compute its information density.
Outcome: The proposed model computes listeners’ gaze behaviour and the information density of speech using a pre-trained language model.
At a Glance: The Impact of Gaze Aggregation Views on Syntactic Tagging (D19-64)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work uses gaze data at the type level or at the token level and mostly from a single eye-tracking corpus.
Approach: They propose to use gaze data to capture central tendency or variability of gaze data and to integrate binary phrase chunking and part-of-speech tagging.
Outcome: The proposed approaches capture the central tendency or variability of gaze data better than proposed local views which retain individual participant information.
Eye Movement Features Can Predict Human Preferences on Machine-Generated Texts (2026.acl-srw)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on eye movement in text quality assessment are limited . eye-movement features are important predictors of human judgments of text quality, but are costly and inconsistent.
Approach: They propose to capture eye-movement features during screen reading of LLM-generated text using a dataset that includes eye-motion recordings, reading-time measurements, and post-reading evaluations.
Outcome: The proposed dataset shows that eye-movement features can significantly improve models over other probabilistic metrics, including negative log-likelihood (NLL).
Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-text Rationales (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing metrics like task performance of the LM generating the rationales or similarity between generated and gold rationale are not good indicators of their human utility.
Approach: They propose to use a large language model to generate rationales with better human utility by estimating its conciseness and novelty.
Outcome: The proposed model can measure human utility to a better extent by estimating its usefulness in answering similar unseen instances.
AERA Chat: An Interactive Platform for Automated Explainable Student Answer Assessment (2025.emnlp-demos)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing systems that use pretrained language models to score student answers are noisy and unreliable.
Approach: They propose a visualization platform for automated student answer assessment that leverages multiple LLMs to generate rationales.
Outcome: The proposed platform enables educators to mark tasks and researchers to evaluate rationale quality from different models.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations