Beyond Code: Evaluate Thought Steps for Complex Code Generation (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing efforts to generate code in C++ rely on relatively simple programming problems . large language models (LLMs) pre-trained on numerous code data have opened up new opportunities for code generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a task that evaluates the quality of thought steps and code implementation . they construct a dataset of complex programming problems in C++ . |
| Outcome: | The proposed task evaluates the quality of thought steps and code implementation in a C++ programming language. |
Similar Papers
CoCoST: Automatic Complex Code Generation with Online Searching and Correctness Testing (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to improve code generation from natural language descriptions are difficult due to complex structure, subtle bugs, and lack of supplementary contents. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that enhances complex code generation by online searching for more information with planned queries and correctness testing for code refinement. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the quality of complex code generation on the DS-1000 and ClassEval datasets. |
CodeJudge: Evaluating Code Generation with Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promising performance in code generation, but how to reliably evaluate code generated by LLMs remains a challenging problem. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that leverages Large Language Models to evaluate the semantic correctness of generated code without the need for test cases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on four code generation datasets and five programming languages. |
CodeSim: Multi-Agent Code Generation and Problem Solving through Simulation-Driven Planning and Debugging (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant strides in code generation and problem solving. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-agent code generation framework that integrates human-like perception to address the stages of program synthesis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art (pass@1) results and shows potential for even greater enhancement when cascaded with external debuggers. |
CodeIF: Benchmarking the Instruction-Following Capabilities of Large Language Models for Code Generation (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | CodeIF assesses the ability of large language models to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks. |
| Approach: | They introduce a benchmark designed to assess LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions within diverse code generation scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses LLMs' ability to adhere to task-oriented instructions in code generation tasks across a wide range of complexity levels and programming domains. |
CodeExp: Explanatory Code Document Generation (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Haotian Cui, Chenglong Wang, Junjie Huang, Jeevana Priya Inala, Todd Mytkowicz, Bo Wang, Jianfeng Gao, Nan Duan
| Challenge: | Existing code-to-text generation models produce only high-level code summaries that do not capture implementation-level choices essential for these scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a code explanation generation task that uses code docstrings to refine models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate well-structured long docstrings comparable to human-written ones. |
StepCoder: Improving Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from Compiler Feedback (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shihan Dou, Yan Liu, Haoxiang Jia, Enyu Zhou, Limao Xiong, Junjie Shan, Caishuang Huang, Xiao Wang, Xiaoran Fan, Zhiheng Xi, Yuhao Zhou, Tao Ji, Rui Zheng, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang
| Challenge: | Existing work integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality but the long code generated by LLMs makes RL exploration ineffective. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates reinforcement learning and compiler feedback to enhance code generation quality. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks and integrates reinforcement learning with compiler feedback to improve code generation quality. |
Revisit Self-Debugging with Self-Generated Tests for Code Generation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiancai Chen, Zhengwei Tao, Kechi Zhang, Changzhi Zhou, Xinyu Zhang, Wanli Gu, Yuanpeng He, Mengdi Zhang, Xunliang Cai, Haiyan Zhao, Zhi Jin
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have made significant advances in code generation, but they still face challenges when tackling complex programming tasks beyond their basic capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate self-generated tests into the code generation process . they propose to use post-execution and in-exection self-debugging to mitigate test bias . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the performance of large language models in code generation tasks by leveraging execution feedback from tests. |
Enhancing Code Generation Performance of Smaller Models by Distilling the Reasoning Ability of LLMs (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant advances in code generation through the ‘Chain-of-Thought’ prompting technique. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which aims to transfer LLMs’ reasoning capabilities to smaller models through distillation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the smaller model's code generation performance by over 130% on the APPS benchmark. |
The Program Testing Ability of Large Language Models for Code (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent development of large language models (LLMs) for code shows promise in achieving code intelligence. |
| Approach: | They explore the ability of large language models to generate automated test cases . they show +11.77% and +4.22% higher code pass rates on HumanEval+ . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show higher pass rates on humanEval+ compared with the current state-of-the-art models. |
CodeContests-O: Powering LLMs via Feedback-Driven Iterative Test Case Generation (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Jianfeng Cai, Jinhua Zhu, Ruopei Sun, Kangwen Zhao, Dongyun Xue, Mingxiao Feng, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang Li
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to synthesize test cases using Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on the model’s intrinsic generation capabilities without external feedback, resulting in insufficiently diverse cases. |
| Approach: | They propose a feedback-driven iterative framework that leverages Large Language Models to generate initial test cases, execute them against known correct and incorrect solutions, and utilizes the failed results as feedback to guide the LLM in refining the test cases toward high fidelity and discriminability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the existing codecontests and codecontests+ models by 4.30% and 8.78%. |