Challenge: Existing approaches to simulating opinion dynamics often over-simplify human behavior . authors propose refining LLMs with real-world discourse to better simulate evolution of beliefs .
Approach: They propose to use large language models to simulate opinion dynamics in groups of simulated agents . they found that LLM agents produce more accurate information than ABMs .
Outcome: The proposed model can be used to better simulate opinion dynamics in real-world discourses.

Similar Papers

Systematic Biases in LLM Simulations of Debates (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Current research suggests that LLM-based agents become increasingly human-like in their performance, sparking interest in using these AI agents as substitutes for human participants in behavioral studies.
Approach: They propose to use LLMs to simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes.
Outcome: The proposed model can simulate political debates on topics that are important aspects of people’s day-to-day lives and decision-making processes.
From Heard to Lived Opinions: Simulating Opinion Dynamics with Grounded LLM Agents in Economic Environments (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on opinion dynamics (OD) focus primarily on opinion exchange, with opinion change driven by linguistic interaction.
Approach: They propose a OD simulation framework that grounds LLM-based agents in an economic environment and allows them to act and receive environmental feedback.
Outcome: The proposed framework shows that LLM-based agents can act and receive environmental feedback at both individual and population levels while generating larger distributional shifts.
An Empirical Study of Group Conformity in Multi-Agent Systems (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled multi-agent systems that simulate real-world interactions with near-human reasoning.
Approach: They analyze how LLM agents shape public opinion through debates on five contentious topics by simulating over 2,500 debates.
Outcome: The proposed models show that LLM agents adopt specific stances over time and align with numerically dominant groups or more intelligent agents, exerting a greater influence.
Biases in Opinion Dynamics in Multi-Agent Systems of Large Language Models: A Case Study on Funding Allocation (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: We identify biases that drive the exchange of opinions based on the LLM’s tendency to find consensus with the other LLM's opinion, display caution when specifying funding, and consider ethical concerns in its opinion.
Approach: They identify biases that drive the exchange of opinions based on the LLM’s tendency to find consensus with the other LLM's opinion, display caution when specifying funding, and consider ethical concerns in its opinion.
Outcome: The proposed model can be used to predict the evolution of opinions in large language models.
AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods of peer review analysis do not address multivariate nature of the process, account for latent variables, and are constrained by privacy concerns due to the sensitive nature of data.
Approach: They propose a large language model based peer review simulation framework which effectively disentangles the impacts of multiple latent factors and addresses the privacy issue.
Outcome: The proposed framework disentangles the impacts of multiple latent factors and addresses privacy concerns.
Bias in the Mirror : Are LLMs opinions robust to their own adversarial attacks (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work on large language models lacks robustness, highlighting the limitations of such models.
Approach: They propose a novel approach where two LLMs engage in self-debate to persuade a neutral version of the model.
Outcome: The proposed approach examines whether large language models are robust during interactions and whether they are susceptible to reinforcing misinformation or shifting to harmful viewpoints.
Biased LLMs can Influence Political Decision-Making (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have found that biased LLMs can influence decisions in areas such as medical classifications and educational hiring.
Approach: They conducted two interactive experiments on partisan bias in large language models while completing tasks with either a biased liberal, biased conservative, or unbiased control model.
Outcome: The results show that prior knowledge of AI is weakly correlated with a reduction of the bias, suggesting that AI education can be crucial for mitigating bias effects.
Mind the (Belief) Gap: Group Identity in the World of LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Social biases and belief-driven behaviors can significantly impact Large Language Models’ (LLMs) decisions on several tasks.
Approach: They propose a multi-agent framework that simulates belief congruence, a group psychology theory that plays a crucial role in shaping societal interactions and preferences.
Outcome: The proposed framework reduces misinformation dissemination and improves learning by 11% while reducing misinformation dissemination by up to 37%.
A Survey on LLM-powered Agents for Recommender Systems (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding, reasoning, and generation.
Approach: They present a comprehensive synthesis of large language models and their applications . they dissect a four-module agent architecture and review representative designs .
Outcome: The proposed models address fundamental challenges in traditional recommender systems . they include limited comprehension of complex user intents, insufficient interaction capabilities .
Aligning Language Models to User Opinions (2023.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Personality is a defining feature of human beings, shaped by a complex interplay of demographic characteristics, moral principles, and social experiences.
Approach: They use public opinion surveys to model past user opinions in addition to user demographics and ideology to achieve up to 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from survey questions.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves 7 points accuracy gains in predicting public opinions from public opinion surveys across a broad set of topics.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations