I’m sure you’re a real scholar yourself: Exploring Ironic Content Generation by Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Moreover, irony is highly subjective and can depend on various factors, such as social, cultural, or generational aspects. |
| Approach: | They propose to fine-tune two large language models to generate ironic and non-ironic content and analyze their outputs from a linguistic perspective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generate ironic and non-ironic responses to a given social media post and analyze their outputs from a linguistic perspective. |
Similar Papers
A Survey in Automatic Irony Processing: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Multi-X Perspectives (2022.coling-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | figurative language research has focused on sarcasm and irony, but there is still a gap in the field. |
| Approach: | They propose to review computational irony, cognitive science, and neural models of irony processing . they aim to encourage a balanced and equal research environment in figurative languages . |
| Outcome: | The proposed multi-X irony processing perspectives will provide an overview of computational irony, insights from linguisic theory and cognitive science, and interactions with downstream NLP tasks. |
Decision Biases and Intent-Irony Decoupling in Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive linguistic fluency, but it remains unclear whether they possess human-like Theory of Mind (ToM) or rely on statistical heuristics . a recent study examined the performance of LLMs against 300 human participants . |
| Approach: | a study establishes a framework for large language models that modulates contextual contrast, linguistic cues, and cognitive mechanisms. |
| Outcome: | a new evaluation framework compares ten state-of-the-art LLMs against 300 human participants . the framework systematically modulates contextual contrast, linguistic cues, and cognitive mechanisms . |
LLMs in Sarcasm Detection? It’s elementary! (Or is it?) (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are often cited for their sophisticated pragmatic reasoning, but they collapse to random guessing on organic human speech. |
| Approach: | They propose that LLMs have near-human competence in sarcasm detection . authors propose that this proficiency may be deceptive . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performance on synthetic leaderboards is a statistical mirage of competence. |
A Survey of Pun Generation: Datasets, Evaluations and Methodologies (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pun generation aims to modify linguistic elements in text to produce humour or evoke double meanings. |
| Approach: | They propose to review pun generation datasets and methods across different stages . pun generation aims to produce humour or evoke double meanings . |
| Outcome: | This paper summarises both automated and human evaluation metrics used to assess the quality of pun generation. |
Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Survey (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in the capacity of large language models to generate human-like text have prompted a heated discourse around the risks of societal harms they introduce. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy of interventions organized around the different phases where they can be adopted to mitigate harms. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are based on several prior works’ taxonomies of language model risks and provide an overview of strategies for detecting and ameliorating different kinds of risks/harms. |
LLM generated responses to mitigate the impact of hate speech (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Jakub Podolak, Szymon Łukasik, Paweł Balawender, Jan Ossowski, Jan Piotrowski, Katarzyna Bakowicz, Piotr Sankowski
| Challenge: | a study aims to determine the effectiveness of large language models to counteract hate speech . it is the first real-life A/B test evaluating the effectiveness . |
| Approach: | They conduct the first real-life A/B test assessing the effectiveness of LLM-generated counter-speech. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system reduces user engagement by over 20%, the study shows . the proposed metric is based on a simple metric and is scalable to other platforms . |
A Survey on LLMs for Story Generation (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Maria Teleki, Vedangi Bengali, Xiangjue Dong, Sai Tejas Janjur, Haoran Liu, Tian Liu, Cong Wang, Ting Liu, Yin Zhang, Frank Shipman, James Caverlee
| Challenge: | Methods for story generation with Large Language Models (LLMs) have come into the spotlight recently. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel taxonomy of LLMs for story generation consisting of two major paradigms: independent story generation by an LLM, and author-assistance for story creation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy compares existing work on the topic with those of novel author-assistance models. |
Tackling Irony Detection using Ensemble Classifiers (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automated approaches to irony detection still fall short of what one would consider desirable performance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use transformer-based approaches to automate irony detection in social media . they propose to augmentation training data to address the binary and fine-grained problem . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve performance over baselines and are not decisive for good results. |
Attribution, Citation, and Quotation: A Survey of Evidence-based Text Generation with Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have raised concerns about reliability and trustworthiness of the models. |
| Approach: | They analyze 134 papers and introduce a taxonomy of evidence-based text generation with LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods highlight open challenges and outline promising directions for future work. |
Should a Chatbot be Sarcastic? Understanding User Preferences Towards Sarcasm Generation (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | sarcasm generation research focused on creating more human-like interactions . previous research focused only on how to generate text that people perceive as sarkastic . |
| Approach: | They propose a theory-driven framework for generating sarcastic responses that allows us to control linguistic devices included during generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework allows us to control the linguistic devices included during generation. |