Divide and Conquer: Legal Concept-guided Criminal Court View Generation (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for creating rationales for criminal cases do not pay enough attention to the important legal concepts. |
| Approach: | They propose a legal concept-guided court view generation framework that generates rationales based on predicted legal concepts . they first divide the court view into sub-views, then employ a solver and verifier to generate and select rationale. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generates coherent and coherent court views on a real-world criminal case dataset. |
Similar Papers
Unleashing the Power of LLMs in Court View Generation by Stimulating Internal Knowledge and Incorporating External Knowledge (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable strides in language generation, but they encounter difficulties in the knowledge-intensive legal domain. |
| Approach: | They propose to decompose court views into different parts, stimulate internal knowledge, and incorporate external information to unleash the power of LLMs in the task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates more accurate and reliable court views on two real-world datasets LAIC2021 and CJO2022. |
Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on court view generation from fact descriptions has improved the working efficiency of legal assistant systems. |
| Approach: | They propose to decode court views conditioned on encoded charge labels from the fact description in a criminal case to improve interpretability of charge prediction systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate court views conditioned on encoded charge labels. |
LegalChainReasoner: Grounding Criminal Judicial Opinion Generation via Structured Legal Chains (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current legalAI tasks divide sentencing and legal reasoning into two separate tasks, resulting in inconsistency between the reasoning and predictions. |
| Approach: | They propose a new task that generates both legal reasoning and sentencing decisions using a framework that applies structured legal chains to guide the model through comprehensive case assessments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models on real-world, open-source Chinese legal case datasets. |
DefGen-Bench: A Benchmark for Chinese Criminal Defence Opinion Generation in LegalAI (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LegalAI tasks are descriptive or predictive, requiring the users to translate the information into legal reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a task to generate a structured defence opinion conditioned jointly on an indictment and the defendant’s stated opinion, which often present conflicting claims. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves on eight large language models (LLMs) and shows that it is more efficient than previous approaches. |
De-Biased Court’s View Generation with Causality (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Yiquan Wu, Kun Kuang, Yating Zhang, Xiaozhong Liu, Changlong Sun, Jun Xiao, Yueting Zhuang, Luo Si, Fei Wu
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to court’s view generation can be used to address this problem, but neglecting the confounding bias in data can limit the model performance and pollute learning outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel Attentional and Counterfactual based Natural Language Generation method consisting of an attentional encoder and a pair of innovative counterfactual decoders to generate judgment-discriminative court's views. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is able to generate judgment-discriminative court's views (both supportive and non-supportive views) under both quantitative and qualitative evaluation metrics. |
Enhancing Court View Generation with Knowledge Injection and Guidance (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods of natural language generation (NLG) rely on the extensive parameters of pretrained language models (PLMs) but their effectiveness may be compromised by insufficient domain-specific knowledge. |
| Approach: | They propose a knowledge-injected prompt encoder to incorporate domain knowledge during the training stage, thereby reducing computational overhead. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms established baselines on real-world data in responsivity of claims and in the ability to transfer domain knowledge. |
Agenda-Driven Question Generation: A Case Study in the Courtroom Domain (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing automated question generation methods focus on unstructured text and lack agenda and background documents as context. |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage large language models for CourtQG by fine-tuning them on two auxiliary tasks, agenda explanation and question type prediction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method generates better questions according to standard metrics when compared to several baselines. |
LexGenie: Automated Generation of Structured Reports for European Court of Human Rights Case Law (2025.acl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent efforts focus on automatic summarization of individual cases, which condense the content of a single case, making it easier for legal professionals to grasp key points. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline to generate multi-case structured reports using entire body of case law on user-specified topics within the European Court of Human Rights. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline generates structured reports that enhance efficient, scalable legal analysis. |
Courtroom-LLM: A Legal-Inspired Multi-LLM Framework for Resolving Ambiguous Text Classifications (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using a multi-LLM structure inspired by legal courtroom processes, we demonstrate that it can improve decision-making accuracy in ambiguous text classification scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a legal-inspired multi-LLM structure that simulates a courtroom setting within LLMs and assigns roles similar to those of prosecutors, defense attorneys, and judges. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms both single-LLM classifiers and simpler multi-LLMS setups in ambiguous text classification tasks. |
CLEAR: A Framework Enabling Large Language Models to Discern Confusing Legal Paragraphs (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work focuses on enabling LLMs to leverage legal rules to tackle complex legal reasoning tasks, but ignores their ability to understand legal rules. |
| Approach: | They propose a legal paragraph prediction task that aims to predict the legal paragraph given criminal facts and a framework CLEAR to enhance their legal reasoning ability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves the ability of LLMs to analyze legal cases with the guidance of legal rule insights. |