Mirror-Consistency: Harnessing Inconsistency in Majority Voting (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are a widely-used decoding strategy that relies on the plurality voting rule, which focuses on the most frequent answer while overlooking all other minority responses. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate a ‘reflective mirror’ into the self-ensemble decoding process and enables LLMs to critically examine inconsistencies among multiple generations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method incorporates a ‘reflective mirror’ into the self-ensemble decoding process and enables LLMs to critically examine inconsistencies among multiple generations. |
Similar Papers
Mirror: Multiple-perspective Self-Reflection Method for Knowledge-rich Reasoning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) struggle with knowledge-rich problems without external resources. |
| Approach: | They propose a Multiple-perspective self-reflection method that allows LLMs to reflect from multiple-perceptive clues, achieved through a heuristic interaction between a Navigator and a Reasoner. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is superior to other self-reflection methods on five reasoning datasets. |
Confidence Improves Self-Consistency in LLMs (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities, driven in part by their capacity to generate a sequence of intermediate reasoning steps that lead them toward a final answer. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that performs a weighted majority vote based on confidence scores obtained directly from the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms self-consistency on nine models and four datasets, reducing the required number of reasoning paths by over 40% on average. |
Bias in the Mirror : Are LLMs opinions robust to their own adversarial attacks (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on large language models lacks robustness, highlighting the limitations of such models. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach where two LLMs engage in self-debate to persuade a neutral version of the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach examines whether large language models are robust during interactions and whether they are susceptible to reinforcing misinformation or shifting to harmful viewpoints. |
Self-Contrast: Better Reflection Through Inconsistent Solving Perspectives (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent research indicates without external feedback, LLM’s intrinsic reflection is unstable. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that combines self-evaluated and external feedback to improve LLM's reflection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves the quality of self-evaluated feedback and can catalyze more accurate and stable reflection. |
Too Consistent to Detect: A Study of Self-Consistent Errors in LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Hexiang Tan, Fei Sun, Sha Liu, Du Su, Qi Cao, Xin Chen, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Yuanzhuo Wang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
| Challenge: | Existing detection methods fail to account for **self-consistent error** . study identifies self-consistency errors and evaluates them . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that fuses hidden state evidence from an external verifier LLM to detect self-consistent errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly enhances performance on self-consistent errors across three LLM families. |
Calibrating Long-form Generations From Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Conventional calibration methods treat answer correctness as binary and do not work for long-form generation where an answer can be partially correct. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework where correctness of LLMs' responses and associated confidence levels are treated as distributions across a range of scores. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework treats the correctness of the LLMs’ responses and their associated confidence levels as distributions across a range of scores. |
Ranked Voting based Self-Consistency of Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing majority voting methods generate only a single answer in each trial, ignoring the possibility of other possible answers. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate ranked answers in each reasoning process and conduct ranked voting among multiple ranked responses from different responses. |
| Outcome: | Extensive experiments show that the proposed method outperforms baselines on multiple-choice and open-ended questions. |
Self-Para-Consistency: Improving Reasoning Tasks at Low Cost for Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that self-consistency decoding can improve performance for complex reasoning tasks with large language models. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-consistency decoding strategy that generates multiple paraphrases for each test question and then generates reasoning paths for the original and all the paraphrased questions based on greedy decoding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed strategy reduces the sampling number and improves performance on complex reasoning tasks. |
To Mask or to Mirror: Human-AI Alignment in Collective Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to model and augment collective decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for assessing collective alignment using the Lost at Sea social psychology task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework compares LLMs with human-AI alignment on the Lost at Sea social psychology task. |
Self-Ensemble: Mitigating Confidence Distortion for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models exhibit a confidence distortion problem on multichoice question-answering . Self-Ensemble solves this problem by splitting the choices into several groups . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that splits LLM choices into several groups and ensembles them to reach a final decision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms standard inference and baseline methods on MCQA. |