Automatic Bug Detection in LLM-Powered Text-Based Games Using LLMs (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Advancements in large language models (LLMs) are revolutionizing interactive game design, but they may exhibit flaws such as hallucinations, forgetfulness, or misinterpretation of prompts. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for automatically identifying LLM bugs from player game logs . their method surpasses unstructured bug-catching methods and fills the gap . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method surpasses unstructured bug-catching methods and fills the gap in detection of logical and design flaws. |
Similar Papers
Tricking LLMs into Disobedience: Formalizing, Analyzing, and Detecting Jailbreaks (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to jailbreak large language models have been poorly studied . a recent study showed that non-expert users can jailbreak LLMs by manipulating their prompts . |
| Approach: | They propose a formalism and a taxonomy of known (and possible) jailbreaks . they propose generating a dataset of model outputs across 3700 jailbreak prompts a 'prompt' attack is a new attack popularly categorized as "prompting injection attacks" |
| Outcome: | The proposed model exploits 3700 jailbreak prompts over 4 tasks to analyze their effectiveness . authors show that the model can learn to perform a new task on unseen examples . |
A Survey on Detection of LLMs-Generated Content (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Xianjun Yang, Liangming Pan, Xuandong Zhao, Haifeng Chen, Linda Petzold, William Yang Wang, Wei Cheng
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models have led to an increase in synthetic content generation . the ability to detect LLMs-generated content has become of paramount importance . |
| Approach: | They propose to provide a detailed overview of existing detection strategies and benchmarks, scrutinizing their differences and advocating for more adaptable and robust models to enhance detection accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be able to detect human-written content in real time. |
Knowing What LLMs DO NOT Know: A Simple Yet Effective Self-Detection Method (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yukun Zhao, Lingyong Yan, Weiwei Sun, Guoliang Xing, Chong Meng, Shuaiqiang Wang, Zhicong Cheng, Zhaochun Ren, Dawei Yin
| Challenge: | Recent literature reveals that Large Language Models (LLMs) hallucinate intermittently, which impedes their reliability for further utilization. |
| Approach: | They propose a self-detection method to detect which questions an LLM does not know by combining the two components to identify whether the model generates a non-factual response to the question. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can detect which questions an LLM does not know across factoid question-answering, arithmetic reasoning, and commonsense reasoning tasks. |
Beat LLMs at Their Own Game: Zero-Shot LLM-Generated Text Detection via Querying ChatGPT (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Biru Zhu, Lifan Yuan, Ganqu Cui, Yangyi Chen, Chong Fu, Bingxiang He, Yangdong Deng, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Ming Gu
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are capable of performing tasks but are likely to be misused. |
| Approach: | They propose a zero-shot black-box method to detect LLM-generated texts . they revise the text to be detected using the ChatGPT model . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can detect LLM-generated texts with a zero-shot black-box model . it is based on intuition that the model will make fewer revisions to LLMs than to human-written texts . |
DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Runchu Tian, Yining Ye, Yujia Qin, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin, Yinxu Pan, Yesai Wu, Hui Haotian, Liu Weichuan, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional coding capabilities, but their debugging capabilities remain relatively unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a debugging benchmark consisting of 4,253 LLMs with four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. |
Deciphering Digital Detectives: Understanding LLM Behaviors and Capabilities in Multi-Agent Mystery Games (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this study, we explore the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in Jubensha, a Chinese detective role-playing game and a novel area in Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven gaming. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to foster AI agent development in Jubensha, a Chinese detective role-playing game. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework enables AI agents to engage in Jubensha games autonomously. |
Sanitizing Large Language Models in Bug Detection with Data-Flow (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have potential in code reasoning tasks but the hallucination effect can compromise the reliability of bug reports. |
| Approach: | They propose a new schema of bug detection that enforces LLMs to emit data-flow paths in few-shot chain-of-thought prompting and validates them via the program-property decomposition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves 91.03% precision and 74.00% recall upon synthetic benchmarks and boosts precision by 21.99% with the sanitization. |
AutoDetect: Towards a Unified Framework for Automated Weakness Detection in Large Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Jiale Cheng, Yida Lu, Xiaotao Gu, Pei Ke, Xiao Liu, Yuxiao Dong, Hongning Wang, Jie Tang, Minlie Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit significant but subtle weaknesses, such as mistakes in instruction-following or coding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to automatically expose weaknesses in Large Language Models (LLMs) they use three LLM-powered agents to perform comprehensive weakness identification . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that it is more effective than untargeted data augmentation methods like Self-Instruct to identify weaknesses in LLMs. |
Towards Understanding Jailbreak Attacks in LLMs: A Representation Space Analysis (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to a type of attack known as jailbreaking, which misleads LLMs to output harmful contents. |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage hidden representations into existing jailbreak targets to move the attacks along the acceptance direction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are validated using the objective of existing jailbreak attacks. |
AD-LLM: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Anomaly Detection (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Tiankai Yang, Yi Nian, Li Li, Ruiyao Xu, Yuangang Li, Jiaqi Li, Zhuo Xiao, Xiyang Hu, Ryan A. Rossi, Kaize Ding, Xia Hu, Yue Zhao
| Challenge: | Anomaly detection (AD) is an important machine learning task with many real-world uses, including fraud detection, medical diagnosis, and industrial monitoring. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates how large language models (LLMs) can help with NLP anomaly detection. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can perform zero-shot detection without tasks-specific training, data augmentation and model selection, and it can suggest unsupervised AD models. |