Looking Right is Sometimes Right: Investigating the Capabilities of Decoder-only LLMs for Sequence Labeling (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models excel in natural language understanding (NLU) tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to apply layer-dependent removal of the causal mask (CM) during LLM fine-tuning to improve SL performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art SL models on IE tasks, while achieving state- of-the art results is unclear. |
Similar Papers
Causal2Vec: Improving Decoder-only LLMs as Embedding Models through a Contextual Token (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods modify attention mechanism to be bidirectional, undermining LLMs’ ability to extract semantic information acquired during pre-training. |
| Approach: | They propose a general-purpose embedding model that pre-encodes input text into a single Contextual token and then prepends it to the LLM's input sequence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance of decoder-only large language models without altering their architectures or introducing significant computational overhead. |
LLMs Can Also Do Well! Breaking Barriers in Semantic Role Labeling via Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Semantic role labeling (SRL) is a crucial task of natural language processing (NLP). |
| Approach: | They propose to equip LLMs with retrieval-augmented generation and self-correction mechanisms to enable SRL to perform better in Chinese and English. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art in Chinese and English on three widely-used benchmarks. |
Are Decoder-Only Language Models Better than Encoder-Only Language Models in Understanding Word Meaning? (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are highly effective tools for solving different kinds of problems in natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to solve a myriad of problems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs worse on word meaning comprehension than an encoder-only model with vastly fewer parameters. |
Decoder-Only LLMs can be Masked Auto-Encoders (2025.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
Dan Qiao, Yuan Gao, Zheming Yang, Di Yang, Ziheng Wu, Pengcheng Lu, Minghui Qiu, Juntao Li, Min Zhang
| Challenge: | Modern NLP workflows require different models for generation and embedding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that transforms an LLM into a Uni-Directional Masked Auto-Encoder. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art under unsupervised conditions with merely 100 training steps. |
Beyond Decoder-only: Large Language Models Can be Good Encoders for Machine Translation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Yingfeng Luo, Tong Zheng, Yongyu Mu, Bei Li, Qinghong Zhang, Yongqi Gao, Ziqiang Xu, Peinan Feng, Xiaoqian Liu, Tong Xiao, JingBo Zhu
| Challenge: | Recent advances in machine translation have focused on a single pre-trained decoder . encoder-decoder architectures have received relatively little attention in NMT . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages LLMs as MT encoders and pairs them with lightweight decoders to develop universal translation models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method matches or surpasses baselines in terms of translation quality but achieves 75% reduction in memory footprint of the KV cache. |
Encoder-Decoder Models Can Benefit from Pre-trained Masked Language Models in Grammatical Error Correction (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for incorporating a masked language model into an EncDec model have potential drawbacks when applied to GEC. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate a pre-trained masked language model (MLM) into an encoder-decoder model for grammatical error correction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art on BEA-2019 and CoNLL-2014 benchmarks. |
Sequence Repetition Enhances Token Embeddings and Improves Sequence Labeling with Decoder-only Language Models (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern language models (LMs) are trained in autoregressive manner, conditioned on the prefix. sequence labeling (SL) tasks assign labels to each individual input token, naturally benefiting from bidirectional context. |
| Approach: | They explore sequence repetition (SR) as a less invasive alternative to decoder-only models . they show that increasing the number of repetitions does not degrade SL performance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique improves the quality of token-level embeddings and surpasses encoders and unmasked decoders. |
Improving Pre-trained Language Model Sensitivity via Mask Specific losses: A case study on Biomedical NER (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Fine-tuning is the prevailing practice for adapting language models (LMs) to new domains. |
| Approach: | They propose a mask specific language model that weights the importance of domain-specific terms during fine-tuning to avoid insensitivity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms advanced masking strategies such as span- and PMI-based masking. |
Knowledgeable or Educated Guess? Revisiting Language Models as Knowledge Bases (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that pre-trained masked language models can be factual knowledge bases. |
| Approach: | They conduct a rigorous study to explore the underlying predicting mechanisms of MLMs . they find that previous decent performance mainly owes to the biased prompts which overfit dataset artifacts a . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on illustrative cases and external contexts . the results question the previous findings that MLMs can be reliable factual knowledge bases . |
Fast, Effective, and Self-Supervised: Transforming Masked Language Models into Universal Lexical and Sentence Encoders (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have shown that pretrained Masked Language Models are not effective as universal lexical and sentence encoders off-the-shelf, i.e., without further task-specific fine-tuning on NLI, sentence similarity, or paraphrasing tasks using annotated task data. |
| Approach: | They propose a contrastive learning technique which turns pretrained MLMs into effective universal lexical and sentence encoders without additional data. |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique can turn MLMs into effective universal lexical and sentence encoders even without additional data. |