Challenge: Logic models are prone to hallucinations and are not able to perform basic tasks like drafting and drafting documents.
Approach: They propose a new prompting method which elicits rule-based reasoning through decomposition and recomposition.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms other prompting methods including chain of thought and self-ask on eight rule-based reasoning tasks.

Similar Papers

LogicBench: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Logical Reasoning Ability of Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work investigating the logical reasoning ability of large language models has focused only on a couple of inference rules of propositional and first-order logics.
Approach: They propose to use a natural language question-answering dataset to evaluate the logical reasoning ability of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed model performs poorly on a range of natural language questions using chain-of-thought prompting.
Chain-of-Reasoning: Towards Unified Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via a Multi-Paradigm Perspective (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work shows that LLMs rely on single-paradigm reasoning that limits their effectiveness across diverse tasks.
Approach: They propose a new framework that integrates multiple reasoning paradigms to enable synergistic collaboration.
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms current SOTA models in theorem proving tasks and the MATH benchmark in arithmetic tasks.
Multi-Step Inference for Reasoning Over Paragraphs (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models for complex reasoning use symbols or black-box transformers . a compositional model can chain together free-form predicates and logical connectives .
Approach: They propose a compositional model that finds relevant sentences and then chains them together using neural modules.
Outcome: The proposed model improves performance on a recently-introduced dataset.
Can LLMs Reason with Rules? Logic Scaffolding for Stress-Testing and Improving LLMs (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have impressive human-like performance across various reasoning tasks, but their mastery of underlying inferential rules falls short of human capabilities.
Approach: They propose a logic scaffolding inferential rule generation framework to construct an infer- ential rule base, ULogic, comprising both primitive and compositional rules across five domains.
Outcome: The proposed model improves the ability to generate accurate, complex and abstract conclusions and premises and improves various commonsense reasoning tasks.
Bi-Chainer: Automated Large Language Models Reasoning with Bidirectional Chaining (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing unidirectional chaining methods suffer from low prediction accuracy and efficiency.
Approach: They propose a bidirectional chaining method which dynamically switches to depth-first reasoning in the opposite reasoning direction when it encounters multiple branching options within the current direction.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves sizable accuracy boots over unidirectional chaining frameworks on four challenging logical reasoning datasets.
What Makes a Good Reasoning Chain? Uncovering Structural Patterns in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in reasoning with large language models have popularized Long Chain-of-Thought (LCoT) a framework that converts sequential LCoTs into hierarchical tree structures enables deeper structural analysis of LLM reasoning.
Approach: They propose a framework that converts sequential LCoTs into hierarchical tree structures and enables deeper structural analysis of LLM reasoning.
Outcome: The proposed framework can be used to analyze LLM reasoning in a variety of tasks and models.
How Long Reasoning Chains Influence LLMs’ Judgment of Answer Factuality (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted as scalable judges for open-ended generation, yet how they form judgments remains insufficiently understood.
Approach: They show that exposing reasoning influences LLM-based judgment . they also show that reasoning fluency and factuality critically shape judgment outcomes .
Outcome: Empirical results show that the presence of reasoning significantly alters judgment behavior . stronger judges exhibit more selective behavior and achieve higher judgment accuracy .
Chain of Methodologies: Scaling Test Time Computation without Training (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing prompts for complex reasoning tasks are limited to specific tasks with few-shot examples due to constraints like context length and information extraction accuracy.
Approach: They propose a method to build structured reasoning processes by injecting human insights into LLMs' training data.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baselines in the analysis of large language models.
Logic-of-Thought: Injecting Logic into Contexts for Full Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various tasks but their performance in complex logical reasoning tasks remains unsatisfactory.
Approach: They propose a propositional logic prompting method which generates expanded logical information descriptions and utilizes them as an additional augmentation to original contexts.
Outcome: Extensive experiments show that Logic-of-Thought boosts the performance of various prompting methods with a striking margin across five logical reasoning tasks.
Boosting Language Models Reasoning with Chain-of-Knowledge Prompting (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can be effective on complex reasoning tasks but generates unfaithful and unfactual reasoning chains.
Approach: They propose a chain-of-knowledge prompting that elicits Large Language Models to generate explicit pieces of knowledge evidence in the form of structure triple.
Outcome: The proposed method improves commonsense, factual, symbolic, and arithmetic reasoning tasks by estimating the reliability of the reasoning chains in terms of factuality and faithfulness.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations