Code Prompting Elicits Conditional Reasoning Abilities in Text+Code LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent prompting techniques have improved LLMs’ performance on various reasoning tasks, but there is little understanding of what triggers reasoning abilities in LLM in the inference stage. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that transforms a natural language problem into code and directly prompts the LLM using the generated code without resorting to external code execution. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method boosts multiple LLMs by 22.52 percentage points on GPT 3.5, 7.75 on Mixtral, and 16.78 on Mistral. |
Similar Papers
Prompting with Pseudo-Code Instructions (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | ambiguity in natural language can hinder performance of large language models. |
| Approach: | They manually create a dataset of pseudo-code prompts for 132 different classification, QA, and generative language tasks, sourced from the Super-NaturalInstructions dataset. |
| Outcome: | The pseudo-code prompts improve the performance of two LLM families, BLOOM and CodeGen. |
Metacognitive Prompting Improves Understanding in Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in prompting have enhanced reasoning in logic-intensive tasks for LLMs, yet the nuanced understanding abilities of these models remain underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a strategy inspired by human introspective reasoning processes to enhance LLMs' understanding abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms chain-of-thought prompting and its advanced versions on ten natural language understanding (NLU) datasets. |
Teaching-Inspired Integrated Prompting Framework: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across various domains but struggle with arithmetic reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Teaching-Inspired Integrated Prompting Framework which emulates the instructional process of a teacher guiding students. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reasoning accuracy on nine benchmarks. |
Enhancing Function-Calling Capabilities in LLMs: Strategies for Prompt Formats, Data Integration, and Multilingual Translation (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced autonomous agents, particularly in zero-shot tool usage, also known as function calling. |
| Approach: | They propose to integrate function descriptions into prompt formats and introduce a new Decision Token for conditional prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed decision token improves function-calling accuracy and relevance detection and a translation pipeline overcomes multilingual limitations. |
Code to Think, Think to Code: A Survey on Code-Enhanced Reasoning and Reasoning-Driven Code Intelligence in LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Dayu Yang, Tianyang Liu, Daoan Zhang, Antoine Simoulin, Xiaoyi Liu, Yuwei Cao, Zhaopu Teng, Xin Qian, Grey Yang, Jiebo Luo, Julian McAuley
| Challenge: | Recent breakthrough models like OpenAI-o1 and DeepSeek-R1 show powerful task-solving capabilities, particularly advances in reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose future research directions that may deepen the synergy, ultimately advancing LLM performance in both complex reasoning and code intelligence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed research may deepen the synergy, ultimately advancing LLM performance in both complex reasoning and code intelligence. |
The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that pretraining and instruction-tuned LLMs can achieve impressive performance on a multitude of tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a standard for prompting research to better understand linguistic properties of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed standard would improve the performance of pre-trained and instruction-tuned LLMs on a multitude of tasks. |
What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on prompt quality show imbalanced support across models and tasks, and research gaps. |
| Approach: | They propose a property- and human-centric framework for evaluating prompt quality . they propose comparing prompt quality to other factors such as adverbs and apverbs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reveals imbalanced support across models and tasks and substantial research gaps. |
The Magic of IF: Investigating Causal Reasoning Abilities in Large Language Models of Code (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | entailment a) |
| Approach: | entailment : We want to explore whether Code-LLMs with code prompts are better . encoding a code prompt is better than text-only LLMs, they say . |
| Outcome: | entailment : Our results show that Code-LLMs with code prompts are better compared to text-only LLMs. |
Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive multilingual capability, but their performance varies substantially across different languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a generic template prompt that stimulates cross-lingual and logical reasoning skills to enhance task performance across languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves multilingual capability across languages and covers high-resource and low-resourced languages. |
Towards Understanding Chain-of-Thought Prompting: An Empirical Study of What Matters (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can dramatically improve the multi-step reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose to use Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting to encourage the LLM to generate intermediate rationales for solving a problem by providing a series of reasoning steps in the demonstrations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate coherent lines of reasoning even with invalid demonstrations while still generating coherent lines during inference. |