Challenge: 103 peer-reviewed publications on hallucination in large language models (LLMs) are characterized by a lack of agreement with the term ‘hallucination’ in the field of NLP.
Approach: They examine 103 peer-reviewed publications on hallucination in large language models (LLMs) and conduct a survey with 171 practitioners from the field of NLP and AI to capture varying perspectives on halllucination.
Outcome: The findings highlight the need for explicit definitions and frameworks outlining hallucination within NLP and highlight potential challenges.

Similar Papers

The Troubling Emergence of Hallucination in Large Language Models - An Extensive Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent advances in Large Language Models have generated widespread acclaim, but hallucination has also emerged as a by-product.
Approach: They propose a fine-grained discourse on profiling hallucination based on its degree, orientation, and category . they categorize hallucines into six types: acronym ambiguity, generated golem, virtual voice, geographic erratum, time wrap .
Outcome: The proposed method categorizes hallucination into six types based on their degree, orientation, and category .
Can We Trust AI Doctors? A Survey of Medical Hallucination in Large Language and Large Vision-Language Models (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Hallucination is a critical challenge for large language models and large vision-language models (LVLMs) however, dedicated research on medical hallucinations remains unexplored.
Approach: They provide a unified perspective on medical hallucination for both LLMs and LVLMs, and delve into its causes.
Outcome: The proposed models have demonstrated impressive performance on a variety of medical benchmarks.
Tutorial Proposal: Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Grasping the intricacies of hallucination in LLMs can be daunting, especially for those new to the field.
Approach: This tutorial aims to bridge the gap between the field and the field of hallucination . it will explore the key aspects of hallucinonation, including benchmarking, detection, and mitigation techniques .
Outcome: This tutorial will explore the key aspects of hallucination in LLMs . it will also explore the specific constraints and shortcomings of current approaches .
Evaluating Evaluation Metrics – The Mirage of Hallucination Detection (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large-scale empirical evaluation of hallucination detection metrics is conducted . hallucinosity is a significant obstacle to the reliability and widespread adoption of language models .
Approach: They conduct large-scale empirical evaluation of hallucination detection metrics . they compare hallucinian language models, language models and decoding methods .
Outcome: The results show that the evaluations of hallucination detection metrics fail to align with human judgments, they say . they also show that evaluations with LLM-based evaluation yield the best overall results .
Addressing Bias and Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024.lrec-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of two critical aspects of Large Language Models: bias and hallucination.
Approach: This tutorial provides an overview of two critical aspects of Large Language Models: bias and hallucination.
Outcome: This tutorial delves into the complex dimensions of Large Language Models (LLMs) it outlines ethical considerations pertinent to their development and discusses hallucination, a prevalent issue in generative AI systems such as LLMs.
How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM Hallucination (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: despite LLMs becoming increasingly multilingual, most studies on detecting and quantifying LLM hallucination are English-centric .
Approach: They train a multilingual hallucination detection model and conduct a large-scale study across 30 languages and 6 open-source LLM families.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on an English-centric model and annotates gold data for five high-resource languages.
The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a growing number of researchers are studying the hallucination issue in large language models.
Approach: They propose a hallucination detection benchmark and a method to detect hallucines in LLMs.
Outcome: The proposed method detects hallucinations and mitigates them using different training stages.
Do Robot Snakes Dream like Electric Sheep? Investigating the Effects of Architectural Inductive Biases on Hallucination (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have a tendency to hallucinate false or misleading information, limiting their reliability.
Approach: They examine how architecture-based inductive biases affect the propensity to hallucinate . they find that the models are more reliable and more reliable than traditional models .
Outcome: The proposed models can be used to train and train large language models that are factual or able to explain themselves through their knowledge.
Distorted or Fabricated? A Survey on Hallucination in Video LLMs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Despite significant advances in video-language modeling, hallucinations remain a persistent challenge in video large language models.
Approach: They present a systematic taxonomy that categorizes hallucinations into two core types: dynamic distortion and content fabrication.
Outcome: The proposed taxonomy categorizes hallucinations into two core types: dynamic distortion and content fabrication.
On Large Language Models’ Hallucination with Regard to Known Facts (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models are successful in answering factoid questions but are also prone to hallucination.
Approach: They propose self-reporting to the model when faced with such limitations.
Outcome: The proposed classifier can detect hallucinations with an 88% success rate and can be used to answer factoid questions with correct answer knowledge.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations