LLM4Decompile: Decompiling Binary Code with Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Decompilation aims to convert binary code to high-level source code, but traditional tools like Ghidra often produce results that are difficult to read and execute. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source LLM series trained to decompile binary code . they optimize the LLM training process and introduce the Llm4Decompile-End models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform GPT-4o and Ghidra on the HumanEval and ExeBench benchmarks by over 100% in terms of re-executability rate. |
Similar Papers
Introducing Compiler Semantics into Large Language Models as Programming Language Translators: A Case Study of C to x86 Assembly (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to translate high-level programming languages to machine instructions. |
| Approach: | They propose two methods to solve a problem known as neural compilation by using a 13B model with a behavioral accuracy of over 91%. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms the larger model by over 50% and achieves a behavioral accuracy of over 91% while outperforming the GPT-4 Turbo model. |
DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Runchu Tian, Yining Ye, Yujia Qin, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin, Yinxu Pan, Yesai Wu, Hui Haotian, Liu Weichuan, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional coding capabilities, but their debugging capabilities remain relatively unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a debugging benchmark consisting of 4,253 LLMs with four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. |
CodeT5+: Open Code Large Language Models for Code Understanding and Generation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing code LLMs adopt a specific architecture or rely on a unified encoder-decoder network for downstream tasks, lacking flexibility to operate in the optimal architecture for a particular task. |
| Approach: | They propose to initialize code LLMs with frozen off-the-shelf LLM and explore instruction-tuning to align with natural language instructions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms open-source LLMs on 20 code-related benchmarks. |
Debug like a Human: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step by Step (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are leading progress in code generation, but they are underutilized in the literature. |
| Approach: | They propose a debugging framework that allows LLMs to refine their generated programs with the runtime execution information. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves the baseline performance by 9.8% across the HumanEval, MBPP, and TransCoder benchmarks. |
GPT-Fathom: Benchmarking Large Language Models to Decipher the Evolutionary Path towards GPT-4 and Beyond (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing LLM leaderboards often reference scores reported in other papers without consistent settings and prompts, which may encourage cherry-picking favored settings and for better results. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-source and reproducible LLM evaluation suite built on top of OpenAI Evals that systematically evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
| Outcome: | The evaluation suite is built on top of OpenAI Evals and evaluates 10+ leading LLMs and OpenAI’s legacy models on 20+ curated benchmarks across 7 capability categories. |
CoDet-M4: Detecting Machine-Generated Code in Multi-Lingual, Multi-Generator and Multi-Domain Settings (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized code generation but have significant consequences for programming skills, ethics, and assessment integrity. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework capable of distinguishing between human-written and LLM-generated program code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework distinguishes between human-written and LLM-generated program code across multiple programming languages, code generators, and domains. |
Prompting Large Language Models to Tackle the Full Software Development Lifecycle: A Case Study (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Bowen Li, Wenhan Wu, Ziwei Tang, Lin Shi, John Yang, Jinyang Li, Shunyu Yao, Chen Qian, Binyuan Hui, Qicheng Zhang, Zhiyin Yu, He Du, Ping Yang, Dahua Lin, Chao Peng, Kai Chen
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focused on simplified or isolated aspects of coding, ignoring the full spectrum of programming challenges. |
| Approach: | They propose a case study that examines the performance of large language models across the entire software development lifecycle with four programming languages, multiple domains, and carefully designed and verified metrics for each task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs across the entire software development lifecycle, including design, environment setup, implementation, acceptance testing, and unit testing. |
The Program Testing Ability of Large Language Models for Code (2024.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent development of large language models (LLMs) for code shows promise in achieving code intelligence. |
| Approach: | They explore the ability of large language models to generate automated test cases . they show +11.77% and +4.22% higher code pass rates on HumanEval+ . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show higher pass rates on humanEval+ compared with the current state-of-the-art models. |
Self-Constructed Context Decompilation with Fined-grained Alignment Enhancement (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Decompilation is the process of converting compiled code back into a high-level programming language for analysis when source code is unavailable. |
| Approach: | They propose two methods to improve decompilation performance without fine-tuning and fine-grained alignment enhancement to achieve further improvements. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods achieved a Re-Executability performance improvement of approximately 3.90% on the Decompile-Eval benchmark, establishing a new state-of-the-art performance of 52.41%. |
A Survey on Efficient Large Language Model Training: From Data-centric Perspectives (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Junyu Luo, Bohan Wu, Xiao Luo, Zhiping Xiao, Yiqiao Jin, Rong-Cheng Tu, Nan Yin, Yifan Wang, Jingyang Yuan, Wei Ju, Ming Zhang
| Challenge: | achieving data-efficient post-training of Large Language Models is a key research question. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy of data-efficient LLM post-training methods from a data-centric perspective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods cover data selection, data quality enhancement, synthetic data generation, data distillation and compression, and self-evolving data ecosystems. |