Evaluating Psychological Safety of Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study evaluated the psychological safety of large language models.
Approach: They designed unbiased prompts to evaluate the psychological safety of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed prompts showed that they were fine-tuned with behavioral metrics to reduce toxicity.

Similar Papers

On the Reliability of Psychological Scales on Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research has focused on examining Large Language Models’ characteristics from a psychological standpoint, acknowledging the necessity of understanding their behavioral characteristics.
Approach: They propose to examine the reliability of personality tests to LLMs by using psychological scales.
Outcome: The proposed model can represent diverse personalities with specific prompt instructions.
A Chinese Dataset for Evaluating the Safeguards in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study has shown that large language models can produce harmful responses, exposing users to unexpected risks.
Approach: They propose a dataset for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs in Mandarin Chinese . they extend the dataset to better identify false negative and false positive examples .
Outcome: The proposed dataset is for the safety evaluation of Chinese LLMs, and is based on a Chinese dataset.
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality traits, but there is limited research on whether they consistently reflect specific personality traits.
Approach: They propose to study the behavior of LLM-based agents which they refer to as LLM personas and simulate them to measure their personality traits.
Outcome: The proposed model is based on the Big Five personality model and has been validated by human evaluations and automatic evaluations.
Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large amount of data exposes large language models to toxicity and bias . prompt engineering can be easily bypassed with minimal prompt engineering.
Approach: They propose a dataset that uses manually crafted prompts to nullify protective layers of large language models.
Outcome: The proposed dataset shows that prompts can nullify protective layers of large language models.
SafeConf: A Confidence-Calibrated Safety Self-Evaluation Method for Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have many advantages but they also pose significant safety risks.
Approach: They propose a method to enhance the safety self-evaluation capability of LLMs . they perform semantic mutations on the original safety evaluation questions .
Outcome: The proposed method improves safety self-evaluation accuracy by 5.86% and 7.79% over baseline methods on Chinese and English datasets.
Safety of Large Language Models Beyond English: A Systematic Literature Review of Risks, Biases, and Safeguards (2026.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have a growing number of applications that generate harmful, biased, or unsafe content.
Approach: They synthesize findings from recent studies that evaluate their robustness across languages . they highlight gaps in multilingual safety research and recommend future work .
Outcome: The systematic review examines the multilingual safety of large language models in English . it identifies challenges such as dataset availability and evaluation biases .
The Art of Defending: A Systematic Evaluation and Analysis of LLM Defense Strategies on Safety and Over-Defensiveness (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on Large Language Models (LLMs) has identified a number of approaches to protect against their vulnerabilities and safety.
Approach: They propose to use a large collection of safe and unsafe prompts to evaluate various LLM defense strategies over both ‘safety’ and ‘over-defensiveness’.
Outcome: The proposed defense strategies are compared on multiple state-of-the-art LLMs and show that they are effective against both ‘safety’ and ‘over-defensiveness’.
Chinese SafetyQA: A Safety Short-form Factuality Benchmark for Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models have created significant safety concerns . factuality ability is crucial in determining whether they can be deployed and applied safely and compliantly within specific regions.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate the factuality of large language models in China . they evaluate the models' ability to provide accurate and reliable information .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark evaluates the factuality abilities of existing LLMs and compares them to LLM abilities.
Systematic Evaluation of Auto-Encoding and Large Language Model Representations for Capturing Author States and Traits (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used in human-centered applications, yet their ability to model diverse psychological constructs is not well understood.
Approach: They evaluated a range of Transformer-LMs to predict psychological variables across five major dimensions: affect, substance use, mental health, sociodemographics, and personality.
Outcome: The models predict affect, substance use, mental health, sociodemographics, and personality across five major dimensions.
LongSafety: Evaluating Long-Context Safety of Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in understanding and generating long sequences.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLM safety in open-ended long-context tasks . they find that relevant context and extended input sequences can exacerbate safety risks .
Outcome: The proposed benchmark identifies significant safety vulnerabilities in 16 LLMs . strong safety performance in short-context scenarios does not correlate with safety in long-contact tasks .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations