RETAIN: Interactive Tool for Regression Testing Guided LLM Migration (2024.emnlp-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into diverse applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a tool specifically designed for regression testing during LLM migrations. |
| Outcome: | RETAIN (REgression Testing guided LLM migrAtIoN) provides a tool specifically designed for regression testing during LLM migrations. |
Similar Papers
What Did I Do Wrong? Quantifying LLMs’ Sensitivity and Consistency to Prompt Engineering (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved productivity in a number of routine tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose two metrics for classification tasks, namely *sensitivity* and *consistency*, which are complementary to task performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metrics are complementary to task performance and can be used to guide prompt engineering and obtain LLMs that balance robustness and performance. |
PrExMe! Large Scale Prompt Exploration of Open Source LLMs for Machine Translation and Summarization Evaluation (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are useful for low-resource scenarios and time-restricted applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale evaluation tool for large language models that uses prompts . they evaluate 720 prompt templates for open-source LLM-based metrics on MT and summarization datasets a 6.6M evaluations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model evaluates 720 prompt templates on machine translation and summarization datasets. |
Continual Learning of Large Language Models (2025.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial explores the challenges of continual learning in large language models . participants will learn strategies to mitigate forgetting and manage data and evaluation pipelines . |
| Approach: | This tutorial offers a comprehensive exploration of continual learning in the context of large language models. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial explores the challenges of continual learning in large language models . participants will learn how to manage data and evaluation pipelines and adapt responsibly . |
A Survey of Confidence Estimation and Calibration in Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks in various domains, but they can be unreliable due to factual errors in their generations. |
| Approach: | They summarize recent advances in LLM confidence estimation and calibration and outline their main lessons learned. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods can be used to assess the reliability of models and to calibrate them across tasks. |
Too Consistent to Detect: A Study of Self-Consistent Errors in LLMs (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Hexiang Tan, Fei Sun, Sha Liu, Du Su, Qi Cao, Xin Chen, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Yuanzhuo Wang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
| Challenge: | Existing detection methods fail to account for **self-consistent error** . study identifies self-consistency errors and evaluates them . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that fuses hidden state evidence from an external verifier LLM to detect self-consistent errors. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly enhances performance on self-consistent errors across three LLM families. |
CRITICTOOL: Evaluating Self-Critique Capabilities of Large Language Models in Tool-Calling Error Scenarios (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a number of tools are used to perform complex tasks, but the tool utilization process can cause errors. |
| Approach: | They propose a critique evaluation benchmark for tool learning that analyzes function-calling errors on tool evaluation benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed critique evaluation benchmark holds diverse tool-use errors with varying complexities, which better reflects real-world scenarios. |
LLMs in the Imaginarium: Tool Learning through Simulated Trial and Error (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on tool-augmented LLMs focuses on the broad coverage of tools and the flexibility of adding new tools. |
| Approach: | They propose a biologically inspired method for tool-augmented LLMs that orchestrates three key mechanisms for successful tool use behaviors in the biological system: trial and error, imagination, and memory. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves tool learning for LLMs under both in-context learning and fine-tuning settings, bringing a boost of 46.7% to Mistral-Instruct-7B and outperforms GPT-4. |
Feedback-Driven Tool-Use Improvements in Large Language Models via Automated Build Environments (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Junjie Ye, Changhao Jiang, Zhengyin Du, Yufei Xu, Xuesong Yao, Zhiheng Xi, Xiaoran Fan, Qi Zhang, Tao Gui, Xuanjing Huang, Jiecao Chen
| Challenge: | Currently, there are no efficient reinforcement learning (RL) frameworks specifically designed for tool use. |
| Approach: | They propose an automated environment construction pipeline that incorporates scenario decomposition, document generation, function integration, complexity scaling, and localized deployment to enable high-quality training environments without external tools. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework significantly improves the models’ tool-use performance without degrading their general capabilities. |
Failures Pave the Way: Enhancing Large Language Models through Tuning-free Rule Accumulation (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance, but they keep repeating similar mistakes due to their inability to capture relationships among samples. |
| Approach: | They propose a tuning-free rule accumulation framework that guides LLMs in improving their performance by learning from previous mistakes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves over baselines by a large margin over previous frameworks. |
LLM-Evolve: Evaluation for LLM’s Evolving Capability on Benchmarks (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for large language models evaluate LLMs on i.i.d. tasks, overlooking their ability to learn iteratively from past experiences. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework which extends established benchmarks to sequential problem-solving settings and provides feedback after each round to build a demonstration memory that the models can query in future tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can improve performance of LLMs by learning from past interactions and improve models' performance over time. |