Challenge: Recent advances in Language Models (LMs) have shown their effectiveness in knowledge-intensive tasks.
Approach: They investigate whether a generative language model is able to access its memory sequentially or randomly.
Outcome: The proposed LMs are able to access memory sequentially or randomly.

Similar Papers

Memory-R1: Enhancing Large Language Model Agents to Manage and Utilize Memories via Reinforcement Learning (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are stateless and limited by a finite context window, preventing them from maintaining knowledge across long conversations or evolving tasks.
Approach: They propose a reinforcement learning framework that empowers LLMs to actively manage external memory through two specialized agents.
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms baselines and benchmarks across diverse question types, three benchmarks, and multiple model scales.
Unlocking Memorization in Large Language Models with Dynamic Soft Prompting (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pretrained large language models excel in a variety of natural language processing tasks . however, they pose significant security risks due to their tendency to memorize training data .
Approach: They propose a method to estimate LLM memorization using dynamic, prefix-dependent soft prompts.
Outcome: The proposed method can achieve maximum relative improvement of 135.3% and 39.8% over baseline compared to state-of-the-art methods.
GSM-Noise: Exploring and Enhancing Large Language Models’ Reasoning under Noisy Inputs (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models struggle when dealing with complex, ill-formed, or noisy inputs . open-source models are less robust, while closed-source ones are more robust .
Approach: They propose to use GSM-Noise to refine inputs before engaging in in-depth analysis to improve LLM robustness under noisy conditions.
Outcome: The proposed model can achieve consistent performance gains under noisy conditions with prompt engineering, supervised finetuning, and reinforcement learning.
How Do Multilingual Language Models Remember Facts? (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior research has focused on English monolingual models, but how these mechanisms generalize to non-English languages remains unexplored.
Approach: They analyze three multilingual LLMs to find out how they can generalize recall mechanisms . they find that subject enrichment is language-independent, object extraction is language dependent .
Outcome: The proposed model performs better in multilingual contexts than in English models . the model is more efficient in multi-lingual context, but it is more complex in multilinguistic models compared to English models.
Retentive or Forgetful? Diving into the Knowledge Memorizing Mechanism of Language Models (2024.lrec-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pre-trained language models have shown remarkable memory formation, but vanilla networks without pre-training suffer catastrophic forgetting problem.
Approach: They conduct experiments to investigate the retentive-forgetful contradiction between vanilla and pre-trained language models by controlling the target knowledge types, learning strategies and learning schedules.
Outcome: The results show that pre-trained language models are forgetful and pre-training leads to retentive models .
Retrieval Helps or Hurts? A Deeper Dive into the Efficacy of Retrieval Augmentation to Language Models (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LMs) excel in retrieving popular facts, but encounter difficulty with infrequent entity-relation pairs compared to retrievers.
Approach: They propose to use a WiTQA dataset to explore the effects of combinations of entities and relations on LMs.
Outcome: The proposed model can retain popular relations of less common entities while retaining the same popular relations.
Can Generative Pre-trained Language Models Serve As Knowledge Bases for Closed-book QA? (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work is limited in using small benchmarks with high test-train overlaps.
Approach: They construct a dataset of closed-book QA using SQuAD and investigate the performance of BART.
Outcome: Experiments show that pre-trained language models can achieve high performance on closed-book QA tasks.
Exploring Language Model Generalization in Low-Resource Extractive QA (2025.coling-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLMs struggle with dataset demands of closed domains such as medicine and law . current LLM performance in closed domain is lacking, even on traditional tasks such as Natural Language Inference .
Approach: They investigate Extractive Question Answering (EQA) with Large Language Models (LLMs) under domain drift . they find that LLMs struggle with dataset demands of closed domains .
Outcome: The proposed model performs poorly in extractive question answering tasks under domain drift . the proposed model can generalize to domains that require specific knowledge without training .
Shall We Pretrain Autoregressive Language Models with Retrieval? A Comprehensive Study (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that retrieval-augmented LMs can improve text generation quality and accuracy.
Approach: They propose a model that reproduces RETRO parameters while retrieving a text corpus . they find RETRO outperforms GPT on text generation with less repetition .
Outcome: The proposed model outperforms standard retrieval-augmented GPT and retrieval augmented GTP on text generation and accuracy tasks.
Unsupervised Natural Question Answering with a Small Model (D19-66)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent demonstration of the power of huge language models such as GPT-2 to memorise the answers to factoid questions raises questions about the extent to which knowledge is embedded directly within these large models.
Approach: They propose to use unsupervised learning techniques to add knowledge explicitly without extensive training.
Outcome: The proposed architecture allows for explicit addition of knowledge without extensive training.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations