Make Your Decision Convincing! A Unified Two-Stage Framework: Self-Attribution and Decision-Making (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing frameworks for explaining black-box model behavior are unreliable . large-scale pre-trained models often rely on superficial clues for predictions . |
| Approach: | They propose a unified two-stage framework that uses subsequences from the input text as a rationale to generate model decision. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves competitive results on five reasoning datasets and in semi-supervised scenarios. |
Similar Papers
Self-training with Few-shot Rationalization (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work focused on training largescale and complex neural network models, but they are opaque in terms of their decision-making process. |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task teacher-student framework for self-training pre-trained language models with limited task-specific labels and annotated rationales. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance in low-resource settings by making it aware of its rationalized predictions. |
End-to-End Self-Debiasing Framework for Robust NLU Training (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models incorporate dataset biases leading to strong performance on in-distribution test sets but poor performance on out-of-distortion (OOD) tests. |
| Approach: | They propose a debiasing framework where the shallow representations of the main model are used to derive a bias model and both models are trained simultaneously. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing approaches on three well-studied NLU tasks while still delivering high in-distribution performance. |
Self-AMPLIFY: Improving Small Language Models with Self Post Hoc Explanations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Autoregressive Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated "emergent abilities" such as in-context learning, instruction following and reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that generates rationales from post hoc explanation methods applied to small language models to improve their own performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves on four SLMs and five datasets with strong reasoning abilities. |
Improving Language Model Reasoning with Self-motivated Learning (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large-scale high-quality training data is important for improving the performance of models. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that motivates the model to automatically generate rationales on existing datasets and improves the performance of reasoning through reinforcement learning. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms InstructGPT on multiple reasoning datasets and outperformed InstructGPT on other datasets. |
LLM2: Let Large Language Models Harness System 2 Reasoning (2025.naacl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results on mathematical reasoning benchmarks substantiate the efficacy of Large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that combines an LLM with a process-based verifier to generate plausible candidates and provide timely process-driven feedback to distinguish desirable and undesirable outputs. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that LLM2 improves accuracy on GSM8K and self-consistency increases major@20 accuracy. |
Decomposition-Enhanced Training for Post-Hoc Attributions in Language Models (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Sriram Balasubramanian, Samyadeep Basu, Koustava Goswami, Ryan A. Rossi, Varun Manjunatha, Roshan Santhosh, Ruiyi Zhang, Soheil Feizi, Nedim Lipka
| Challenge: | Existing methods for extractive QA struggle in multi-hop, abstractive, and semi-extractive settings. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that prompts models to produce answer decompositions as intermediate reasoning steps. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing methods and matches or exceeds state-of-the-art frontier models. |
Advancing Large Language Model Attribution through Self-Improving (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Lei Huang, Xiaocheng Feng, Weitao Ma, Liang Zhao, Yuchun Fan, Weihong Zhong, Dongliang Xu, Qing Yang, Hongtao Liu, Bing Qin
| Challenge: | Teaching large language models to generate text with citations to evidence sources requires high-quality attribution data, which is costly and labor-intensive. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for iteratively improving the attribution capability of large language models (LLMs) by attributing output to verifiable sources. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on three open-domain question-answering datasets show that START improves in aggregating information across multiple sources. |
Improving Language Model Personas via Rationalization with Psychological Scaffolds (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to building personas rely on a user’s demographic attributes and/or prior judgments, but not on any underlying reasoning behind a person’s judgments. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework that integrates rationales for why a user could have made a certain judgment into LM personas by incorporating potential rationale. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms models conditioned on demographic attributes and/or prior judgments on public opinion and movie preference prediction tasks. |
What if you said that differently?: How Explanation Formats Affect Human Feedback Efficacy and User Perception (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Question answering models can often be black boxes, as their reasoning process is mostly opaque. |
| Approach: | They analyze the effect of rationales generated by QA models on user feedback and how well they enable users to understand and trust model answers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to improve model responses by removing feedback from end users and enhancing model outputs by using natural language feedback. |
ZARA: Improving Few-Shot Self-Rationalization for Small Language Models (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies demonstrate great performance gain for self-rationalization by few-shot prompting LMs with rationale-augmented exemplars. |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage explanations for small LMs to improve few-shot self-rationalization by reducing the problem of plausibility judgement to natural language inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves SOTA performance on the FEB benchmark, for both the task accuracy and the explanation metric. |