ClozEx: A Task toward Generation of English Cloze Explanation (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing tasks and datasets specifically designed for generating language learner explanations for cloze questions are lacking . clozing questions are used to assess language proficiency and enhance language learning . |
| Approach: | They propose a task ClozEx to generate explanations for cloze questions in LA . they use a curated dataset of clozing questions paired with explanations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed task generates fluent explanations for cloze questions in English as a second language learners. |
Similar Papers
CLIX: Cross-Lingual Explanations of Idiomatic Expressions (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing definition generation systems are difficult to use in second language learning due to the presence of unfamiliar words and grammar. |
| Approach: | They propose to use cross-lingual explanations of idiomatic expressions to support vocabulary expansion for language learners. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is able to explain idiomatic expressions in non-standard language. |
Pedagogically Aligned Objectives Create Reliable Automatic Cloze Tests (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study has focused on the cloze training objective of Masked Language Models . distractors must be distinct and incorrect, and can be biased if the test creator is testing two versions of a text . |
| Approach: | They propose a method that jointly optimizes sets of distractors from Masked Language Models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method has stronger correlation with teacher-created comprehension tests than state-of-the-art neural method and is more internally consistent. |
GMEG-EXP: A Dataset of Human- and LLM-Generated Explanations of Grammatical and Fluency Edits (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has explored the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate explanations of existing labeled data. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset to examine the ability of large language models to explain revisions in sentences by comparing human- and LLM-generated explanations of grammatical and fluency edits to a human evaluation criteria. |
| Outcome: | The proposed explanations address grammatical and fluency edits and are compared with a dataset built from the GMEG (Grammarly Multi-domain Evaluation for GEC) dataset. |
Exploiting Cloze-Questions for Few-Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inference (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to learning from examples are limited due to the vast number of languages, domains and tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-supervised training procedure that reformulates input examples as cloze-style phrases to help language models understand a given task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms supervised training and strong semi-supervised approaches in low-resource settings by a large margin. |
Explain-then-translate: an analysis on improving program translation with self-generated explanations (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using self-generated natural language explanations improves zero-shot performance by 12% on average. |
| Approach: | They propose to use self-generated natural language explanations as an intermediate step for code-to-code translation with language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves zero-shot performance by 12% on average . the proposed approach is not evaluated on a broader set of languages including low-resource languages. |
Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results indicate that we can effectively leverage language models for commonsense reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use commonsense auto-generated explanations to train language models to generate explanations that can be used during training and inference in a commonsensense Auto-Generated Explanation framework. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed framework improves on the commonsenseQA task by 10%. |
Data-Efficient Concept Extraction from Pre-trained Language Models for Commonsense Explanation Generation (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to extract concepts from pre-trained language models are not suitable for commonsense explanation generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to extract the key explanation concept from pre-trained language models by fine-tuning it with 20% training data and using a metric to evaluate the retrieved concepts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves evaluation metrics over pre-trained language models and the existing models. |
Explaining novel senses using definition generation with open language models (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | We apply definition generators based on open-weights large language models to create explanations of novel senses. |
| Approach: | They apply open-weights large language models to create explanations of novel senses using target word usages as input. |
| Outcome: | The proposed definition generators perform on par with decoder-only models. |
GEE! Grammar Error Explanation with Large Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing grammatical error correction tools do not provide natural language explanations of errors . a system needs to provide one-sentence explanations for each grammamatical errors in a pair of erroneous and corrected sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose a grammar error explanation task that uses one-sentence explanations for each grammatical error in a pair of erroneous and corrected sentences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline identifies grammar errors in German, Chinese, and English . human evaluation reveals that 93.9% of German errors, 96.4% of Chinese errors, and 92.20% of English errors are correctly detected and explained. |
FiD-Ex: Improving Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Extractive Rationale Generation (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained sequence to sequence models are effective in making and generating NL explanations, but they have many shortcomings. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that uses sentence markers to eliminate explanation fabrication . they use fusion-in-decoder architecture to handle long input contexts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves on the ERASER explainability benchmark. |