| Challenge: | Empirical results indicate that we can effectively leverage language models for commonsense reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use commonsense auto-generated explanations to train language models to generate explanations that can be used during training and inference in a commonsensense Auto-Generated Explanation framework. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed framework improves on the commonsenseQA task by 10%. |
Similar Papers
Data-Efficient Concept Extraction from Pre-trained Language Models for Commonsense Explanation Generation (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to extract concepts from pre-trained language models are not suitable for commonsense explanation generation. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to extract the key explanation concept from pre-trained language models by fine-tuning it with 20% training data and using a metric to evaluate the retrieved concepts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves evaluation metrics over pre-trained language models and the existing models. |
Improving Unsupervised Commonsense Reasoning Using Knowledge-Enabled Natural Language Inference (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent methods based on pre-trained language models have shown strong supervised performance on commonsense reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a common framework to solve commonsense reasoning tasks using a dataset from NLI. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves state-of-the-art unsupervised performance on two commonsense reasoning tasks. |
Commonsense Reasoning for Natural Language Processing (2020.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this tutorial, we will outline the various types of commonsense knowledge and discuss techniques to gather and represent commonsence knowledge. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will provide researchers with the critical foundations and recent advances in commonsense representation and reasoning. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial will outline the various types of commonsense and discuss techniques to gather and represent commonsence knowledge while highlighting the challenges specific to this type of knowledge (e.g., reporting bias). |
Reframing Human-AI Collaboration for Generating Free-Text Explanations (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models are capable of generating fluent-appearing text with little task-specific supervision. |
| Approach: | They propose a pipeline that combines GPT-3 with a supervised filter that incorporates binary acceptability judgments from humans in the loop. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate freetext explanations in a fewshot setting with human-written examples. |
Beyond Language: Learning Commonsense from Images for Reasoning (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing commonsense reasoning methods use raw texts to perform data representation and answer prediction tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach to learn commonsense from images instead of limited raw texts or costly knowledge bases. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms language-based methods on commonsense reasoning problems on two commonsence reasoning problems. |
Common Sense Beyond English: Evaluating and Improving Multilingual Language Models for Commonsense Reasoning (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using multilingual language models, commonsense reasoning research has been limited to English. |
| Approach: | They propose a Mickey Probe task to evaluate commonsense across languages . they propose X-CSQA and XCODAH datasets to be translated to 14 languages based on the Mickey corpus . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves sentence representations beyond English. |
Prompting Contrastive Explanations for Commonsense Reasoning Tasks (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large pretrained language models (PLMs) can achieve near-human performance on commonsense reasoning tasks, but provide little human-interpretable evidence of the underlying reasoning they use. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large pretrained language models to generate evidence for commonsense reasoning NLP tasks . they use models to contrast alternative explanations based on key attribute(s) required to justify the correct answer . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance on two commonsense reasoning benchmarks compared to previous non-contrastive alternatives. |
Commonsense Knowledge Transfer for Pre-trained Language Models (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in pre-trained language models have transformed the landscape of natural language processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to transfer commonsense knowledge stored in a neural commonsensing model to a general-purpose pre-trained language model. |
| Outcome: | Empirical results show that the proposed framework improves the model’s performance on downstream tasks that require commonsense reasoning. |
ExplaGraphs: An Explanation Graph Generation Task for Structured Commonsense Reasoning (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current commonsense-reasoning tasks are discriminative in nature, where a model answers a multiple-choice question for a certain context. |
| Approach: | They propose a generative task that generates a commonsense-augmented graph for stance prediction by using a create-verify-and-refine graph collection framework. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to generate a graph that serves as non-trivial, complete, and unambiguous explanation for the predicted stance. |
Unsupervised Deep Structured Semantic Models for Commonsense Reasoning (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for commonsense reasoning rely on human-crafted features and knowledge bases, but unsupervised learning is not feasible due to the lack of labeled training data or comprehensive knowledge bases. |
| Approach: | They propose two unsupervised models based on the Deep Structured Semantic Models framework to tackle two commonsense reasoning tasks: Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) and Pronoun Disambiguation (PDP). |
| Outcome: | The proposed models capture contextual information in the sentence and co-reference information between pronouns and nouns, and achieve significant improvement over previous state-of-the-art approaches. |