Challenge: Existing studies only compare decoding algorithms in narrow scenarios, and their findings do not generalize across tasks.
Approach: They propose a taxonomy of misalignment mitigation strategies to provide a unifying view of decoding as a tool for alignment.
Outcome: The proposed taxonomy combines likelihood and utility assumptions to provide general statements about decoding as a tool for alignment across tasks.

Similar Papers

Decoding Uncertainty: The Impact of Decoding Strategies for Uncertainty Estimation in Large Language Models (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Decoding strategies affect the probability distribution underlying the output of a language model and can therefore affect both generation quality and uncertainty.
Approach: They investigate the impact of decoding strategies on uncertainty estimation in large language models .
Outcome: The proposed methods improve the uncertainty estimation of large language models by reducing repetition.
A Thorough Examination of Decoding Methods in the Era of LLMs (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Decoding methods are essential for converting language models from next-token predictors into practical task solvers.
Approach: They propose to evaluate decoding methods in general-purpose large language models . they find that decoding method performance is notably task-dependent .
Outcome: The proposed methods perform task-dependently and are influenced by alignment, model size, and quantization.
Understanding Cross-Lingual Alignment—A Survey (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Cross-lingual alignment is the meaningful similarity of representations across languages in multilingual language models.
Approach: They propose a taxonomy of methods to improve cross-lingual alignment . they argue that an effective trade-off between language-neutral and language-specific information is key .
Outcome: The proposed methods can be applied to encoder models and encoder-decoder-only models . they show that language-neutral and language-specific information is key .
MetaAlign: Align Large Language Models with Diverse Preferences during Inference Time (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to align large language models with human preferences often result in a static alignment that cannot account for the diversity of human preferences in practical applications.
Approach: They propose a method to help large language models dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at inference time.
Outcome: The proposed method can help LLMs dynamically align with various explicit or implicit preferences specified at the inference stage, validating the feasibility of MetaAlign.
Aligners: Decoupling LLMs and Alignment (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) need to be aligned with human expectations to ensure their safety and utility in most applications.
Approach: They propose to decouple LLMs and alignment by training *aligner* models that can be used to align any LLM on an as-needed basis.
Outcome: The proposed model can be used to align any LLM for a given criteria on an as-needed basis.
Language Models Resist Alignment: Evidence From Data Compression (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) may exhibit undesirable behaviors due to the inevitable biases and harmful content present in training.
Approach: They propose to investigate the elasticity of large language models by examining their performance.
Outcome: The proposed model performance declines rapidly before reverting to the pre-training distribution, the authors show . the proposed model weight and code are available at pku-lm-res ist-alignment.github.io.
LIONs: An Empirically Optimized Approach to Align Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have focused on aligning large language models with pre-trained datasets.
Approach: They conduct a rigorous analysis of a three-stage training pipeline using sequence packing, loss masking and increasing the preference dataset size in DPO to improve the performance of language models.
Outcome: The proposed models outperform the official instruct models tuned with closed-source data and algorithms.
DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are expected to generate content aligned with human preferences.
Approach: They propose a framework that allows the user to customize reward functions and enables Decoding-time Alignment of LLMs (DeAL).
Outcome: The proposed framework allows the user to customize reward functions and enables Decoding-time Alignment of LLMs.
Alignment Tuning for Large Language Models: A Data-Centric Lens on Alignment Data Pipelines (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a large number of alignment tuning literature is organized around optimization objectives, but the construction of alignment data is often treated implicitly.
Approach: They propose to decompose alignment data construction into three interacting stages . they identify recurring design trade-offs and failure modes observed across prior alignment methods .
Outcome: The proposed framework identifies recurring design trade-offs and failure modes observed across prior alignment methods and outlines open challenges for alignment data pipelines including prompt-level alignment, agentic settings, and alignment under evolving objectives.
Large Vision-Language Model Alignment and Misalignment: A Survey Through the Lens of Explainability (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Vision-Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in processing both visual and textual information.
Approach: They examine the challenge of alignment and misalignment in LVLMs through an explainability lens.
Outcome: The findings highlight the need for standardized evaluation protocols and in-depth explainability studies.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations