The Tail Wagging the Dog: Dataset Construction Biases of Social Bias Benchmarks (2023.acl-short)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | omnipresence of large pre-trained language models has fueled concerns regarding systematic biases carried over from underlying data into the applications they are used in. |
| Approach: | They propose to compare social biases with non-social biase masked by alternate constructions that maintain the essence of their social bias. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks underestimate or overestimate the social bias in a given model. |
Similar Papers
Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metrics (2021.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing fairness metrics quantify the differences in a model’s behaviour across a range of demographic groups. |
| Approach: | They propose to unify existing fairness metrics and compare them to three generalized fairness measures to reveal the connections between them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed measures can be explained by differences in parameter choices, and the results are consistent with previous studies. |
BBQ: A hand-built bias benchmark for question answering (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Alicia Parrish, Angelica Chen, Nikita Nangia, Vishakh Padmakumar, Jason Phang, Jana Thompson, Phu Mon Htut, Samuel Bowman
| Challenge: | NLP models learn social biases, but little work has been done on how these biase manifest in outputs for applied tasks like question answering (QA). |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset that highlights attested social biases against people belonging to protected classes along nine social dimensions relevant for U.S. English-speaking contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset highlights attested social biases against people belonging to protected classes along nine social dimensions relevant for U.S. English-speaking contexts. |
LLMs Are Biased Towards Output Formats! Systematically Evaluating and Mitigating Output Format Bias of LLMs (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Do Xuan Long, Ngoc-Hai Nguyen, Tiviatis Sim, Hieu Dao, Shafiq Joty, Kenji Kawaguchi, Nancy F. Chen, Min-Yen Kan
| Challenge: | Using format-following capabilities, state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) can be leveraged to tailor outputs to specific task formats. |
| Approach: | They propose to define a format bias evaluation metric and establish effective strategies to reduce it. |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation reduces the variance in ChatGPT’s performance among wrapping formats from 235.33 to 0.71 (%2) |
Bias in Language Models: Beyond Trick Tests and Towards RUTEd Evaluation (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Standard bias benchmarks are used for large language models to measure the association between social attributes and single-word outputs. |
| Approach: | They adapt three standard bias metrics of next-word prediction to measure gender-occupation bias and develop an analogous RUTEd evaluation in three contexts of real-world LLM use. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks are robust to lengthening model outputs via a more realistic user prompt in the domain of gender-occupation bias. |
Sense Embeddings are also Biased – Evaluating Social Biases in Static and Contextualised Sense Embeddings (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have evaluated social biases in word embeddings, but they are understudied. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate the social biases in sense embeddings using a benchmark dataset for word embedders. |
| Outcome: | The proposed measures show that even when no biases are found at word-level, there are still worrying levels of social biase at sense-level which are often ignored by the word- level bias evaluation measures. |
Bias and Fairness in Natural Language Processing (D19-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a tutorial will review the history of bias and fairness studies in machine learning and language processing . |
| Approach: | This tutorial reviews the history of bias and fairness studies in machine learning and language processing . it presents recent community effort to quantify and mitigat bias in natural language processing models . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial reviews the history of bias and fairness studies in machine learning and language processing . it aims to quantify and mitigate bias in natural language processing models for a wide spectrum of tasks . |
Blind Men and the Elephant: Diverse Perspectives on Gender Stereotypes in Benchmark Datasets (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for measuring gender stereotypical bias in language models are inconsistencies . lack of explicit standards in data gathering can have detrimental effects on results . |
| Approach: | They propose that currently available benchmarks capture only partial facets of gender stereotypes . they apply a framework from social psychology to balance data across components of gender stereotypes based on stereotypical benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves correlation between different benchmarks by using simple balancing techniques. |
Robust Bias Detection in MLMs and its Application to Human Trait Ratings (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to assess demographic bias in MLMs ignore random variability of templates and target concepts, and neglect bias quantification. |
| Approach: | They propose a systematic statistical approach to assess bias in MLMs using mixed models to account for random effects, pseudo-perplexity weights for sentences derived from templates and quantify bias using statistical effect sizes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method matches on bias scores in magnitude and direction with small to medium effect sizes. |
Cognitive Effects and Biases in Large Language Models (2026.eacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models. |
| Approach: | This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial bridges psychology and NLP to clarify cognitive effects and biases in large language models. |
Benchmarking Meta-embeddings: What Works and What Does Not (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to build meta-embeddings have been evaluated using a variety of methods and datasets, which makes it difficult to draw meaningful conclusions regarding the merits of each approach. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified framework for a fair and objective meta-embedding evaluation using intrinsic and extrinsic tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework outperforms existing methods on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation benchmarks and outperformed existing methods. |