A Survey on Asking Clarification Questions Datasets in Conversational Systems (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on Asking Clarification Questions (ACQs) are incomparable due to inconsistent data, experimental setups and evaluation strategies. |
| Approach: | They analyse the current research status on Asking Clarification Questions (ACQs) and propose a set of evaluation metrics and benchmarks for multiple ACQs-related tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed techniques are compared with the available datasets and evaluated against benchmarks. |
Similar Papers
Asking Clarification Questions in Knowledge-Based Question Answering (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing clarification datasets with limited annotated examples do not address ambiguous phenomena. |
| Approach: | They propose a dataset that allows users to ask clarification questions using open-domain examples. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves better performance than strong baselines and provides new challenges. |
ClarQ: A large-scale and diverse dataset for Clarification Question Generation (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing datasets hinder development of large-scale models capable of generating and utilising clarification questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a bootstrapping framework that utilises a neural network architecture to classify clarification questions based on post-comment tuples extracted from stackexchange. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework aims to increase the accuracy of the classifier and increase recall of clarification questions by applying it to question-answering tasks. |
Building and Evaluating Open-Domain Dialogue Corpora with Clarifying Questions (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances on neural approaches to natural language processing have triggered a renaissance in end-to-end neural open-domain chatbots. |
| Approach: | They propose to use offline and online steps to evaluate the quality of clarifying questions in various open-domain dialogues to improve the quality and accuracy of the system response. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline is suitable as a foundation for further research. |
Clarifying the Path to User Satisfaction: An Investigation into Clarification Usefulness (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Poorly formulated questions can lead to user frustration and dissatisfaction . |
| Approach: | They propose to leverage key features that contribute to the classification of clarifying questions, enhancing user satisfaction and system performance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves with a minimum performance boost of 45% in traditional classifiers, especially in large language models. |
Asking the Right Question at the Right Time: Human and Model Uncertainty Guidance to Ask Clarification Questions (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using model uncertainty as supervision for deciding when to ask may not be the most effective way to resolve model uncertainty. |
| Approach: | They propose to generate clarification questions based on model uncertainty estimation and compare it to several alternatives to generate questions . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the model uncertainty of a collaborative dialogue task and shows that it is more effective than other alternatives. |
A guide to the dataset explosion in QA, NLI, and commonsense reasoning (2020.coling-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a tutorial aims to provide an up-to-date guide to the recent datasets . the target audience is the NLP practitioners who are lost in dozens of the recent data sets. |
| Approach: | This tutorial provides an up-to-date guide to the recent datasets . it surveys old and new methodological issues with dataset construction . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial aims to provide an up-to-date guide to the recent datasets . it surveys the old and new methodological issues with dataset construction . |
Asking Clarification Questions to Handle Ambiguity in Open-Domain QA (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Ambiguous questions persist in open-domain question answering because formulating a precise question with a unique answer is often challenging. |
| Approach: | They propose to ask a clarification question where the user’s response will help identify the interpretation that best aligns with the user's intention. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves F1 of 61.3, 25.1, and 40.5 on the three tasks, demonstrating the need for further improvements while providing competitive baselines for future work. |
Medical Dialogue System: A Survey of Categories, Methods, Evaluation and Challenges (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Xiaoming Shi, Zeming Liu, Li Du, Yuxuan Wang, Hongru Wang, Yuhang Guo, Tong Ruan, Jie Xu, Xiaofan Zhang, Shaoting Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing medical dialogue systems have significant potential to simplify diagnostic procedure and reduce the cost of collecting information from patients. |
| Approach: | They analyze 325 papers from well-known computer science, natural language processing conferences and journals to find out the major challenges of medical dialog systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed systems have been surveyed in the medical community but have not been evaluated from a technical perspective. |
What Did You Refer to? Evaluating Co-References in Dialogue (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing neural end-to-end dialogue models have limitations on exactly interpreting the linguistic structures in dialogue history context. |
| Approach: | They propose to directly measure the capability of neural end-to-end dialogue models on understanding the entity-oriented structures via question answering. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can understand large-scale English and Chinese human human dialogues using a large-format dataset. |
Inconsistent dialogue responses and how to recover from them (2024.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to assess and bolster utterance consistency of chat systems have been shown difficult to detect. |
| Approach: | They propose to use annotators to write dialogue responses and recovery utterances to assess and bolster utteration consistency of chat systems. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset significantly improves the detection and resolution of inconsistencies in chat conversations. |