Scientia Potentia Est—On the Role of Knowledge in Computational Argumentation (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on argumentation models does not provide a systematic overview of the types of knowledge required in CA tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a taxonomy of the types of knowledge required in CA tasks . authors propose exploitation of these knowledge types for four main research areas . |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy proposes a systematic overview of the types of knowledge required in CA tasks. |
Similar Papers
Exploring the Potential of Large Language Models in Computational Argumentation (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation is an essential tool in various domains, including law, public policy, and artificial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLMs on various computational argumentation tasks . they organize existing tasks into six main categories and standardize the format of 14 datasets . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs well on argument mining and argument generation tasks. |
ArgBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Computational Argumentation Tasks (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation skills are an essential toolkit for large language models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate the generalizability of five LLM families across 46 computational argumentation tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates the generalizability of five LLM families across 46 computational argumentation tasks covering mining arguments, assessing perspectives, evaluating argument quality, reasoning about arguments, and generating arguments. |
Natural Language Reasoning in Large Language Models: Analysis and Evaluation (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentative reasoning presents unique challenges due to its reliance on context, implicit assumptions, and value judgments. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale evaluation of LLMs' unconstrained natural language reasoning capabilities . they formalise a new strategy designed to evaluate argumentative reasoning in LLM . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on a range of reasoning tasks than other models. |
Mining, Assessing, and Improving Arguments in NLP and the Social Sciences (2023.eacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a tutorial on argument quality assessment will focus on what makes an argument good or bad . argument quality is a field encompassing varying tasks on the automated analysis and synthesis of natural language arguments. |
| Approach: | This tutorial will focus on the assessment of argument quality across disciplines . authors will involve participants in annotation studies on the quality assessment . |
| Outcome: | The tutorial will focus on the assessment of argument quality across disciplines . it will involve participants in two annotation studies on the quality assessment and the improvement of quality . |
Employing Argumentation Knowledge Graphs for Neural Argument Generation (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for generating arguments use end-to-end knowledge graphs or are controlled with respect to the argument's topic, aspects, or stance. |
| Approach: | They construct and populate three knowledge graphs and encode them into debate portals and relevant paragraphs from Wikipedia. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model produces arguments with superior quality than those generated without knowledge. |
Argument Quality Assessment in the Age of Instruction-Following Large Language Models (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Henning Wachsmuth, Gabriella Lapesa, Elena Cabrio, Anne Lauscher, Joonsuk Park, Eva Maria Vecchi, Serena Villata, Timon Ziegenbein
| Challenge: | Argument quality assessment is critical for opinion formation, decision making, writing education, and the like. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large language models to leverage knowledge across contexts to enable a much more reliable assessment. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the quality of argumentation and the ability to leverage knowledge across contexts. |
Mining, Assessing, and Improving Arguments in NLP and the Social Sciences (2024.lrec-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a tutorial on computational argumentation is updated to address the problem of argument quality . argument quality is a field of interdisciplinary research that connects natural language processing to social sciences . |
| Approach: | They present an updated version of the EACL 2023 tutorial on argument quality . they will focus on the notions of argument quality across disciplines . |
| Outcome: | The updated version of the EACL 2023 tutorial focuses on argument quality assessment . the authors will focus on the interface between Argument Mining and Deliberation Theory . |
Learning Strategies for Robust Argument Mining: An Analysis of Variations in Language and Domain (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a complex process that requires a large amount of resources and time. |
| Approach: | They propose to analyze arguments in three different languages and domains to understand their robustness to natural language variations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed systems are more robust to natural language variations than existing arguments mining systems. |
Dynamic Knowledge Integration for Evidence-Driven Counter-Argument Generation with Large Language Models (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argumentation in natural language processing (NLP) is becoming an indispensable tool in many application domains such as public policy, law, medicine, and education. |
| Approach: | They propose a reconstructed dataset of argument and counter-argument pairs . they propose integrating dynamic external knowledge from the web to improve counter-arguments . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows stronger correlation with human judgments compared to reference-based metrics. |
Beyond Recognising Entailment: Formalising Natural Language Inference from an Argumentative Perspective (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for recognizing textual entailment lack a standardized definition of inference, making it difficult to compare methods trained on different datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a rigorous approach to align entailment recognition with argumentation theory by using a tool to assist humans in annotating arguments according to the PTA. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on a human-trained dataset and provides insights into non-expert annotator training. |