Andrew Lampinen, Ishita Dasgupta, Stephanie Chan, Kory Mathewson, Mh Tessler, Antonia Creswell, James McClelland, Jane Wang, Felix Hill
| Challenge: | Language Models can adapt to a few in-context examples, but without training. |
| Approach: | They examine how explanations of few-shot examples can help Language Models (LMs) explanations can improve performance even without tuning, they find . |
| Outcome: | The proposed explanations outperform hand-tuned explanations on small validation sets. |
Similar Papers
Complementary Explanations for Effective In-Context Learning (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have remarkable capabilities in learning from expla- nations in prompts, but there has been limited understanding of exactly how these explana- tions function or why they are effective. |
| Approach: | They propose a maximal marginal relevance-based exemplar selection approach to construct exemplar sets that are both relevant and comple- mentary. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves in- context learning performance across three tasks on multiple LLMs. |
FLamE: Few-shot Learning from Natural Language Explanations (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has shown limited utility of natural language explanations in improving classification. |
| Approach: | They propose a two-stage few-shot learning framework that generates explanations and fine-tunes a smaller model with generated explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework increases inference accuracy over strong baselines, but human evaluation reveals that the majority of generated explanations does not adequately justify classification decisions. |
Using Natural Language Explanations to Improve Robustness of In-context Learning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that large language models excel in many tasks via in-context learning (ICL). However, ICL struggles to execute complex tasks such as arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning. |
| Approach: | They propose to augment ICL with natural language explanations (NLEs) to produce further NLEs on adversarial datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach yields more accurate results than zero-shot-ICL and using only human-generated NLEs on eight adversarial datasets. |
Explanation in the Era of Large Language Models (2024.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Explanation has long been a part of communication, where humans use language to elucidate each other and transmit information about mechanisms of events. |
| Approach: | They review the opportunities and challenges of explanations in the era of large language models and examine how they can be used to generate explanations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are based on the models of large language models (LLMs) and their opaque nature. |
Language Models for Text Classification: Is In-Context Learning Enough? (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing research on text classification models with prompts is limited in scale and lacks understanding of how these methods compare to more established methods. |
| Approach: | They compare the performance of large and smaller language models with prompts to achieve state-of-the-art performance in many NLP tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform the more standard approaches in binary, multiclass, and multilabel tasks in a large scale evaluation of 16 text classification datasets. |
What Do Language Models Learn in Context? The Structured Task Hypothesis. (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained large language models have exhibited an impressive ability to learn in context across various domains, e.g., code generation, education, medicine and even medicine. |
| Approach: | They taxonomize existing candidate theories into three competing hypotheses that explain LLMs’ ability to learn in context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can learn a task from in-context examples presented in a demonstration and generalize it to the prompt. |
Explanation-aware Soft Ensemble Empowers Large Language Model In-context Learning (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yue Yu, Jiaming Shen, Tianqi Liu, Zhen Qin, Jing Nathan Yan, Jialu Liu, Chao Zhang, Michael Bendersky
| Challenge: | Recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) have witnessed the remarkable capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). |
| Approach: | They propose an Explanation-Aware Soft Ensemble framework to empower in-context learning with Large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can be used to enhance in-context learning on seven natural language understanding tasks and four varying-size LLMs. |
Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that the GPT-3 model can perform few-shots on language understanding tasks with a natural-language prompt and a few task demonstrations. |
| Approach: | They propose a technique for fine-tuning language models using a few examples . they propose LM-BFF, which uses prompt-based fine-uning and a pipeline for automating prompt generation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms standard fine-tuning procedures on a range of NLP tasks. |
How Can We Know What Language Models Know? (2020.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work examines knowledge contained in language models by having the LM fill in the blanks of prompts such as “Obama is a __ by profession”. |
| Approach: | They propose mining-based and paraphrasing-based methods to automatically generate high-quality and diverse prompts, as well as ensemble methods to combine answers from different prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve accuracy from 31.1% to 39.6% on the LAMA benchmark for extracting relational knowledge from LMs. |
oLMpics-On What Language Model Pre-training Captures (2020.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent success of pre-trained language models has spurred widespread interest in their capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose an evaluation protocol that includes zero-shot evaluation and no fine-tuning . they propose to compare the learning curve of a fine- tuned LM to the learning of multiple controls . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluation protocol compares the learning curve of a fine-tuned LM to the learning of multiple controls. |