ER-Test: Evaluating Explanation Regularization Methods for Language Models (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Explanation regularization (ER) aims to improve NLM generalization by pushing the NLM’s machine rationales to align with human rationale. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for evaluating ER models’ OOD generalization along three dimensions: unseen datasets, contrast set tests, and functional tests. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates ER models’ OOD generalization across unseen datasets, contrast set tests, and functional tests. |
Similar Papers
Explanation Regularisation through the Lens of Attributions (2025.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Explanation regularisation (ER) is a method to guide text classifiers to form their predictions relying on tokens that humans consider plausible. |
| Approach: | They introduce an auxiliary explanation loss to measure how well an input attribution technique's output agrees with human-annotated rationales. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves classification performance in out-of-domain (OOD) settings by relying on tokens humans consider plausible. |
Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Natural Language Processing: Past, Present, and Future (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Linyi Yang, Yaoxian Song, Xuan Ren, Chenyang Lyu, Yidong Wang, Jingming Zhuo, Lingqiao Liu, Jindong Wang, Jennifer Foster, Yue Zhang
| Challenge: | Existing literature on the generalization of machine learning models to out-of-distribution data is lacking. |
| Approach: | They propose to present the first comprehensive review of recent progress, methods, and evaluations on the generalization challenge from an OOD perspective in natural language understanding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed survey provides the first comprehensive review of recent progress, methods, and evaluations on the generalization challenge from an OOD perspective in natural language understanding. |
GLUE-X: Evaluating Natural Language Understanding Models from an Out-of-Distribution Generalization Perspective (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Linyi Yang, Shuibai Zhang, Libo Qin, Yafu Li, Yidong Wang, Hanmeng Liu, Jindong Wang, Xing Xie, Yue Zhang
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have improved generalization performance but the out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization problem remains a challenge in many NLP tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to create a benchmark for evaluating out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization in NLP models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks highlight the importance of OOD robustness and provide insights on how to measure it and improve it. |
Paragraph-level Rationale Extraction through Regularization: A case study on European Court of Human Rights Cases (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ilias Chalkidis, Manos Fergadiotis, Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, Nikolaos Aletras, Ion Androutsopoulos, Prodromos Malakasiotis
| Challenge: | Interpretability or explainability is an emerging field of research in NLP . experimental results indicate that the newly introduced task is very challenging . |
| Approach: | They propose to extract rationales as paragraphs in multi-paragraph structured court cases . they also propose a constraint that allows models to be more specific . |
| Outcome: | The proposed task is very challenging and there is a large scope for further research. |
Evaluating Historical Text Normalization Systems: How Well Do They Generalize? (N18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Historical text normalization systems aim to convert historical wordforms to their modern equivalents . many of these systems have been developed and tested on a single language . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a nave baseline system to evaluate historical text normalization systems . they show that the models generalize well to unseen words in tests on five languages . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generalize well to unseen words on five languages, but provide no clear benefit over the nave baseline. |
What to Learn, and How: Toward Effective Learning from Rationales (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Increasing interest in learning from rationales has led to the use of human-annotated explanations to inject useful inductive biases into models. |
| Approach: | They propose several novel loss functions and learning strategies to exploit human rationales to augment model prediction accuracy. |
| Outcome: | The proposed learning strategies improve on three datasets with human rationales and show that they are more efficient than baselines. |
Are Machine Rationales (Not) Useful to Humans? Measuring and Improving Human Utility of Free-text Rationales (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Brihi Joshi, Ziyi Liu, Sahana Ramnath, Aaron Chan, Zhewei Tong, Shaoliang Nie, Qifan Wang, Yejin Choi, Xiang Ren
| Challenge: | Existing metrics like task performance of the LM generating the rationales or similarity between generated and gold rationale are not good indicators of their human utility. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large language model to generate rationales with better human utility by estimating its conciseness and novelty. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can measure human utility to a better extent by estimating its usefulness in answering similar unseen instances. |
What if you said that differently?: How Explanation Formats Affect Human Feedback Efficacy and User Perception (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Question answering models can often be black boxes, as their reasoning process is mostly opaque. |
| Approach: | They analyze the effect of rationales generated by QA models on user feedback and how well they enable users to understand and trust model answers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be used to improve model responses by removing feedback from end users and enhancing model outputs by using natural language feedback. |
Blackbird language matrices (BLM), a new task for rule-like generalization in neural networks: Can Large Language Models pass the test? (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to evaluate large language models for generalization lack generalization ability . current methods for evaluating LLMs are based on tests of human intelligence . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a language task to evaluate large language models' generalisation ability . they propose to ask LLMs to solve simple variants of the RAVEN IQ test . |
| Outcome: | The proposed task can be used to evaluate the generalisation ability of large language models . it shows that current generative models can handle the task in the sense that they understand instructions . |
Do Generalisation Results Generalise? (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies evaluating generalisation performance on large language models focuses on a single out-of-distribution dataset . |
| Approach: | They examine whether OOD generalisation results generalise across multiple OOD testsets throughout a finetuning run and then evaluate the partial correlation of results . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves high scores on multiple OOD testsets, regressing out in-domain performance. |