Probing for Incremental Parse States in Autoregressive Language Models (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on autoregressive language models shows impressive command of syntax . implicit incremental syntactic inferences underlie next-word predictions . |
| Approach: | They propose a probe for extracting incomplete syntactic structure from autoregressive language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed probes can predict model preferences on ambiguous sentence prefixes and causally intervene on model representations and steer model behavior. |
Similar Papers
Overestimation of Syntactic Representation in Neural Language Models (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several testing methodologies have been developed to probe models’ syntactic representations. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to determine syntactic structure by training a model on strings generated according to a template and testing its ability to distinguish between similar ones with different syntax. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reproduces positive results with two non-syntactic baseline language models: an n-gram model and an LSTM model trained on scrambled inputs. |
Learned Incremental Representations for Parsing (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new syntactic representation that commits to syntakic choices is proposed for humans . we use a system that uses only incremental processing of a prefix to predict the word in a sentence . |
| Approach: | They propose a syntactic representation that commits to syntakic choices incrementally . they say the system can achieve 93.72 F1 on the Penn Treebank with as few as 5 bits per word . |
| Outcome: | The proposed representation achieves 93.72 F1 on the Penn Treebank with as few as 5 bits per word . the analysis of the representations shows they have interpretable features and deferred resolution of syntactic ambiguities. |
Neural language models as psycholinguistic subjects: Representations of syntactic state (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study examines the extent to which neural network language models reflect incremental representations of syntactic state . we examine neural network model behavior on sentences chosen to probe specific aspects of the learned representations . |
| Approach: | They employ experimental methodologies developed in psycholinguistics to study syntactic representation in the human mind. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are trained on large datasets and only sensitive to subtle cues . the results raise questions about the accuracy of the models and their performance . |
Explicitly Modeling Syntax in Language Models with Incremental Parsing and a Dynamic Oracle (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Failing to capture the structure of input language could lead to generalization problems and over-parametrization. |
| Approach: | They propose a new syntax-aware language model that explicitly models the structure with an incremental parser and maintains the conditional probability setting of a standard language model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can achieve strong results in language modeling, parsing, and syntactic generalization tests while using fewer parameters than other models. |
Enriching Non-Autoregressive Transformer with Syntactic and Semantic Structures for Neural Machine Translation (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing non-autoregressive models have boosted the efficiency of neural machine translation, but their performance is significantly worse than that of autoregressive counterparts. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate syntactic and semantic structures among natural languages into a non-autoregressive Transformer for the task of neural machine translation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves faster speed and keeps translation quality compared with other models. |
Incremental Sentence Processing Mechanisms in Autoregressive Transformer Language Models (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study has found LMs focus on processing syntactic relations, but not structural information. |
| Approach: | They examine the mechanisms underlying garden path sentence processing in LMs . they use sparse autoencoders to identify interpretable features that determine which continuation . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model lacks syntactic features and shallow heuristics to perform incremental sentence processing. |
Probing for Constituency Structure in Neural Language Models (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using standard probing techniques, we examine whether contextual neural language models implicitly learn syntactic structure. |
| Approach: | They investigate to which extent contextual neural language models implicitly learn syntactic structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to represent constituents of different categories within the neuron activations of a LM such as RoBERTa with high performance even on manipulated data. |
When Does Syntax Mediate Neural Language Model Performance? Evidence from Dropout Probes (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies show that models encode syntactic information redundantly . this allows researchers to boost models' performance by injecting syntaktic information into embeddings . |
| Approach: | They propose a new probe design that guides probes to consider all syntactic information present in embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance by injecting syntactic information into models. |
A Targeted Assessment of Incremental Processing in Neural Language Models and Humans (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using by-word reaction time data, we compare incremental processing in humans and neural language models across a range of structural phenomena. |
| Approach: | They propose to scale up incremental processing in humans and language models by collecting by-word reaction time data for 16 different syntactic test suites. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outputs match human and model accuracy scores, but underpredict the difference in magnitude of incremental processing difficulty between grammatical and ungrammatically-spaced sentences. |
What if This Modified That? Syntactic Interventions with Counterfactual Embeddings (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prior art aims to uncover meaningful properties within model representations, but it is unclear how faithfully such probes portray information that the models actually use. |
| Approach: | They propose a technique for generating counterfactual embeddings within models . they produce evidence that some models use a tree-distancelike representation of syntax . |
| Outcome: | The proposed technique produces evidence that some models use tree-distancelike representations of syntax in downstream prediction tasks. |