Maieutic Prompting: Logically Consistent Reasoning with Recursive Explanations (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Jaehun Jung, Lianhui Qin, Sean Welleck, Faeze Brahman, Chandra Bhagavatula, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin Choi
| Challenge: | Pre-trained language models struggle with consistent reasoning, and prompting methods are often noisy and inconsistent. |
| Approach: | They propose a few-shot inference method inspired by the Socratic way of conversation that generates a tree of explanations that bear logical relations between each other and frames it as a satisfiability problem. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 20% better accuracy than state-of-the-art prompting methods and performs competitively with supervised models. |
Similar Papers
Reasoning with Language Model Prompting: A Survey (2023.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Shuofei Qiao, Yixin Ou, Ningyu Zhang, Xiang Chen, Yunzhi Yao, Shumin Deng, Chuanqi Tan, Fei Huang, Huajun Chen
| Challenge: | Reasoning is an essential ability for complex problem-solving and can provide back-end support for various real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They present cutting-edge research on reasoning with language model prompting and provide systematic resources to help beginners. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approaches have not been systematically reviewed and analyzed. |
Tree Prompting: Efficient Task Adaptation without Fine-Tuning (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained language models (LMs) are the main interface for applying them to new tasks, but their large size makes them difficult to fine-tune with gradients for specific downstream tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use training data to form a decision tree based on prompt-LM calls, with each prompt determined by the outcomes of previous calls. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves accuracy over competing methods and is competitive with fine-tuning. |
Teaching-Inspired Integrated Prompting Framework: A Novel Approach for Enhancing Reasoning in Large Language Models (2025.coling-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across various domains but struggle with arithmetic reasoning tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a Teaching-Inspired Integrated Prompting Framework which emulates the instructional process of a teacher guiding students. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework improves reasoning accuracy on nine benchmarks. |
How Interpretable are Reasoning Explanations from Prompting Large Language Models? (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Prompt Engineering has garnered significant attention for enhancing the performance of large language models across a multitude of tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a simple prompting technique that yields more than 70% improvement in interpretability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves interpretability by 70% across multiple dimensions. |
Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoning (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiacheng Liu, Alisa Liu, Ximing Lu, Sean Welleck, Peter West, Ronan Le Bras, Yejin Choi, Hannaneh Hajishirzi
| Challenge: | Existing methods for commonsense reasoning rely on high-quality knowledge, but they are often dominated by large-scale pretrained models that are fine-tuned on a target benchmark. |
| Approach: | They develop generated knowledge prompting which generates knowledge from a language model and provides it as additional input when answering a question. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves state-of-the-art models on four commonsense reasoning tasks. |
Mapping the Course for Prompt-based Structured Prediction (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models have demonstrated strong performance in a wide-range of language tasks without task-specific fine-tuning. |
| Approach: | They combine large language models with combinatorial inference to marry predictive power of LLMs with structural consistency provided by inference methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model incorporates symbolic inference to provide consistent and accurate predictions on challenging tasks. |
Prompting for explanations improves Adversarial NLI. Is this true? {Yes} it is {true} because {it weakens superficial cues} (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Explanation prompts are used to generate an explanation for a given input . they are also used to improve model performance on adversarial benchmarks . |
| Approach: | They propose to use explanation prompts to generate an explanation that supports a label . they argue that prompting for explanations weakens superficial cues . |
| Outcome: | The proposed explanation prompts outperform label-only prompts on adversarial benchmarks. |
“Well, Keep Thinking”: Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Adaptive Injection Decoding (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) exhibit strong reasoning abilities, often attributed to few-shot or zero-shot Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting. |
| Approach: | They propose a decoding strategy that nudges LLMs to continue reasoning, thereby preventing immature reasoning processes. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method significantly improves LLM reasoning capabilities on diverse reasoning benchmarks. |
Prompting Contrastive Explanations for Commonsense Reasoning Tasks (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large pretrained language models (PLMs) can achieve near-human performance on commonsense reasoning tasks, but provide little human-interpretable evidence of the underlying reasoning they use. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large pretrained language models to generate evidence for commonsense reasoning NLP tasks . they use models to contrast alternative explanations based on key attribute(s) required to justify the correct answer . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves performance on two commonsense reasoning benchmarks compared to previous non-contrastive alternatives. |
What Makes a Good Natural Language Prompt? (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies on prompt quality show imbalanced support across models and tasks, and research gaps. |
| Approach: | They propose a property- and human-centric framework for evaluating prompt quality . they propose comparing prompt quality to other factors such as adverbs and apverbs . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework reveals imbalanced support across models and tasks and substantial research gaps. |