| Challenge: | Argument mining is a natural language processing task that seeks to obtain structured arguments from unstructured text. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a transfer learning methodology to assess the potential of argument mining knowledge with confluent tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method dispenses with heavy feature and model engineering and allows for new state-of-the-art performance for its three main sub-tasks. |
Similar Papers
Multilingual Argument Mining: Datasets and Analysis (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining tasks in non-English languages are dominated by English . we use a pre-trained language model that supports 104 languages to train models . |
| Approach: | They propose a multilingual BERT model to address argument mining tasks in non-English languages . they use English datasets and machine translation to facilitate transfer learning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is well suited for classifying the stance of arguments and detecting evidence, but less so for assessing the quality of arguments. |
Can Unsupervised Knowledge Transfer from Social Discussions Help Argument Mining? (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for argument mining are limited by the scarcity of manually annotated data and the highly domain-dependent nature of argumentation. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel transfer learning strategy to fine tune pretrained Transformer-based Language Models on a selectively masked language modeling task and a new prompt-based strategy for inter-component relation prediction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms existing models on both within- and out-of-domain datasets while leveraging on the discourse context. |
Efficient Argument Structure Extraction with Transfer Learning and Active Learning (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Identifying and understanding the argumentative discourse structure in text has been a critical task in argument mining. |
| Approach: | They propose a context-aware Transformer-based argument structure prediction model that outperforms models that rely on features or only encode limited contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms models that rely on features or encode limited contexts on five domains and on peer reviews on five different domains. |
ArgumenText: Searching for Arguments in Heterogeneous Sources (N18-5)
Copied to clipboard
Christian Stab, Johannes Daxenberger, Chris Stahlhut, Tristan Miller, Benjamin Schiller, Christopher Tauchmann, Steffen Eger, Iryna Gurevych
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a core technology for enabling argument search in large corpora . but current methods fail when applied to heterogeneous texts . despite its obvious applications, argument search has attracted relatively little attention . |
| Approach: | They propose a system that searches sentential arguments for any given topic . ArgumenText automatically identifies and classifies arguments by relevance . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system covers 89% of arguments found in expert-curated lists . it also identifies additional valid arguments omitted or overlooked by human curators . |
Advances in Argument Mining (P19-4)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a rapidly growing area of research and research that has seen significant growth over the past few years. |
| Approach: | Argument mining is a new area of research that uses opinion mining to extract opinions . the 6th ACL workshop on argument mining will be in Florence in 2019 . |
| Outcome: | Argument mining is a new area of research and development that has seen significant growth in the past three years. |
Limited Generalizability in Argument Mining: State-Of-The-Art Models Learn Datasets, Not Arguments (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Identifying arguments is a prerequisite for various tasks in automated discourse analysis. |
| Approach: | They evaluate four BERT-like transformers on 17 English sentence-level datasets . they find that they tend to rely on lexical shortcuts tied to content words . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform best on 17 English sentence-level datasets on common tasks, but their performance drops when applied to unseen datasets. |
A Neural Transition-based Model for Argumentation Mining (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for identifying argumentation structures are inefficient and class imbalanced. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural transition-based model that incrementally builds an argumentation graph by generating a sequence of actions. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can handle tree and non-tree structured argumentation without structural constraints. |
Uncovering Implicit Inferences for Improved Relational Argument Mining (2023.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining attempts to extract arguments and their structure from unstructured texts. |
| Approach: | They propose a generative neuro-symbolic approach to finding inference chains that connect argument pairs by using the Commonsense Transformer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms the state-of-the-art by 2-5% in F1 score on three datasets. |
Unsupervised Argumentation Mining in Student Essays (2020.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art argumentation mining systems rely on annotated training data and are supervised, thus relying on an annotation of the components and relationships between them. |
| Approach: | They propose to bootstrap from a small set of argument components automatically identified using simple heuristics in combination with reliable contextual cues. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach outperforms two supervised baselines and achieves 73.5-83.7% of the performance of a state-of-the-art neural approach. |
AMPERSAND: Argument Mining for PERSuAsive oNline Discussions (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining is a field of corpus-based discourse analysis that involves the automatic identification of argumentative structures in text. |
| Approach: | They propose a computational model for argument mining in online persuasive discussion forums that brings together the micro-level (argument as product) and macro-level models of argumentation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on existing models using pointer networks and a pre-trained language model. |