Challenge: Pretrained language models exhibit sociodemographic biases, such as against gender and race, raising concerns of downstream biase in language technologies.
Approach: They propose to use word embedding-based and transformer-based PLMs to test for the presence of biases against people with disabilities (PWDs)
Outcome: The proposed models favor ableist language, despite their sociodemographic biases against race and gender.

Similar Papers

Addressing Healthcare-related Racial and LGBTQ+ Biases in Pretrained Language Models (2024.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pretrained language models (PLMs) propagate social stigmas and stereotypes, a critical concern given their widespread use.
Approach: They adapt two intrinsic bias benchmarks to quantify racial and LGBTQ+ biases in prevalent PLMs and empirically evaluate the effectiveness of various debiasing methods in mitigating these biase.
Outcome: The proposed methods reduce biases without compromising performance in downstream tasks.
Unpacking the Interdependent Systems of Discrimination: Ableist Bias in NLP Systems through an Intersectional Lens (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Statistically significant results demonstrate that people with disabilities can be disadvantaged.
Approach: They used a large-scale BERT language model to predict word predictions and found that people with disabilities can be disadvantaged.
Outcome: The results show that people with disabilities can be disadvantaged and that gender and race identities can be discriminated against.
A Predictive Factor Analysis of Social Biases and Task-Performance in Pretrained Masked Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Various types of social biases have been reported with pretrained Masked Language Models (MLMs) in prior work.
Approach: They conduct a comprehensive study on 39 pretrained MLMs to examine their model factors and their social biases.
Outcome: The proposed model factors influence social biases learned by an MLM and their downstream task performance.
Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilities (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: toxicity prediction and sentiment analysis models perpetuate undesirable social biases from the data on which they are trained.
Approach: They propose to use toxicity prediction and sentiment analysis to examine whether NLP models perpetuate undesirable biases towards mentions of disability.
Outcome: The proposed models contain undesirable biases towards mentions of disability in two English language models.
StereoSet: Measuring stereotypical bias in pretrained language models (2021.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing literature on stereotypical biases in language models is limited . current evaluations focus on measuring bias without considering language modeling ability .
Approach: They propose to measure stereotypical biases in four domains: gender, profession, race, and religion . they compare stereotypical and language modeling ability of popular models like BERT, GPT-2, RoBERTa and XLnet .
Outcome: The proposed model shows strong stereotypical biases in gender, profession, race, and religion domains.
From Pretraining Data to Language Models to Downstream Tasks: Tracking the Trails of Political Biases Leading to Unfair NLP Models (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Hundreds of studies have highlighted ethical issues in NLP models .
Approach: They propose to measure media biases in LMs trained on diverse data sources . they focus on hate speech and misinformation detection .
Outcome: The proposed methods quantify the fairness of downstream NLP models trained on politically biased LMs.
Towards a Comprehensive Understanding and Accurate Evaluation of Societal Biases in Pre-Trained Transformers (2021.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing pre-trained language models are not fully considered for societal biases . pre-training models can be useful for many NLP tasks, but they can be harmful when used at scale.
Approach: They investigate gender and racial bias across pre-trained language models . they evaluate bias within pre-trainers using three metrics: WEAT, sequence likelihood, and pronoun ranking.
Outcome: The proposed model fails to detect gender and racial biases in pre-trained models . the model is ineffective when word embedding, demonstrating the need for more robust bias testing in transformers.
MAFIA: Multi-Adapter Fused Inclusive Language Models (2024.eacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Pretrained Language Models (PLMs) are widely used in NLP for various tasks.
Approach: They propose to modularly debias a pre-trained language model across multiple bias dimensions using structured knowledge and a large generative model.
Outcome: The proposed model is able to debias a pre-trained language model across multiple bias dimensions in a semi-automated way.
Are Language Models Agnostic to Linguistically Grounded Perturbations? A Case Study of Indic Languages (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies do not focus on linguistically grounded attacks, but pre-trained models are susceptible to these perturbations.
Approach: They propose to examine whether pre-trained language models are agnostic to linguistically grounded attacks . they find that PLMs are less susceptible to linguistic perturbations than non-linguistic ones .
Outcome: The proposed model is agnostic to linguistically grounded attacks, but is less susceptible to linguist attacks than non-linguistic models.
Assessing Combinational Generalization of Language Models in Biased Scenarios (2022.aacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work focuses on assessing in-domain knowledge, but shedding light on what pre-trained Language Models learn is important.
Approach: They propose a method to assess a PLM's generalization capacity in biased scenarios by combining component combinations where it could be easy for the PLMs to learn shortcuts from the training corpus.
Outcome: The proposed model can overcome distribution shifts in the training corpus and with sufficient data.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations