Challenge: Existing summarization models are limited in measuring the factual inconsistency of generated summaries.
Approach: They propose a decoder overconfidence-regularizing objective as a hallucination risk measurement to better estimate the quality of generated summaries.
Outcome: The proposed metric is reference-free and requires no training or modules . it records state-of-the-art correlation to human judgment on three sets of summary-quality annotations.

Similar Papers

ACUEval: Fine-grained Hallucination Evaluation and Correction for Abstractive Summarization (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent-proposed evaluation metrics for large language models have a preference-bias . however, such metrics often lack interpretability and only offer a single score .
Approach: They propose a metric that leverages the power of large language models to perform two sub-tasks: decomposing summaries into atomic content units and validating them against the source document.
Outcome: The proposed metric improves faithfulness scores on three summarization evaluation benchmarks by 3% compared to the next-best metric.
FaithBench: A Diverse Hallucination Benchmark for Summarization by Modern LLMs (2025.naacl-short)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluations of hallucinations in large language models suffer from a lack of diversity and recency in the LLM and LLM families considered.
Approach: They propose a summarization hallucination benchmark that challenges models to disagree on hallucines . they use models to generate answers or summaries from textual input .
Outcome: The proposed model combines the best of 10 modern LLMs with ground truth annotations.
On Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive Summarization (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing conditional text generation models produce unfaithful and unfaithed summaries . current models accomplish a high level of fluency and coherence .
Approach: They propose to use pretrained models for document summarization to better understand hallucinations . they find that textual entailment measures better correlate with faithfulness .
Outcome: The proposed models generate faithful and factual summaries as evaluated by humans.
TofuEval: Evaluating Hallucinations of LLMs on Topic-Focused Dialogue Summarization (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLMs hallucinate significant amounts of factual errors in the dialogue domain, regardless of the model’s size.
Approach: They propose to evaluate topic-focused dialogue summarization by using large language models (LLMs) they use human annotations to evaluate factual consistency and explain factually inconsistent sentences.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation benchmark on topic-focused dialogue summarization shows that existing LLMs hallucinate significant amounts of factual errors regardless of the model’s size.
Evaluating LLMs’ Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models generate coherent text and follow instructions across diverse tasks, but a critical challenge in scaling LLM applications is hallucination, where the generated content lacks factual grounding or deviates from the intended discourse context.
Approach: They use summarization as a representative task to evaluate LLMs' capability in detecting mixed-context hallucinations, specifically distinguishing between factual and non-factual hallucinos.
Outcome: The proposed model distinguishes between factual and non-factual hallucinations, and their performance bottlenecks.
From Single to Multi: How LLMs Hallucinate in Multi-Document Summarization (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study investigated hallucinations in multi-document summarization tasks . but, it is unclear how challenges arising from handling multiple documents affect outputs .
Approach: They investigate how hallucinations manifest in large language models when summarizing topic-specific information from a set of documents.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks show that the models generate more hallucinations than baselines . the results highlight the need for more effective approaches to mitigate hallucinosity in MDS .
FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMs (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for text summarization evaluation do not correlate well with human judgments . evaluators that use Likert scale scores are limited in their ability to perform deeper analysis.
Approach: They propose a fine-grained evaluator specifically tailored for the summarization task using large language models.
Outcome: The proposed method improves on open-source and proprietary LLMs and shows better completeness and conciseness than existing methods.
Mutual Information Alleviates Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summarization models exhibit the tendency to hallucinate, i.e., output content not supported by the source document.
Approach: They propose a decoding strategy that optimizes for pointwise mutual information of source and target tokens when models exhibit uncertainty.
Outcome: The proposed method decreases the probability of hallucinated tokens while maintaining the Rouge and BERT-S scores of top-performing decoding strategies.
Reducing Quantity Hallucinations in Abstractive Summarization (2020.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Abstractive summaries are subject to hallucination, but they are not very informative.
Approach: They propose to use a beam-worth of abstractive summaries to up-rank summary that is not supported by the original text.
Outcome: The proposed system up-ranks summaries whose quantity terms are supported by the original text without losing Recall, and shows higher Precision.
Entity-level Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarization (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing models exhibit entity hallucination, generating names of entities that are not present in the source document.
Approach: They propose to use entity-level factual consistency to improve model quality . they propose to filter the training data to reduce entity hallucination problem .
Outcome: The proposed model can reduce the entity hallucination problem by filtering the training data.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations