Re-contextualizing Fairness in NLP: The Case of India (2022.aacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent research has revealed undesirable biases in NLP data and models . however, these efforts focus of social disparities in the West and are not directly portable to other geo-cultural contexts.
Approach: They propose a framework to re-contextualize NLP fairness research for the Indian context . they build resources for fairness evaluation in the Indian and delve deeper into social stereotypes for Region and Religion .
Outcome: The proposed framework can be generalized to other geo-cultural contexts.

Similar Papers

FairI Tales: Evaluation of Fairness in Indian Contexts with a Focus on Bias and Stereotypes (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on fairness of LLMs are largely Western-focused, making them inadequate for culturally diverse countries such as India.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate fairness of LLMs across 85 identity groups . they consult domain experts to curate over 1,800 socio-cultural topics .
Outcome: The benchmark evaluates LLMs across 85 identities across 85 castes, religions, regions, and tribes.
Evaluating the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion of NLP Technology: A Case Study for Indian Languages (2023.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: In order for NLP technology to be widely applicable, fair, and useful, it needs to serve a diverse set of speakers across the world’s languages, be equitable, not unduly biased towards any particular language, and be inclusive of all users.
Approach: They propose to use Gini coefficient to assess NLP across all three dimensions to assess diversity, equity, and inclusion across all languages.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation paradigm assesses NLP technologies across all three dimensions and identifies the need for regional-specific choices in model building and dataset creation.
Fair Enough: Standardizing Evaluation and Model Selection for Fairness Research in NLP (2023.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Modern NLP systems exhibit a range of biases, which a growing literature on model debiasing attempts to correct.
Approach: They propose to clarify the current situation and plot a course for meaningful progress in fair learning by making clear inter-relations among the current gamut of methods and their relation to fairness theory.
Outcome: The proposed approach addresses the practical problem of model selection, which involves a trade-off between fairness and accuracy and has led to systemic issues in fairness research.
Bias and Fairness in Natural Language Processing (D19-2)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a tutorial will review the history of bias and fairness studies in machine learning and language processing .
Approach: This tutorial reviews the history of bias and fairness studies in machine learning and language processing . it presents recent community effort to quantify and mitigat bias in natural language processing models .
Outcome: This tutorial reviews the history of bias and fairness studies in machine learning and language processing . it aims to quantify and mitigate bias in natural language processing models for a wide spectrum of tasks .
Quantifying Social Biases in NLP: A Generalization and Empirical Comparison of Extrinsic Fairness Metrics (2021.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing fairness metrics quantify the differences in a model’s behaviour across a range of demographic groups.
Approach: They propose to unify existing fairness metrics and compare them to three generalized fairness measures to reveal the connections between them.
Outcome: The proposed measures can be explained by differences in parameter choices, and the results are consistent with previous studies.
NLP Needs Diversity outside of ‘Diversity’ (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a new position paper argues that diversity in NLP is concentrated on a small number of areas surrounding fairness .
Approach: a new position paper argues that diversity in NLP is disproportionately concentrated on fairness areas.
Outcome: a new position paper argues that diversity in NLP is disproportionately concentrated on fairness areas.
Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges (2023.findings-eacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language models are inequitable at encoding and re-presentation, but there is much to be studied and criticism for the existing research that remains to be addressed.
Approach: They propose to survey fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts . they argue that it is infeasible to achieve comprehensive coverage in terms of fairness datasets based on English .
Outcome: The proposed methods are infeasible to scale across languages and cultures, the authors argue . they argue that the current methods are too narrowly focused on specific dimensions and types of biases and cannot scale across cultures.
Socially Aware Bias Measurements for Hindi Language Representations (2022.naacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Language representations are an efficient tool used across NLP, but they are strife with encoded societal biases.
Approach: They investigate the encoded biases in Hindi language representations based on cultural and historical contexts . they emphasize the necessity of social-awareness along with linguistic and grammatical artefacts when modeling language representation .
Outcome: The proposed model reflects the cultural and cultural diversity of the region in which it is used . the model is based on the language and culture of the language being used based upon the study .
Global Voices, Local Biases: Socio-Cultural Prejudices across Languages (2023.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on human biases are heavily skewed towards Western and European languages . despite growing interest in language models, there are several shortcomings in the literature .
Approach: They scale the Word Embedding Association Test to 24 languages and add culturally relevant information for each language.
Outcome: The proposed language models can reflect and often amplify the effects of bias across linguistic, cultural, and societal borders.
Fairness Beyond Performance: Revealing Reliability Disparities Across Groups in Legal NLP (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows that models often make less reliable or overconfident predictions for marginalized groups.
Approach: They evaluate performance and reliability disparities across demographic, regional, and legal attributes across four jurisdictions using the FairLex benchmark.
Outcome: The FairLex benchmark shows that pre-training improves performance and reliability for underrepresented groups.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations