| Challenge: | Recent approaches to data-to-text generation adopt the encoder-decoder architecture . however, these models perform poorly at selecting appropriate content and ordering it coherently . |
| Approach: | They propose a neural model with a macro planning stage followed by a generation stage . they use data from databases of records, simulations of physical systems, accounting spreadsheets . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines on two data-to-text benchmarks . it uses the encoderdecoder architecture and is compared with existing models . |
Similar Papers
Step-by-Step: Separating Planning from Realization in Neural Data-to-Text Generation (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern neural generation systems conflate these two steps into a single end-to-end differentiable system. |
| Approach: | They propose to split the generation process into a symbolic text-planning stage that is faithful to the input, followed by a neural generation stage that focuses only on realization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves reliability and adequacy while maintaining fluent output. |
Data-to-text Generation with Variational Sequential Planning (2022.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in data-to-text generation have greatly facilitated the task of generating textual output from non-linguistic input. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural model enhanced with a planning component responsible for organizing high-level information in a coherent and meaningful way. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baseline models and is sample-efficient in the face of limited training data. |
Plan-then-Generate: Controlled Data-to-Text Generation via Planning (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on producing results that are close to the references, i.e. what to generate and in what order (the output structure) cannot be explicitly controlled by the users. |
| Approach: | They propose a Plan-then-Generate framework to improve the controllability of neural data-to-text models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can control both the intra-sentence and inter-sentent structure of the generated output. |
Data-to-text Generation with Entity Modeling (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to data-to-text generation have shown great promise thanks to the use of large-scale datasets and the application of neural network architectures which are trained end-to end. |
| Approach: | They propose an entity-centric neural architecture for data-to-text generation which uses hierarchical attention to create entity-specific representations which are dynamically updated. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines in automatic and human evaluation on the RotoWire benchmark and a five-times larger dataset on the baseball domain. |
Sentence-Level Content Planning and Style Specification for Neural Text Generation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in text generation systems often produce incoherent and unfaithful outputs . a novel automated text generation system takes into account content selection, text planning, and surface realization. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end trained two-step text generation model that considers sentence-level content planners and language styles. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms competing models in three domains with diverse topics and varying language styles. |
Text Generation with Exemplar-based Adaptive Decoding (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirical results show that the proposed model achieves strong performance and outperforms comparable baselines. |
| Approach: | They propose a conditioned text generation model that uses a template-based approach to generate content from input text. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms baselines on abstractive text summarization and data-to-text generation. |
Learning to Select, Track, and Generate for Data-to-Text (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
Hayate Iso, Yui Uehara, Tatsuya Ishigaki, Hiroshi Noji, Eiji Aramaki, Ichiro Kobayashi, Yusuke Miyao, Naoaki Okazaki, Hiroya Takamura
| Challenge: | Existing models often refer to the same data record multiple times. |
| Approach: | They propose a data-to-text generation model with two modules, one for tracking and the other for text generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models even without writer information in all evaluation metrics and contributes to content planning and surface realization. |
Learning Neural Templates for Text Generation (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Encoder-decoder models are uninterpretable and difficult to control in terms of content. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural generation system using a hidden semi-markov model which learns latent templates jointly with learning to generate. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model learns useful templates and achieves strong performance nearing that of encoder-decoder models. |
Select and Attend: Towards Controllable Content Selection in Text Generation (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent neural network models conflate content selection and surface realization into a black-box architecture, resulting in content to be described in text cannot be explicitly controlled. |
| Approach: | They propose to decouple content selection from the decoder to allow finer-grained control over the generation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be trained end-to-end without human annotations and achieves promising results in data-totext and headline generation tasks. |
Have Your Text and Use It Too! End-to-End Neural Data-to-Text Generation with Semantic Fidelity (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | End-to-end neural data-totext generation has faced challenges generalizing to new domains and generating semantically consistent text. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural data-to-text generation system that makes minimal assumptions about the data representation and target domain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system achieves state of the art results on four major D2T datasets with better semantic fidelity than the state-of-the-art methods. |