| Challenge: | AMR is abstract and conceptual, while EDS is low level, closer to the lexical structures of the given sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose to add EDS graphs as additional semantic features to AMR parsers by adding transition-based parser to add LSTM layer and GCN layer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed parser adds EDS graphs as additional semantic features to boost performance . Currently the parsing accuracies for AMR are in low 80s, while they can be improved by adding more information from EDS. |
Similar Papers
Dependency Patterns of Complex Sentences and Semantic Disambiguation for Abstract Meaning Representation Parsing (2021.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a sentence-level meaning representation based on predicate argument structure. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dictionary to capture the structure of complex sentences . they train models on data derived from AMR and Wikipedia corpus . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model will be made public and the proposed patterns will be validated. |
Exploring Semantics in Pretrained Language Model Attention (2024.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstract Meaning Representations (AMRs) encode the semantics of sentences in the form of graphs. |
| Approach: | They propose to use attention heads of two LMs to detect semantic relations encoded in AMRs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models detect semantic relations without fine tuning, using both unsupervised and supervised learning techniques. |
MASSIVE Multilingual Abstract Meaning Representation: A Dataset and Baselines for Hallucination Detection (2024.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Abstract Meaning Representation (AMR) is a semantic formalism that captures the core meaning of an utterance. |
| Approach: | They propose to use AMR to map meanings of 1,685 utterances to 50+ languages to build a dataset 20 times larger than existing resources. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset covers more languages, has more utterances, and has localized or translated entities for each language. |
Evaluating Universal Dependency Parser Recovery of Predicate Argument Structure via CompChain Analysis (2021.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Compchains are a categorization of the hierarchy of predicate dependency relations present within a UD parse. |
| Approach: | They introduce compchains, a categorization of the hierarchy of predicate dependency relations present within a UD parse. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs poorly on sentences with predicate-argument structure with more than one level of embedding. |
JSEEGraph: Joint Structured Event Extraction as Graph Parsing (2023.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches model event extraction using simplified datasets or sequence-labeling-based encodings. |
| Approach: | They propose a graph-based event extraction framework that explicitly encodes entities and events in a single semantic graph. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can handle nested event structures and solve different IE tasks jointly. |
DRS Parsing as Sequence Labeling (2022.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new semantic parser for English, German, Italian, and Dutch discourse representation structures is developed . we present a system that maps tokens to finite set of meaning fragments and is more transparent . a comprehensive error analysis highlights areas for future work on semantic parses . |
| Approach: | They propose a fully trainable semantic parser for English, German, Italian, and Dutch discourse representation structures that maps each token to one of a finite set of meaning fragments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is more transparent and useful for human-in-the-loop annotations. |
One Semantic Parser to Parse Them All: Sequence to Sequence Multi-Task Learning on Semantic Parsing Datasets (2021.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing semantic parsing datasets lack a single standard for meaning representations . lack of a standard led to the creation of plethora of datasets requiring expert annotators . |
| Approach: | They propose to use multi-task learning to unify different datasets and train a single model for them. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architectures yield better parsing accuracies and composition generalization than single-task models. |
Multilingual Extraction and Categorization of Lexical Collocations with Graph-aware Transformers (2022.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | lexical collocations exhibit varying degrees of frozenness due to their varying degree of frozenncy. |
| Approach: | They propose a sequence tagging BERT-based model enhanced with a graph-aware transformer architecture and evaluate the task of collocation recognition in context. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model encoding syntactic dependencies is useful, and provides insights on differences in collocation typification in English, Spanish and French. |
Event Semantic Knowledge in Procedural Text Understanding (2023.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Annotators’ reliance on commonsense knowledge to annotate implicit state information is a challenge for entity state tracking. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for entity state tracking that incorporates commonsense entity-centric knowledge from ConceptNet into a BERT-based neural-symbolic architecture. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing models on the ProPara dataset and is domain-agnostic. |
Does Character-level Information Always Improve DRS-based Semantic Parsing? (2023.starsem-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | incorporating character-level information does not improve the performance in English and German, and is not sensitive to correct character order in Dutch. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate character-level representations into a neural semantic parser for Discourse Representation Structures and to test their performance using order of character sequences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed parser improves in English, German, Dutch, and Italian in four languages. |