RECONSIDER: Improved Re-Ranking using Span-Focused Cross-Attention for Open Domain Question Answering (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | State-of-the-art Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) models for Open-domain Question Answering (QA) achieve high recall amongst top few predictions, but low overall accuracy, motivating the need for answer re-ranking. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to make answer re-ranking successful for span-extraction tasks even beyond large pre-training. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach achieves 45.5% Exact Match accuracy on Natural Questions and 61.7% on TriviaQA. |
Similar Papers
Enhancing Pre-Trained Generative Language Models with Question Attended Span Extraction on Machine Reading Comprehension (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Extractive Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is a challenging field in the field of Natural Language Processing. |
| Approach: | They propose a Question-Attended Span Extraction module to address the limitations of generative approaches for extractive machine reading comprehension (MRC) . module significantly enhances performance of pre-trained generative language models, enabling them to surpass the extractive capabilities of advanced Large Language Models (LLMs) |
| Outcome: | The QASE module surpasses state-of-the-art models in few-shot settings. |
Retrieving Support to Rank Answers in Open-Domain Question Answering (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a novel question answering architecture retrieves content relevant to the combined pair . previous work on automatic claim verification has shown hallucinations . |
| Approach: | They propose a question-answer architecture that prioritizes supporting evidence . it retrieves paragraphs that directly substantiate the correctness of a with respect to q . |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can be used by large language models to retrieve explanatory paragraphs that ground their reasoning. |
To Answer or Not To Answer? Improving Machine Reading Comprehension Model with Span-based Contrastive Learning (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models fail to recognize answerable questions due to subtle literal changes . MRC models are forced to perceive crucial semantic changes from slight literal differences. |
| Approach: | They propose a span-based method of Contrastive Learning which explicitly contrasts answerable questions with their answerable counterparts at the answer span level. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves baselines significantly and is an effective way to utilize generated questions. |
Training a Ranking Function for Open-Domain Question Answering (N18-4)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in machine reading have inspired researchers to combine Information Retrieval with machine reading to tackle open-domain QA. |
| Approach: | They propose two neural network rankers that assign scores to different passages based on their likelihood of containing the answer to a given question. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models achieve human level performance in open-domain QA compared to reading comprehension-style QA because it is difficult to retrieve the pieces of paragraphs that contain the answer to the question. |
Reader-Guided Passage Reranking for Open-Domain Question Answering (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current open-domain question answering systems follow a Retriever-Reader architecture . current systems do not use a reranker, which reranked passages based on top predictions of the reader . |
| Approach: | They propose a reader-guIDEd reranking method that reranked passages based on top predictions . they show that RIDER achieves 10 to 20 absolute gains in top-1 retrieval accuracy . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method achieves 10 to 20 gains in top-1 retrieval accuracy and 1 to 4 Exact Match gains without training. |
Retrieve, Read, Rerank: Towards End-to-End Multi-Document Reading Comprehension (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to answer reading comprehension tasks are inefficient since the input is re-encoded within each module. |
| Approach: | They propose a unified question answering model that combines context retrieving, reading comprehension, and answer reranking to predict the final answer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the baseline model and achieves state-of-the-art results on two versions of TriviaQA and two variants of SQuAD. |
You Only Need One Model for Open-domain Question Answering (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent approaches to Open-domain Question Answering use external knowledge bases, but have separate parameters and are weakly-coupled during training. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a single question answering model trained end-to-end to retrieve external knowledge and rerank passages with a separate reranked model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art model by 1.0 and 0.7 exact match scores on the Natural Questions and TriviaQA open datasets. |
R2-D2: A Modular Baseline for Open-Domain Question Answering (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using extractive and generative reader, we demonstrate its strength across three open-domain QA datasets: NaturalQuestions, TriviaQA and EfficientQA. |
| Approach: | They propose a four-stage open-domain QA pipeline with a retriever, passage reranker, extractive reader, generative reader and a mechanism that aggregates the final prediction from all system’s components. |
| Outcome: | The proposed pipeline outperforms state-of-the-art on three open-domain QA datasets and is twice as effective as the posterior averaging ensemble of the same models with different parameters. |
Expand, Rerank, and Retrieve: Query Reranking for Open-Domain Question Answering (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Empirically, EAR improves top-5/20 accuracy by 3-8 and 5-10 points . dense retrievers are limited by their inability to perform semantic matching for relevant passages that have low lexical overlap with the query. |
| Approach: | They propose a query expansion and reranking approach for improving passage retrieval with the application to open-domain question answering. |
| Outcome: | Empirically, EAR improves top-5/20 accuracy by 3-8 and 5-10 points when compared to a vanilla query expansion model and a dense retrieval model. |
Open-Domain Question Answering (2020.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge research in open-domain question answering (QA) |
| Approach: | tutorial provides a comprehensive overview of cutting-edge research in open-domain question answering . focus will shift to cutting- edge models proposed for open- domain QA . |
| Outcome: | The tutorial will cover cutting-edge research in open-domain question answering (QA) it will cover two-stage retriever-reader approaches, dense retriever and end-to-end training, and retriever free methods . |