Challenge: Moral sentiment is often motivated by its targets, which can correspond to individuals or collective entities.
Approach: They propose a model to predict moral attitudes towards entities and moral foundations jointly using tweets written by US politicians.
Outcome: The proposed model predicts moral attitudes towards entities and moral foundations jointly from tweets written by US politicians.

Similar Papers

Classification of Moral Foundations in Microblog Political Discourse (P18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a recent study shows correlation between political ideologies and moral foundations expressed in text . a moral foundation theory suggests that there are five basic moral values which underlie human moral perspectives .
Approach: They propose to model the moral foundations of tweets by using an annotation framework . they propose to use policy frames to predict the morality of political tweets .
Outcome: The proposed model can predict moral foundations of political tweets, the authors show . their model can be used to predict political slogans and political ideologies, they say .
Moral Framing in Politics (MFiP): A new resource and models for moral framing (2025.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent studies have focused on detecting moral values in political communication, trying to identify moral frames used by political actors or parties to convey their messages.
Approach: They propose to code German parliamentary debates to identify moral framing and to detect subtle differences in politicians’ moral framming.
Outcome: The proposed model distinguishes between different types of moral frames and includes narrative roles, together with the moral foundations for each frame.
Text-based inference of moral sentiment change (D19-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing work in NLP treats moral sentiment as a flat classification problem, but our framework probes moral sentiment change at multiple levels and captures moral dynamics concerning relevance, polarity, and finegrained categories informed by Moral Foundations Theory.
Approach: They propose a text-based framework that exploits implicit moral biases learned from diachronic word embeddings to probe moral sentiment change over a long historical period.
Outcome: The proposed framework supports inferences of historical shifts in moral sentiment toward concepts such as slavery and democracy over centuries at three incremental levels: moral relevance, moral polarity, and fine-grained moral dimensions.
The Moral Debater: A Study on the Computational Generation of Morally Framed Arguments (2022.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing arguments that focus on shared values are based on prior beliefs and morals, but little research has been done on the effectiveness of these proxies.
Approach: They propose a system that automatically generates arguments focusing on different morals and ask liberals and conservatives to evaluate the impact of these arguments.
Outcome: The proposed system generates arguments focusing on different morals, and the results are compared with existing arguments.
EMONA: Event-level Moral Opinions in News Articles (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent work on news articles has focused on social media short texts, but little has explored moral sentiment within news articles.
Approach: They propose to extract event-level moral opinions from news articles using a new dataset . they use annotated event-based moral opinions to analyze news articles .
Outcome: The proposed dataset consists of 400 news articles containing over 10k sentences and 45k events, among which 9,613 events received moral foundation labels.
An unsupervised framework for tracing textual sources of moral change (2021.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing studies on moral sentiment classification and temporal inference of moral sentiment have not quantified the origins of these changes.
Approach: They propose an unsupervised framework for tracing textual sources of moral change toward entities through time.
Outcome: The proposed framework captures fine-grained human moral judgments and identifies coherent source topics of moral change triggered by historical events.
That is Unacceptable: the Moral Foundations of Canceling (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Annotators' canceling attitudes are influenced by the type of controversial events and involved celebrities.
Approach: They propose to annotate canceling incidents from YouTube and an annotated corpus of videos that are based on their morality to determine their canceling attitudes.
Outcome: The dataset analyzes canceling attitudes of annotators from six videos and comments gathered from YouTube.
Cross-Domain Classification of Moral Values (2022.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods to identify moral values in text can be challenging for transferring knowledge between domains.
Approach: They compare a deep learning model with a domain-specific value classifier to find out whether it can transfer knowledge to new domains.
Outcome: The proposed model can generalize and transfer knowledge to novel domains, but introduce catastrophic forgetting.
Moral Foundations of Large Language Models (2024.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Moral foundations theory (MFT) is a psychological assessment tool that decomposes human moral reasoning into five factors, including care/harm, liberty/oppression, and sanctity/degradation.
Approach: They propose to use moral foundations theory to analyze whether popular LLMs have acquired a bias towards a particular set of moral values.
Outcome: The proposed model can be adversarially selected to exhibit a particular moral foundations and can affect downstream tasks.
Predicting the Topical Stance and Political Leaning of Media using Tweets (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for determining stances of media outlets and influential people are expensive.
Approach: They propose a method that uses unsupervised learning to ascertain the stance of Twitter users with respect to a polarizing topic by leveraging their retweet behavior.
Outcome: The proposed method achieves 82.6% accuracy compared to gold labels from the Media Bias/Fact Check website .

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations