Challenge: Evaluation metrics are a key ingredient for progress of text generation systems . a class of novel evaluation metrics based on BERT and its variants has been explored .
Approach: They propose to disentangle BERT-based evaluation metrics along linguistic factors . they show they are sensitive to lexical overlap, just like BLEU and ROUGE .
Outcome: The proposed metrics capture all aspects but are sensitive to lexical overlap, just like BLEU and ROUGE, the authors show .

Similar Papers

Tangled up in BLEU: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Automatic Machine Translation Evaluation Metrics (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for judging metrics are sensitive to the translations used for evaluation, leading to falsely confident conclusions about a metric’s efficacy.
Approach: They propose a method for thresholding performance improvement under an automatic metric against human judgements by using a pairwise system ranking method.
Outcome: The proposed method allows quantification of type I versus type II errors incurred, i.e., insignificant human differences in system quality that are accepted, and significant human differences that are rejected.
DEMETR: Diagnosing Evaluation Metrics for Translation (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: BLEU scores are based on string overlap, but they are opaque in comparison to newer learned metrics.
Approach: They propose a dataset to evaluate MT evaluation metrics based on linguistic perturbations in English . they find learned metrics perform substantially better than string-based metrics .
Outcome: The proposed dataset shows that learned metrics perform better than string-based metrics . the dataset contains 31K English examples that cover 35 different linguistic phenomena .
On the Blind Spots of Model-Based Evaluation Metrics for Text Generation (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for text generation evaluation metrics are lacking in robustness analysis.
Approach: They propose to use stress tests to test for errors in text generation evaluation metrics . they find that BERTScore is confused by truncation errors in summarization .
Outcome: The proposed stress tests show that they are insensitive to errors in open-ended generation, translation, and summarization.
Reproducibility Issues for BERT-based Evaluation Metrics (2022.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Reproducibility is of utmost concern in machine learning and natural language processing . lexical-overlap metrics are still the dominant metric in natural language generation .
Approach: They ask whether results and claims from four recent BERT-based evaluation metrics can be reproduced.
Outcome: The proposed metrics outperform the dominant metric, BLEU, and show that they can be reproduced.
A Study of Automatic Metrics for the Evaluation of Natural Language Explanations (2021.eacl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a lack of transparency is a key issue for robotics and AI.
Approach: They propose to map existing automatic evaluation methods for natural language generation onto explanations.
Outcome: The proposed model shows that embedding-based evaluation methods have higher correlations with human ratings than word-overlap metrics.
Beyond N-Grams: Rethinking Evaluation Metrics and Strategies for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: n-gram-based metrics are considered indicative (even if imperfect) of human evaluation for English, but their suitability for other languages remains unclear.
Approach: They systematically assess evaluation metrics for generation for languages and tasks using n-gram-based and neural-based metrics.
Outcome: The proposed evaluation suite is based on eight languages from four typological families and shows that it is sensitivity to the language type at hand.
Layer or Representation Space: What Makes BERT-based Evaluation Metrics Robust? (2022.coling-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent embedding-based evaluation metrics for text generation are based on measuring correlation with human evaluations on standard benchmarks.
Approach: They examine the robustness of BERTScore, one of the most popular embedding-based metrics for text generation.
Outcome: The embedding-based metrics that have the highest correlation with human evaluations on a standard benchmark can have the lowest correlation if the amount of input noise or unknown tokens increases.
A Tutorial on Evaluation Metrics used in Natural Language Generation (2021.naacl-tutorials)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field.
Approach: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state . it aims to assess the extent of scientific progress made and identify areas/components that need improvement .
Outcome: This tutorial presents the evolution of automatic evaluation metrics to their current state along with emerging trends in this field.
NLG Evaluation Metrics Beyond Correlation Analysis: An Empirical Metric Preference Checklist (2023.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: a systematic review of automatic evaluation metrics for Natural Language Generation (NLG) shows that task-agnostic metrics have a weak correlation with human .
Approach: They propose a framework to assess the effectiveness of automatic metrics in three NLG tasks . they propose task-agnostic and human-aligned metrics to be used for evaluation .
Outcome: The proposed framework provides access to the evaluation tools for three NLG tasks.
MENLI: Robust Evaluation Metrics from Natural Language Inference (2023.tacl-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Recent proposed BERT-based evaluation metrics for text generation are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, e.g., relating to information correctness.
Approach: They propose to use BERT-based evaluation metrics for text generation to evaluate text for semantic similarity but are vulnerable to adversarial attacks using Natural Language Inference.
Outcome: The proposed metrics outperform existing summarization metrics but perform below SOTA MT metrics on standard benchmarks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations