Exploring Transitivity in Neural NLI Models through Veridicality (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite recent success of deep neural networks in natural language processing, the extent to which they can demonstrate human-like generalization capacities remains unclear. |
| Approach: | They propose an analysis method to evaluate whether models can draw inferences composed of veridical inference and arbitrary inference types. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs poorly on transitivity inference tasks, suggesting it lacks generalization capacity for drawing composite inferences from training examples. |
Similar Papers
How well do NLI models capture verb veridicality? (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In natural language inference, contexts are considered veridical if they allow us to infer that their underlying propositions make true claims about the real world. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset for veridicality evaluation consisting of 1,500 sentence pairs, covering 137 unique verbs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model learns to make correct inferences about veridicality in verb-complement constructions. |
Do Neural Models Learn Systematicity of Monotonicity Inference in Natural Language? (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the success of language models using neural networks, it remains unclear to what extent neural models have the generalization ability to perform inferences. |
| Approach: | They propose a method to evaluate whether neural models can learn systematicity of monotonicity inference in natural language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows that neural models can perform inferences on unseen combinations of lexical and logical phenomena when syntactic structures are similar between training and test sets. |
Probing Linguistic Systematicity (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing evidence that deep natural language understanding models do not learn systematically is lacking. |
| Approach: | They examine whether deep natural language understanding models exhibit systematicity . they find that network architectures can generalize non-systematically . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model generalizes non-systematically, but is unsatisfactory, the authors argue . they show that the current state-of-the-art models do not generalize systematically . |
A synthetic data approach for domain generalization of NLI models (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Natural Language Inference (NLI) datasets are important benchmark tasks for LLMs . however, their realistic performance on out-of-distribution/domain data is less well-understood . a T5-small model trained with our data improves around 7% on average compared to the best alternative dataset . |
| Approach: | They propose a new approach for generating NLI data in diverse domains and lengths . they show that models trained on this data have the best generalization to completely new downstream test settings . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can be trained on datasets with high-quality examples with meaningful premises and high accuracy. |
The Learnability of Model-Theoretic Interpretation Functions in Artificial Neural Networks (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Entity vectors improve scores on basic event, while gated architectures benefit most. |
| Approach: | They extend entity-level semantic representations, modern architectures, principled competing event generation, extended systematicity tests and a two-dimensional difficulty analysis disaggregating results by modifier complexity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model-theoretic interpretation functions generalize systematically to out-of-training-sample sentences. |
Systematicity, Compositionality and Transitivity of Deep NLP Models: a Metamorphic Testing Perspective (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies focus on robustness-like metamorphic relations, which limit the scope of linguistic properties they can test. |
| Approach: | They propose three new classes of metamorphic relations which address the properties of systematicity, compositionality and transitivity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods show that metamorphic models do not always behave according to expected linguistic properties. |
Deep Learning for Natural Language Inference (N19-5)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial discusses cutting-edge research on NLI, including recent advance on dataset development, cutting- edge deep learning models, and highlights from recent research on using NLI to understand capabilities and limits of deep learning for language understanding and reasoning. |
| Approach: | This tutorial discusses cutting-edge research on NLI, including recent advance on dataset development and cutting- edge deep learning models. |
| Outcome: | This tutorial discusses cutting-edge research on NLI, including recent advance on dataset development, cutting- edge deep learning models, and highlights from recent research on using NLI to understand capabilities and limits of deep learning model for language understanding and reasoning. |
Deep Latent Variable Models of Natural Language (D18-3)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this tutorial, we will discuss the challenges of applying neural variational inference to NLP problems. |
| Approach: | The tutorial will cover deep latent variable models in the case where exact inference over the latent variables is tractable. |
| Outcome: | The proposed tutorial will cover deep latent variable models in the case where inference cannot be performed tractably and when it is not . |
Do Language Models Perform Generalizable Commonsense Inference? (2021.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has applied pretrained language models to populate commonsense knowledge graphs (CKGs) but there is a lack of understanding on their generalization to multiple CKGs, unseen relations, and novel entities. |
| Approach: | They analyze the ability of pretrained language models to perform generalizable commonsense inference in terms of knowledge capacity, transferability and induction. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can adapt to different schemas defined by multiple CKGs but fail to generalize to new relations. |
SETI: Systematicity Evaluation of Textual Inference (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing pre-trained language models (PLMs) have shown remarkable performance on this task, but little is known about their ability to address compositional generalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate pre-trained language models' systematicity in the domain of textual inference. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates pre-trained language models on six widely used PLMs. |