Bridging Textual and Tabular Data for Cross-Domain Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | BRIDGE is a powerful sequential architecture for cross-modal semantic parsing . BRidege captures cross-modal dependencies between natural language questions and relational databases . |
| Approach: | They propose a sequential architecture that captures cross-modal dependencies between questions and relational databases in cross-DB semantic parsing. |
| Outcome: | The proposed architecture performs well on the well-studied Spider benchmark (65.5% dev, 59.2% test). |
Similar Papers
A Tale of Two Linkings: Dynamically Gating between Schema Linking and Structural Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsing (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for text-to-SQL semantic parsing require strict structured prediction due to its application scenario where the output SQL will be sent to an executor program directly. |
| Approach: | They propose to use schema linking and structural linking to link NL to the database schema. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method shows significant gains on the Spider dataset. |
Cross-lingual Text-to-SQL Semantic Parsing with Representation Mixup (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Experimental results show that Rex can benefit from cross-lingual training and improve the effectiveness of semantic parsers. |
| Approach: | They propose a Representation Mixup Framework for effectively exploiting translations in the cross-lingual Text-to-SQL task. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework can benefit from cross-lingual training and improve the effectiveness of semantic parsers, achieving state-of-the-art performance. |
UCS-SQL: Uniting Content and Structure for Enhanced Semantic Bridging In Text-to-SQL (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Zhenhe Wu, Zhongqiu Li, JieZhangChinaTele JieZhangChinaTele, Zhongjiang He, Jian Yang, Yu Zhao, Ruiyu Fang, Bing Wang, Hongyan Xie, Shuangyong Song, Zhoujun Li
| Challenge: | Existing methods overlook the challenge of effectively transforming structure information from NL to SQL. |
| Approach: | They propose a text-to-SQL framework that unites content and structure pipes to bridge the gap between NL and SQL. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework bridges the gap between natural language questions and SQL by combining content and structure pipes. |
TaBERT: Pretraining for Joint Understanding of Textual and Tabular Data (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent years have witnessed the burgeoning of pretrained language models (LMs) for text-based natural language understanding tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a pretrained language model that jointly learns representations for NL sentences and (semi-)structured tables. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs best on the weakly-supervised semantic parsing benchmark WikiTableQuestions while performing competitively on the text-to-SQL dataset Spider. |
RAT-SQL: Relation-Aware Schema Encoding and Linking for Text-to-SQL Parsers (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing semantic parsing models struggle to generalize to unseen database schemas. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to address schema encoding, schema linking, and feature representation within a text-to-SQL encoder. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework boosts the match accuracy to 57.2% on the spider dataset, surpassing its best counterparts by 8.7%. |
Weaver: Interweaving SQL and LLM for Table Reasoning (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches that combine SQL and LLM rely on rigid workflows . Tables play a critical role across various domains such as finance, healthcare and scientific research . |
| Approach: | Weaver is a modular pipeline that integrates SQL and LLM for table-based question answering. |
| Outcome: | Weaver outperforms state-of-the-art methods on four Table QA datasets. |
Project-then-Transfer: Effective Two-stage Cross-lingual Transfer for Semantic Dependency Parsing (2021.eacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Several remarkable contributions have been made in syntactic dependency parsing, especially on universal dependencies. |
| Approach: | They propose to capture cross-linguality by combing annotation projection and model transfer of pre-trained language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model parser almost achieved the approximated upper bound. |
Dependency-based Hybrid Trees for Semantic Parsing (D18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing models for semantic parsing focus on structure-based models, but none deal with dependency information. |
| Approach: | They propose a dependency-based hybrid tree model which converts natural language utterances into machine interpretable meaning representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance across eight languages and is highly tractable inferenceable. |
DuoRAT: Towards Simpler Text-to-SQL Models (2021.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent text-to-SQL models can translate natural language questions to corresponding SQL queries on unseen databases. |
| Approach: | They propose a re-implementation of the RAT-SQL model that uses only relation-aware or vanilla transformers as the building blocks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on the spider dataset and shows it can be used on large databases without human intervention. |
SchemaGraphSQL: Efficient Schema Linking with Pathfinding Graph Algorithms for Text-to-SQL on Large-Scale Databases (2026.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
AmirHossein Safdarian, Milad Mohammadi, Ehsan Jahanbakhsh Bashirloo, Mona Shahamat Naderi, Heshaam Faili
| Challenge: | Text-to-SQL systems translate natural language questions into executable SQL queries. |
| Approach: | They propose a schema linking approach that first constructs a graph based on foreign key relations and then uses a single prompt to a lightweight LLM to extract source and destination tables from the user query. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms specialized, fine-tuned, and complex multi-step approaches on BIRD and Spider 2.0 benchmarks. |