Seq2Edits: Sequence Transduction Using Span-level Edit Operations (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Seq2Edits is an open-vocabulary approach to sequence editing for natural language processing tasks with a high degree of overlap between input and output texts. |
| Approach: | They propose an open-vocabulary approach to sequence editing for NLP tasks with a high degree of overlap between input and output texts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach speeds up inference by up to 5.2x compared to full sequence models . it improves explainability by associating each edit operation with a human-readable tag. |
Similar Papers
Text Generation with Text-Editing Models (2022.naacl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
Eric Malmi, Yue Dong, Jonathan Mallinson, Aleksandr Chuklin, Jakub Adamek, Daniil Mirylenka, Felix Stahlberg, Sebastian Krause, Shankar Kumar, Aliaksei Severyn
| Challenge: | Text-editing models are a popular alternative to seq2seq for monolingual text generation tasks such as text summarization and style transfer. |
| Approach: | They propose to use text-editing models to predict edit operations applied to the source sequence and to generate outputs word-by-word from scratch. |
| Outcome: | This paper provides an overview of the text-edit based models and their current state-of-the-art approaches. |
Reducing Sequence Length by Predicting Edit Spans with Large Language Models (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance in various tasks and gained significant attention. |
| Approach: | They propose to predict edit spans for local sequence transduction tasks by predicting edit span with a position of the source text and corrected tokens. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method reduces the length of the target sequence and the computational cost for inference by as small as 21%. |
Multi-pass Decoding for Grammatical Error Correction (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Seq2edit models decode only once without aware of subsequent tokens. |
| Approach: | They propose to iteratively refine the correction results of seq2seq models via Multi-Pass Decoding (MPD) to improve performance, but MPD increases inference costs . they propose to merge the source input and previous round correction result into one sequence. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on the CoNLL-14 and BEA-19 test set show that the proposed approach improves over baselines. |
Transforming Sequence Tagging Into A Seq2Seq Task (2022.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pretrained, large, generative language models have had great success in a wide range of sequence tagging and structured prediction tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a new format for casting input text sentences and their output labels into the input and target of a Seq2Seq model and introduce it to test their hypothesis. |
| Outcome: | The proposed format shows to be both simpler and more effective and devoid of hallucination. |
Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalization (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | despite success of sequence-to-sequence models, they fail in compositional generalization . a span-based parser that predicts a utterance over spans improves performance . |
| Approach: | They propose a span-based parser that predicts a utterance over a given span tree . they propose to use CKY to encode how partial programs compose over spans . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs better on random splits than baselines that require compositional generalization. |
Automatic Grammatical Error Correction for Sequence-to-sequence Text Generation: An Empirical Study (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Sequence-to-sequence (seq2sequ) models have a weakness: they cannot always generate sentences without grammatical errors. |
| Approach: | They propose to use automatic grammatical error correction to improve seq2seq models . they conduct experiments on machine translation, formality style transfer, sentence compression and simplification . |
| Outcome: | The proposed system can improve grammaticality of generated text and improve formal style tasks. |
FiD-Ex: Improving Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Extractive Rationale Generation (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained sequence to sequence models are effective in making and generating NL explanations, but they have many shortcomings. |
| Approach: | They propose a model that uses sentence markers to eliminate explanation fabrication . they use fusion-in-decoder architecture to handle long input contexts . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model significantly improves on the ERASER explainability benchmark. |
EdiT5: Semi-Autoregressive Text Editing with T5 Warm-Start (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained seq2seq models have established strong baselines for text-to-text transduction tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose a semi-autoregressive text-editing approach that combines the strengths of non-auto-regressively text- editing and autoregressive decoding. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is faster at inference times than conventional models while being capable of modeling flexible input-output transformations. |
Text Editing as Imitation Game (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text editing is an important domain of processing tasks to edit the text in a localized fashion, such as text simplification. |
| Approach: | They propose a nonautoregressive decoder for state-to-action demonstrations that parallels the decoding while retaining the dependencies between tokens. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the autoregressive baselines on a suite of Arithmetic Equation benchmarks in terms of performance, efficiency, and robustness. |
FELIX: Flexible Text Editing Through Tagging and Insertion (2020.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | FELIX is efficient in low-resource settings and fast at inference time, while being capable of modeling flexible input-output transformations. |
| Approach: | They propose a flexible text-editing approach that decomposes a text-generating task into two sub-tasks: tagging and insertion. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is efficient in low-resource settings and fast at inference time while being capable of modeling flexible input-output transformations. |