Lipschitz Constrained Parameter Initialization for Deep Transformers (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that deep Transformers have difficulty in training even with residual connection and layer normalization. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that leverages the Lipschitz constraint on the initialization of Transformer parameters to ease the optimization difficulties caused by its multi-layer encoder/decoder structure. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms previous RNN/CNN models but fails to converge with the original computation order. |
Similar Papers
Improving Deep Transformer with Depth-Scaled Initialization and Merged Attention (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to improve NLP convergence and computational overhead are limited by stacking more layers. |
| Approach: | They propose a depth-scaled initialization method which reduces parameter variance at initialization and reduces output variance of residual connections to ease gradient back-propagation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the base model on translation tasks with five translation directions while matching the decoding speed of the baseline model. |
Learning Deep Transformer Models for Machine Translation (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Neural machine translation models have advanced the previous state-of-the-art by learning mappings between sequences via neural networks and attention mechanisms. |
| Approach: | They propose to use layer normalization to pass the combination of previous layers to the next layer to improve the model. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the shallow Transformer-Big/Base baseline model on English-German and Chinese-English tasks by 0.4-2.4 BLEU points. |
B2T Connection: Serving Stability and Performance in Deep Transformers (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to prevent the vanishing gradient problem in deep neural networks are not effective. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that can equip both higher stability and effective training by a simple modification from Post-LN. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms Pre-LN and Post-Ln on a wide range of tasks. |
Optimizing Deeper Transformers on Small Datasets (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Peng Xu, Dhruv Kumar, Wei Yang, Wenjie Zi, Keyi Tang, Chenyang Huang, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, Simon J.D. Prince, Yanshuai Cao
| Challenge: | a common belief that training deep transformers from scratch requires large datasets is wrong . however, with proper initialization and optimization, the benefits of very deep transformer can carry over to challenging tasks with small datasets. |
| Approach: | They train 48 layers of transformers from pre-trained RoBERTa and 24 relation-aware layers from scratch. |
| Outcome: | The proposed scheme achieves state-of-the-art performance on a text-to-sql parsing benchmark . it uses 24 fine-tuned layers from pre-trained RoBERTa and 24 relation-aware layers from scratch . |
Rewiring the Transformer with Depth-Wise LSTMs (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Stacking non-linear layers allows deep neural networks to model complicated functions . but residual connections within each layer fail to fuse information from previous layers effectively . |
| Approach: | They propose a Transformer with depth-wise LSTMs connecting cascading Transformer layers and sub-layers. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves in English-German / French and multilingual tasks with BLEU. |
Understanding the Difficulty of Training Transformers (2020.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Admin (Adaptive model initialization) is more stable, converges faster, and leads to better performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a model initialization algorithm to stabilize early training and unleash its full potential in the late stage. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model initialization method stabilizes early training and unleashes full potential in late stage. |
Exploring Quantization for Efficient Pre-Training of Transformer Language Models (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Quantization has proven to be effective after pre-training and during fine-tuning, but its effects on pre-trainer performance have remained unexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a linear quantization strategy to be applied during the pre-training of Transformers to improve model efficiency and stability. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves model efficiency, stability, and performance while maintaining language modeling ability. |
Sneaking Syntax into Transformer Language Models with Tree Regularization (2025.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for incorporating syntactic inductive biases into transformers are limited . we introduce auxiliary loss function that converts bracketing decisions into differentiable orthogonality constraints on vector hidden states. |
| Approach: | They propose to introduce syntactic inductive biases into transformer circuits through a structured regularizer. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach could unlock more robust and data-efficient learning in transformer language models . it integrates seamlessly with the standard LM objective, requiring no architectural changes. |
Incorporating Residual and Normalization Layers into Analysis of Masked Language Models (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Transformer architecture is composed of multi-head attention, which has been extensively analyzed. |
| Approach: | They extended the scope of the analysis of Transformers from solely the attention patterns to the whole attention block, i.e., multi-head attention, residual connection, and layer normalization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method incorporates the whole attention block, i.e., multi-head attention, residual connection, and layer normalization into the analysis. |
Subformer: Exploring Weight Sharing for Parameter Efficiency in Generative Transformers (2021.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent improvements in NLP tasks can be attributed to the Transformer model. |
| Approach: | They propose to use parameter-sharing methods to reduce parameter budgets in generative models by using sandwich-style parameter sharing and self-attentive embedding factorization. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the current RNN model even with significantly fewer parameters. |