Papers with MIND-CA
Can vectors read minds better than experts? Comparing data augmentation strategies for the automated scoring of children’s mindreading ability (2021.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-domain experts are recruited to reannotate augmented samples and determine to what extent each strategy preserves the original rating. |
| Approach: | They implement 7 different data augmentation strategies for the task of automatic scoring of children’s ability to understand others’ thoughts, feelings, and desires. |
| Outcome: | The data augmentation strategies outperform task-agnostic augmentations and automatic augmentation systems perform worst on the MIND-CA corpus. |
“What is on your mind?” Automated Scoring of Mindreading in Childhood and Early Adolescence (2020.coling-main)
Copied to clipboard
Venelin Kovatchev, Phillip Smith, Mark Lee, Imogen Grumley Traynor, Irene Luque Aguilera, Rory Devine
| Challenge: | Existing studies show that children who excel at mindreading are more likely to be identified as popular by classmates and have reciprocated friendships. |
| Approach: | They propose to automate the scoring of mindreading ability in middle childhood and early adolescence using a new corpus of 11,311 question-answer pairs in English from 1,066 children aged from 7 to 14 . |
| Outcome: | The proposed scoring system is based on 11,311 question-answer pairs in English from 1,066 children aged from 7 to 14 . the results demonstrate the applicability of state-of-the-art NLP solutions to a new domain and task. |