Papers by Xing Jin

7 papers
Decentralized Arena: Towards Democratic and Scalable Automatic Evaluation of Language Models (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: closed-ended question-based benchmarks struggle with saturation as newer models emerge . crowd-sourced leaderboards rely on costly and slow human judges .
Approach: They propose a framework that leverages collective intelligence from all large language models to evaluate each other.
Outcome: a new framework enables a democratic, pairwise evaluation of all large language models . it achieves 97% correlation with human judgements, while significantly reducing the cost.
Flaming-hot Initiation with Regular Execution Sampling for Large Language Models (2025.findings-naacl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across various domains since the release of ChatGPT . a key challenge in developing these general capabilities is efficiently sourcing diverse, high-quality data.
Approach: They introduce Flaming-hot Initiation with Regular Execution (FIRE) sampling to efficiently find good responses by promoting diversity.
Outcome: The proposed method enhances inference-time generation quality and benefits training in the alignment stage.
GS-Quant: Granular Semantic and Generative Structural Quantization for Knowledge Graph Completion (2026.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing quantization-based approaches to knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) are incomplete.
Approach: They propose a framework that generates semantically coherent discrete codes for KG entities . they introduce a Granular Semantic Enhancement module that injects hierarchical knowledge into the codebook .
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms existing text-based and embedding-based baselines in the KGC domain.
MultiChallenge: A Realistic Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark Challenging to Frontier LLMs (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evaluation frameworks for large language models have limited coverage for multi-turn conversations . multi-turned conversations require accurate instruction following, context allocation, and in-context reasoning at the same time.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to conduct multi-turn conversations with humans.
Outcome: The proposed benchmarks achieve near perfect scores on existing benchmarks but only a 41.4% accuracy on the frontier models.
QuantAgents: Towards Multi-agent Financial System via Simulated Trading (2025.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing LLM-based agent models exhibit significant deviations from real-world fund companies.
Approach: They propose a multi-agent financial system that incorporates simulated trading . they propose simulated trades are evaluated without assuming actual risks .
Outcome: The proposed system evaluates various investment strategies without assuming actual risks without involving real-world investors.
Can AI Revise Research Papers with Human Review Feedback? An Empirical Study and Benchmark (2026.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are fundamentally reshaping the scientific landscape, transitioning the role of AI from passive tools to active partners within a new paradigm of Human-AI collaboration.
Approach: They propose a benchmark to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to improve papers with human feedback.
Outcome: The proposed benchmark tests the skills of Large Language Models (LLMs) on paper interpretation, experimental implementation, and paper formulation, using authors’ camera-ready versions as natural human baselines.
Tasty Burgers, Soggy Fries: Probing Aspect Robustness in Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing ABSA test sets cannot be used to distinguish the sentiment of the target aspect from the non-target aspect.
Approach: They propose a simple but effective approach to enrich ABSA test sets by disentangle the confounding sentiments of non-target aspects from the target aspect’s sentiment.
Outcome: The proposed model can distinguish the sentiment of the non-target aspects from the target aspect’s sentiment by using the Aspect Robustness Test Set (ARTS).

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations