Recognising Agreement and Disagreement between Stances with Reason Comparing Networks (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for (dis)agreement detection focus on conversational settings . however, non-dialogic stance-bearing utterances are common in real-world scenarios . |
| Approach: | They propose a reason comparing network to leverage reason information for stance comparison. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms baselines on a well-known stance corpus. |
Similar Papers
Automatic Stance Detection Using End-to-End Memory Networks (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for fact checking are tedious and often broken into intermediate steps to alleviate complexity. |
| Approach: | They propose an end-to-end memory network model that predicts whether a document can be considered relevant for a given claim and extracts relevant text snippets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model predicts whether a document can be considered relevant for a given claim and extracts relevant text snippets to reason about the factuality of the target claim. |
Integrating Stance Detection and Fact Checking in a Unified Corpus (N18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for fact checking are not supported by existing datasets, which treat fact checking, document retrieval, source credibility, stance detection and rationale extraction as independent tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to implement automatic fact checking on an Arabic fact checking corpus, which is the first of its kind. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach is based on an Arabic fact checking corpus, the first of its kind. |
Can We Identify Stance without Target Arguments? A Study for Rumour Stance Classification (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing target-aware models underperform in cases where the context of the target is crucial. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to enhance reasoning with the targets and propose 'target-aware' models without awareness of the target. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework achieves state-of-the-art on two benchmark datasets. |
Contrastive Language Adaptation for Cross-Lingual Stance Detection (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Current approaches to fact-checking are time-consuming and tedious. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel approach which leverages labeled data in one language to identify relative perspective of a document with respect to a claim in a different target language. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach can deal with the challenge of limited labeled data in the target language. |
The Impact of Stance Object Type on the Quality of Stance Detection (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | stance is defined by Biber and Finegan as the expression of an author's standpoint and judgment towards a given proposition. |
| Approach: | They analyze the implied knowledge and judgments required when deciding the stance of a text towards each possible stance object type. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can infer the stance of a text towards any of the three stance object types, namely topics, claims, and frames of communication. |
STEntConv: Predicting Disagreement between Reddit Users with Stance Detection and a Signed Graph Convolutional Network (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to detect disagreements on social media platforms have focused on supplementing textual information with user network information, such as Twitter's following system, retweets and hashtags. |
| Approach: | They propose a method which builds a graph of users and named entities and trains a Signed Graph Convolutional Network to detect disagreement between comment and reply posts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model builds a graph of users and named entities weighted by stance and trains a Signed Graph Convolutional Network (SGCN) to detect disagreement between comment and reply posts. |
STANCY: Stance Classification Based on Consistency Cues (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has shown that stance classification is a critical step for information credibility and automated fact-checking. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural network model for stance classification leveraging BERT representations and augmenting them with a novel consistency constraint. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing methods on a Perspectrum dataset and shows that it is more accurate than existing methods. |
A Survey on Stance Detection for Mis- and Disinformation Identification (2022.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Understanding attitudes expressed in texts plays an important role in systems for detecting false information online, be it misinformation (unintentionally false) or disinformation (intentional false information). |
| Approach: | They examine the relationship between stance detection and mis- and disinformation detection online and examine the results of previous studies. |
| Outcome: | The proposed task is a component of fact-checking, rumour detection, and detecting previously fact- checked claims, and is compared with other related tasks such as argumentation mining and sentiment analysis. |
Target-Oriented Relation Alignment for Cross-Lingual Stance Detection (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on cross-lingual stance detection has ignored the inconsistency in the occurrences and distributions of targets between languages, which consequently degrades the performance of stance detector in low-resource languages. |
| Approach: | They propose a fine-grained method which considers both target-level associations and language-level alignments to learn the in-language and cross-language associations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method is compared with competing methods under variant settings and shows that it performs better in low-resource languages. |
Determining Relative Argument Specificity and Stance for Complex Argumentative Structures (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing work on claim specificity and stance has been limited to shallow arguments . a system that can determine the stance of claims employed in argumentation is not sufficient . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a dataset of manually curated argument trees to study claim specificity and stance in argumentation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed dataset consists of manually curated argument trees for 741 controversial topics covering 95,312 unique claims. |