| Challenge: | a large study of historical text normalization is done on eight languages . there is no consensus on the state-of-the-art approach to normalization . |
| Approach: | They present a large study of historical text normalization done on eight languages . they evaluate four different systems based on supervised learning on datasets from eight different languages based in the literature . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods are based on supervised learning and are available online. |
Similar Papers
Evaluating Historical Text Normalization Systems: How Well Do They Generalize? (N18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Historical text normalization systems aim to convert historical wordforms to their modern equivalents . many of these systems have been developed and tested on a single language . |
| Approach: | They propose to use a nave baseline system to evaluate historical text normalization systems . they show that the models generalize well to unseen words in tests on five languages . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models generalize well to unseen words on five languages, but provide no clear benefit over the nave baseline. |
Semi-supervised Contextual Historical Text Normalization (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Historical text normalization is the task of mapping historical word forms to their modern counterparts. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a generative normalization model to obtain contextualization from the target-side language model. |
| Outcome: | et al., 2018) show that the most effective approach reduces manual normalization time and manual training costs. |
Dialect-to-Standard Normalization: A Large-Scale Multilingual Evaluation (2023.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Text normalization is a range of tasks that consist in replacing non-standard spellings with their standard equivalents. |
| Approach: | They introduce dialect-to-standard normalization as a sentence-level character transduction task and provide a large-scale analysis of these methods. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs best for Finnish, Swiss German and Slovene while the pre-trained model using full sentences performs the best for Norwegian. |
An Evaluation of Neural Machine Translation Models on Historical Spelling Normalization (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we apply different NMT models to the problem of historical spelling normalization for five languages . we find that NMT model is much better than SMT in terms of character error rate . |
| Approach: | They propose to use NMT models to solve the problem of historical spelling normalization in five languages. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves historical spelling normalization for five languages. |
Comprehensive Evaluation on Lexical Normalization: Boundary-Aware Approaches for Unsegmented Languages (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Lexical normalization research has sought to tackle the challenge of processing informal expressions in user-generated text. |
| Approach: | They focus on Japanese normalization and developing methods based on state-of-the-art pre-trained models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods achieve high accuracy and efficiency across multiple evaluation perspectives. |
How Do Large Language Models Capture the Ever-changing World Knowledge? A Review of Recent Advances (2023.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) are impressive in solving tasks, but they can quickly be outdated after deployment. |
| Approach: | They provide a review of recent advances in aligning deployed large language models with the ever-changing world knowledge. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models can be used to perform various tasks directly through in-context learning or for further fine-tuning for domain-specific uses. |
A Systematic Survey and Critical Review on Evaluating Large Language Models: Challenges, Limitations, and Recommendations (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Sawsan Alqahtani, M Saiful Bari, Mizanur Rahman, Mohammad Abdullah Matin Khan, Haidar Khan, Israt Jahan, Amran Bhuiyan, Chee Wei Tan, Md Rizwan Parvez, Enamul Hoque, Shafiq Joty, Jimmy Huang
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention due to their capabilities in performing diverse tasks across domains. |
| Approach: | They review the primary challenges and limitations causing inconsistencies in evaluations . early models could generate coherent text but limited to simple tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed evaluations are reproducible, reliable, and robust. |
First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Models (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a new system trained on well over a trillion words smashes the state of the art by a margin previously thought impossible. |
| Approach: | They argue that disparities in scale are transient and researchers can work to reduce them . they argue that data, rather than hardware, is still a bottleneck for many applications . |
| Outcome: | a new system trained on well over a trillion words smashes the state of the art by a margin previously thought impossible. |
A Detailed Evaluation of Neural Sequence-to-Sequence Models for In-domain and Cross-domain Text Simplification (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Xu et al., 2016) show that a simple neural architecture can be efficiently used for in-domain and cross-domain text simplification. |
| Approach: | They evaluate neural sequence-to-sequence models for text simplification on Wikipedia and Newsela datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generalize across corpora and overcome challenges when tested on Wikipedia and Newsela datasets. |
MoNoise: A Multi-lingual and Easy-to-use Lexical Normalization Tool (P19-3)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In this paper, we demonstrate the online demo and command line interface of a lexical normalization system (MoNoise) for a variety of languages. |
| Approach: | They propose to bundle seven datasets in six languages to form a new benchmark and a novel evaluation metric which is particularly suitable for cross-dataset comparisons. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on the original word and features from the original language for each normalization candidate. |