Behavior Analysis of NLI Models: Uncovering the Influence of Three Factors on Robustness (N18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Currently, state-of-the-art models achieve impressive test set performance in the form of accuracy scores. |
| Approach: | They examine the models' robustness to semantically-valid alterations to the input data by identifying three factors and comparing their impact on three SNLI models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that they can generalise to new in-domain instances while also showing that they suffer from insensitivity to small but semantically significant alterations. |
Similar Papers
A Novel Metric for Measuring the Robustness of Large Language Models in Non-adversarial Scenarios (2024.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Using large language models, we evaluated their robustness on multiple datasets. |
| Approach: | They propose a new metric for assessing model robustness by empirical evaluation of several models on multiple datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed metric is based on a set of datasets that are constructed by introducing naturally-occurring, non-malicious perturbations or by generating semantically equivalent paraphrases of input questions or statements. |
Semantic Sensitivities and Inconsistent Predictions: Measuring the Fragility of NLI Models (2024.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have indicated that NLI models have an understanding of lexical and compositional semantics. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework to assess the extent of semantic sensitivity in NLI models . they use adversarially generated examples with minor semantics-preserving surface-form variations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework shows that NLI models struggle with minor variations requiring knowledge of compositional semantics . |
Whispers of Doubt Amidst Echoes of Triumph in NLP Robustness (2024.naacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to measure robustness are problematic, and out-of-domain evaluations are no longer relevant. |
| Approach: | They examine models of different sizes spanning different architectural choices and pretraining objectives. |
| Outcome: | The results show that not all out-of-domain tests provide insight into robustness . merely scaling models does not make them adequately robust . |
Measure and Improve Robustness in NLP Models: A Survey (2022.naacl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Despite the performance gains, NLP models are still fragile and brittle to out-of-domain data, adversarial attacks, or small perturbation to the input. |
| Approach: | They propose a survey of how to define, measure and improve robustness in NLP by connecting multiple definitions of robustness and identifying failures. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models are robust against unseen or challenging scenarios, but are still fragile and brittle to out-of-domain data and adversarial attacks. |
Methods for Estimating and Improving Robustness of Language Models (2022.naacl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models suffer from weak generalisation ability due to shallow textual relations over full semantic complexity of the problem. |
| Approach: | They propose to incorporate some of these measures into training objectives to enhance distributional robustness of LLMs. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform human models on complex tasks and outperformed other models on deep networks. |
Robustness and Adversarial Examples in Natural Language Processing (2021.emnlp-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial aims to raise awareness of practical concerns about NLP robustness . it aims at addressing the weaknesses of NLP systems when faced with adversarial inputs and data with a distribution shift . |
| Approach: | This tutorial aims to bring awareness of practical concerns about NLP robustness . it reviews recent studies on analyzing the weakness of NLP systems when facing adversarial inputs . |
| Outcome: | This tutorial aims to bring awareness of practical concerns about NLP robustness . it will examine the weaknesses of NLP systems when faced with adversarial inputs and data with a distribution shift . |
Interpreting the Robustness of Neural NLP Models to Textual Perturbations (2022.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Modern Natural Language Processing models are sensitive to input perturbations and their performance can decrease when applied to noisy data. |
| Approach: | They propose to explain the extent to which a model is affected by an unseen textual perturbation by the learnability of the perturbation. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is better at identifying a perturbation (higher learnability) but worse at ignoring it (lower robustness). |
Simple but Challenging: Natural Language Inference Models Fail on Simple Sentences (2022.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Natural language inference (NLI) tasks are difficult to perform on large datasets . a small number of simple sentences can improve model performance, authors say . |
| Approach: | They propose to use syntactically simple sentences to test the inference ability of NLI models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed set of simple sentences shows that the models fine-tuned on MNLI and SNLI perform poorly on Simple Pair. |
SCORE: Systematic COnsistency and Robustness Evaluation for Large Language Models (2025.naacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Typical evaluations of Large Language Models (LLMs) report a single accuracy metric per dataset, often derived from an optimized setup. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for non-adversarial evaluation of large language models that evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework evaluates models by repeatedly testing them on the same benchmarks in various setups to give a realistic estimate of their accuracy and consistency. |
Your Model is Overconfident, and Other Lies We Tell Ourselves (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Analyzing 29 models, we find that difficulty is not linear or monotonic. |
| Approach: | They examine the interplay and divergence among various metrics for assessing intrinsic difficulty, including annotator dissensus, training dynamics, and model confidence. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on 29 models on three datasets and analyzed by a linguistics team. |