Improving Evidence Detection by Leveraging Warrants (D19-66)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for extracting warrants from a corpus of arguments are lacking in argument detection.
Approach: They propose to extract multiple warrants from an existing corpus of arguments and then aggregate them . they show that the method needs to be improved, but that it can still improve evidence detection.
Outcome: The proposed method can improve the performance of evidence detection by analyzing arguments and aggregating them.

Similar Papers

The Argument Reasoning Comprehension Task: Identification and Reconstruction of Implicit Warrants (N18-1)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for analyzing warrants in natural language arguments are insufficient.
Approach: They propose a method for reconstructing warrants from news comments . they use a crowdsourcing process to obtain warrants for 2k authentic arguments .
Outcome: The proposed method will define a substantial step towards automatic warrant reconstruction.
Document-level Claim Extraction and Decontextualisation for Fact-Checking (2024.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for document-level claim extraction focus on identifying and extracting claims from individual sentences.
Approach: They propose a method for document-level claim extraction for fact-checking which aims to extract check-worthy claims from documents and decontextualise them so they can be understood out of context.
Outcome: The proposed method extracts check-worthy claims from documents and decontextualises them so they can be understood out of context.
Complex Claim Verification with Evidence Retrieved in the Wild (2024.naacl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Prior work makes simplifying assumptions in retrieval that depart from real-world use cases: no access to evidence, access to curated evidence, or access to published evidence after a claim was made.
Approach: They propose a pipeline to check claims using raw evidence from the web . they restrict their retriever to only search documents available prior to the claim's making .
Outcome: The proposed method is based on a political claim dataset and shows that the evidence summary produced by the system is reliable and relevant to answering key questions.
Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claims (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Lack of a standardized evaluation framework impedes assessment and comparison of claim extraction methods.
Approach: They propose a framework for evaluating claim extraction in the context of fact-checking . they also introduce Claimify, an LLM-based claim extraction method .
Outcome: The proposed evaluation framework outperforms existing methods in the evaluation of claim extraction methods.
Beyond Single-Event Extraction: Towards Efficient Document-Level Multi-Event Argument Extraction (2024.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: mainstream event argument extraction methods process each event in isolation, resulting in inefficient inference and ignoring correlations among multiple events.
Approach: They propose a multi-event argument argument extraction model which extracts arguments from all events simultaneously.
Outcome: The proposed model performs better on four public datasets while saving time.
Improving Evidence Retrieval for Automated Explainable Fact-Checking (2021.naacl-demos)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Automated fact-checking on a large scale is time consuming and intractable.
Approach: They propose a three-stage automated fact-checking system using evidence retrieval and selection methods to improve evidence recall in a noisy environment.
Outcome: The proposed system can verify open-domain claims using results from web search engines.
Hierarchical Evidence Set Modeling for Automated Fact Extraction and Verification (2020.emnlp-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing methods for fact extraction and verification combine all evidence sentences to produce redundant information.
Approach: They propose a framework to extract evidence sets and verify a claim to be supported, refuted or not enough info . they propose to encode and attend the claim and evidence sets at different levels of hierarchy .
Outcome: The proposed framework outperforms 7 state-of-the-art methods for fact extraction and verification.
Multi-hop Evidence Retrieval for Cross-document Relation Extraction (2023.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Relation Extraction (RE) is a task that seeks to identify the relation of entities described according to some context.
Approach: They propose a multi-hop evidence retrieval method based on evidence path mining and ranking to support cross-document relation extraction.
Outcome: The proposed method acquires cross-document evidence and boosts performance in both closed and open environments.
A Two-Step Approach for Implicit Event Argument Detection (2020.acl-main)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: et al., 2015) only consider local arguments in the same sentence of the event trigger.
Approach: They propose to decompose the implicit event argument detection task into two sub-problems . they propose to use argument head-word detection and head-to-span expansion to reduce the number of candidates.
Outcome: The proposed model achieves better performance than a strong sequence labeling baseline.
Evidence Retrieval for Fact Verification using Multi-stage Reranking (2024.findings-emnlp)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Existing evidence retrieval methods are limited by single-stage evidence extraction.
Approach: They propose to use a multi-stage reranking paradigm to enhance the fact verification process by increasing the recall of sentences by 7.85%, tables by 8.29% and cells by 3% compared to the current state-of-the-art.
Outcome: The proposed system outperforms state-of-the-art models and achieves a 93.63% recall rate for Wikipedia pages.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations