Bad Form: Comparing Context-Based and Form-Based Few-Shot Learning in Distributional Semantic Models (D19-61)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Word embeddings are an essential component of many natural language processing applications. |
| Approach: | They propose 3 new tasks to obtain higher-quality vectors for word embeddings . they use word forms in training data that are related to word forms themselves . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods improve the performance of both baseline and advanced models on 4 out of 6 tasks. |
Similar Papers
Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representations (L18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Pre-trained word representations are a building block of many Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning applications. |
| Approach: | They propose to combine known tricks and a set of publicly available pre-trained word vector representations to train high-quality representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform the current state of the art on a number of tasks while maintaining a high training speed to scale to massive amount of data. |
Constrained Language Models Yield Few-Shot Semantic Parsers (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Richard Shin, Christopher Lin, Sam Thomson, Charles Chen, Subhro Roy, Emmanouil Antonios Platanios, Adam Pauls, Dan Klein, Jason Eisner, Benjamin Van Durme
| Challenge: | Large pretrained language models excel at generating natural language, but they are not efficient for task specific semantic parsing. |
| Approach: | They propose to use large pretrained language models as few-shot semantic parsers . they paraphrase inputs into a controlled sublanguage resembling English . |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generate surprisingly accurate models on multiple tasks with minimal code and data. |
Comparing Static and Contextual Distributional Semantic Models on Intrinsic Tasks: An Evaluation on Mandarin Chinese Datasets (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Distributional Semantics has undergone significant changes with the introduction of contextualized distributional models. |
| Approach: | They compare static and contextual distributional models for Mandarin Chinese . they find that static models are stronger for some of the classical tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform better on some of the classical tasks that consider word meaning independent of context, while contextualized models excel in identifying semantic relations between word pairs and categorization of words into abstract semantic classes. |
Using dependency parsing for few-shot learning in distributional semantics (2022.acl-srw)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for few-shot learning use dependency parsing information to learn meaning of rare words based on limited amount of context sentences. |
| Approach: | They propose dependency parsing for few-shot learning to learn meaning of rare words . they use word embedding models as background spaces for few shot learning . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods enhance the additive baseline model by using dependencies. |
What’s in Your Embedding, And How It Predicts Task Performance (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Attempts to find a single technique for general-purpose intrinsic evaluation of word embeddings have so far not been successful. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that quantifies interpretable characteristics of word vector neighborhoods and shows how they correlate with performance on 14 extrinsic and intrinsic task datasets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach enables multi-faceted evaluation, parameter search, and generally – a more principled, hypothesis-driven approach to development of distributional semantic representations. |
Building Static Embeddings from Contextual Ones: Is It Useful for Building Distributional Thesauri? (2022.lrec-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | contextual language models are dominant in the field of Natural Language Processing, but they are not suitable for all uses. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for building word or type-level embeddings from contextual models . they evaluate a large set of English nouns from the perspective of extracting semantic similarity relations . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can be used to build word or type embeddings from contextual models . it can be exploited for a wide set of English nouns, showing it can improve distributional thesauri . |
Word and Document Embedding with vMF-Mixture Priors on Context Word Vectors (P19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Word embedding models typically learn two types of vectors: target word vectors and context word vector. |
| Approach: | They propose to explicitly impose a cluster structure on context word vectors to improve word embedding models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves word embedding models qualitatively by imposing a cluster structure on the set of context word vectors. |
WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representations (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing word embeddings cannot model the dynamic nature of words’ semantics, i.e., the property of words to correspond to potentially different meanings. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale Word in Context dataset, called WiC, which is curated by experts and can be used to evaluate context-sensitive representations. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models outperform the standard evaluation dataset for the purpose and highlight their shortcomings. |
One Size Does Not Fit All: Comparing NMT Representations of Different Granularities (N19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has shown that contextualized word representations are a viable alternative to simple word prediction tasks. |
| Approach: | They propose to use subword units and characters to model morphology, syntax, and semantics instead of word embeddings. |
| Outcome: | The proposed representations are better for modeling syntax and more robust to noisy input. |
Contextual Embeddings: When Are They Worth It? (2020.acl-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In recent years, rich contextual embeddings have enabled rapid progress on benchmarks like GLUE, but require significant computational resources during pretraining and during downstream task training and inference. |
| Approach: | They empirically compare contextual embeddings with classic pretrained embedders and a random word embeddable with a simple baseline. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform within 5 to 10% accuracy on industry-scale data. |