RotBench: Evaluating Multi-modal Large Language Models on Identifying Image Rotation (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can identify the orientation of input images rotated 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270°. |
| Approach: | They propose a manually-filtered benchmark to evaluate MLLMs' ability to accurately identify rotation in input images. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model improves on the 'rotational cues' of 360° and 180° images, but not 90° and 270° rotations. |
Similar Papers
AlignMMBench: Evaluating Chinese Multimodal Alignment in Large Vision-Language Models (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on basic abilities using nonverbal methods, such as yes-no and multiple-choice questions. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that provides more nuanced evaluations of alignment capabilities for large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) they use a rule-calibrated evaluator that exceeds GPT-4's evaluation ability and a “alignment score” to assess the robustness and stability of models across diverse prompts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers 13 tasks across three categories and includes both single-turn and multi-turn dialogue scenarios. |
AesBiasBench: Evaluating Bias and Alignment in Multimodal Language Models for Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models are increasingly used in Personalized Image Aesthetic Assessment (PIAA) however, their predictions may reflect subtle biases influenced by demographic factors such as gender, age, and education. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate MLLMs along two complementary dimensions: (1) stereotype bias and (2) alignment between model outputs and genuine human aesthetic preferences. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark covers three subtasks: aesthetic perception, assessment, empathy and alignment between outputs and genuine human aesthetic preferences. |
MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images (2024.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
Haowei Liu, Xi Zhang, Haiyang Xu, Yaya Shi, Chaoya Jiang, Ming Yan, Ji Zhang, Fei Huang, Chunfeng Yuan, Bing Li, Weiming Hu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks and MLLMs focus on single-image input scenarios, leaving performance of ML models when handling multiple images underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate fine-grained abilities of multimodal large language models in multi-image scenarios. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: MII, MKS and MIC. |
MANBench: Is Your Multimodal Model Smarter than Human? (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have been gaining popularity in multimodal tasks . a bilingual benchmark is available for MLLM users to evaluate their multimodal capabilities . |
| Approach: | They propose a bilingual multimodal ability norms benchmark that measures multimodality across nine tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark compared human performance against state-of-the-art MLLMs. |
Tiny Scales, Great Challenges: The Limits of Multimodal LLMs in Scale Recognition (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on a single type of quantity or a specific format, lacking a comprehensive evaluation of scale recognition capabilities. |
| Approach: | They propose a visual scale recognition benchmark built using images from COCO, Open Images, and Flickr to evaluate scale recognition capabilities of multimodal large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model achieves 42.60% accuracy, lower than the 97.40% of humans. |
GODBench: A Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Models in Video Comment Art (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Yiming Lei, Chenkai Zhang, Zeming Liu, Haitao Leng, ShaoGuo Liu, Tingting Gao, Qingjie Liu, Yunhong Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for video comment art are constrained by their limited modalities and insufficient categories, hindering creativity in video-based comment art creation. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that integrates video and text modalities to evaluate MLLMs’ abilities to compose video Comment art. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework integrates video and text modalities to evaluate MLLMs’ abilities to compose video comment art. |
Multimodal Large Language Models for Text-rich Image Understanding: A Comprehensive Review (2025.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Pei Fu, Tongkun Guan, Zining Wang, Zhentao Guo, Chen Duan, Hao Sun, Boming Chen, Qianyi Jiang, Jiayao Ma, Kai Zhou, Junfeng Luo
| Challenge: | Recent advances in vision-language models have unified perception and understanding tasks within Visual Question Answering paradigms. |
| Approach: | They propose to outline timeline, architecture, and pipeline of nearly all TIU MLLMs and review their performance on mainstream benchmarks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models perform well on mainstream benchmarks and are compared with other models. |
How Do LLMs and VLMs Understand Viewpoint Rotation Without Vision? An Interpretability Study (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Zhen Yang, Ping Jian, Zhongbin Guo, Zuming Zhang, Chengzhi Li, Yonghong Deng, Xinyue Zhang, Wenpeng Lu
| Challenge: | Existing studies on spatial intelligence from the perspective of visual-spatial intelligence have not explored whether visual intelligence alone is sufficient to endow models with spatial intelligence. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a linguistic perspective to investigate spatial intelligence from a theoretical perspective. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model performs poorly on the proposed dataset while human can easily achieve 100% accuracy. |
Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning over Image Sequences (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Xiyao Wang, Yuhang Zhou, Xiaoyu Liu, Hongjin Lu, Yuancheng Xu, Feihong He, Jaehong Yoon, Taixi Lu, Fuxiao Liu, Gedas Bertasius, Mohit Bansal, Huaxiu Yao, Furong Huang
| Challenge: | Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated proficiency in handling a variety of visual-language tasks, but their ability to extrapolate from image sequences has been less investigated. |
| Approach: | They propose a new benchmark to assess MLLMs’ sequential image reasoning abilities. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark features 4,761 diverse image sequences with varying lengths. |
Textual Steering Vectors Can Improve Visual Understanding in Multimodal Large Language Models (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Woody Haosheng Gan, Deqing Fu, Julian Asilis, Ollie Liu, Vatsal Sharan, Robin Jia, Willie Neiswanger
| Challenge: | Steering methods have emerged as effective tools for guiding large language models’ behavior, yet multimodal large language model lacks comparable techniques due to architectural diversity and limited availability of multimodal steering vectors. |
| Approach: | They validate steering vectors derived solely from text-only LLM backbones and use a cross-modal transfer technique to reuse existing interpretability tools. |
| Outcome: | The proposed steering vectors can guide and enhance multimodal models using SPAR, Mean Shift, and Linear Probing. |