Personality Editing for Language Models through Adjusting Self-Referential Queries (2026.eacl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are integral to conversational agents and content creation, but they lack robustness and require large-scale training data to achieve significant improvements in personality alignment. |
| Approach: | They propose a method that introduces adjustment queries where self-referential statements grounded in psychological constructs are treated analogously to factual knowledge to enable direct editing of personality-related responses. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method improves personality alignment across personality dimensions and requires only 12 editing samples to achieve significant improvements. |
Similar Papers
Personality Vector: Modulating Personality of Large Language Models by Model Merging (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods to induce personality in large language models (LLMs) fail to capture the continuous nature of human traits. |
| Approach: | They propose a method for personality modulation in large language models by model merging by subtracting weights of pre-trained models from those of fine-tuned models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method allows LLMs to exhibit desired personality traits without additional training. |
Modeling, Evaluating, and Embodying Personality in LLMs: A Survey (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Iago Alves Brito, Julia Soares Dollis, Fernanda Bufon Färber, Pedro Schindler Freire Brasil Ribeiro, Rafael Teixeira Sousa, Arlindo Rodrigues Galvão Filho
| Challenge: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Approach: | This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the LLM-driven personality scenario. |
| Outcome: | The proposed taxonomy analyzes the limitations of existing methods and identifies key research gaps. |
PersonaLLM: Investigating the Ability of Large Language Models to Express Personality Traits (2024.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have shown that LLMs can generate content that aligns with their assigned personality traits, but there is limited research on whether they consistently reflect specific personality traits. |
| Approach: | They propose to study the behavior of LLM-based agents which they refer to as LLM personas and simulate them to measure their personality traits. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is based on the Big Five personality model and has been validated by human evaluations and automatic evaluations. |
Can LLMs Express Personality Across Cultures? Introducing CulturalPersonas for Evaluating Trait Alignment (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent studies have explored personality evaluation of LLMs, but they largely overlook the interplay between culture and personality. |
| Approach: | They propose a large-scale benchmark for evaluating LLMs’ personality expression in culturally grounded, behaviorally rich contexts. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark improves alignment with country-specific human personality distributions and elicits more expressive, culturally coherent outputs compared to existing benchmarks. |
BIG5-CHAT: Shaping LLM Personalities Through Training on Human-Grounded Data (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing methods for embedding human personality traits into LLMs are limited by realism and validity issues. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large-scale dataset to embed human personality traits into LLMs . they use supervised fine-tuning and direct preference optimization to train LLM models . |
| Outcome: | The proposed methods outperform prompting on personality assessments and IPIP-NEO, and show higher conscientiousness, agreeableness, lower extraversion, and lower neuroticism on reasoning tasks. |
ExPerT: Personalizing LLM Responses to Users’ Domain Expertise via Query-Wise Semantic and Keystroke Behavioral Cues (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing personalization methods relying on static profiles or text-only signals fail to capture query-specific expertise variation. |
| Approach: | They propose a query-wise personalization framework that adapts LLM responses to query domain expertise by combining semantic and behavioral cues. |
| Outcome: | ExPerT reduces expertise inference error by 65.7% compared to the strongest baseline and improves response satisfaction by 17.52% on a 5-point Likert scale. |
Exploring the Impact of Personality Traits on LLM Toxicity and Bias (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | anthropomorphic LLMs are being developed to serve diversified roles, but content safety concerns remain regarding their toxicity and toxicity. |
| Approach: | They propose to assign personality traits to large language models (LLMs) to reduce toxic language and social biases in their outputs by using the widely accepted HEXACO personality framework developed in social psychology. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is able to perform on three toxic and bias benchmarks and shows that assigning personality traits reduces bias and toxicity similar to humans’ correlations between personality traits and toxic behaviors. |
DPN-LE: Dual Personality Neuron Localization and Editing for Large Language Models (2026.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
Lifan Zheng, Xue Yang, Jiawei Chen, Chenyan WU, Jingyuan Zhang, Fanheng Kong, Xinyi Zeng, Xiang Chen, Yu Tian
| Challenge: | Current methods for editing personality traits in large language models can change personalities but reduce performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a novel paradigm for personality editing that locates and edits LLM neurons and enables competitive personality control at inference time. |
| Outcome: | Experiments on LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-7B-instruct show that the proposed approach can improve performance and improve performance. |
P4: Plug-and-Play Discrete Prompting for Large Language Models Personalization (2024.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive capabilities in following instructions, but manually prompting them to exhibit certain personalities may result in sub-optimal performance. |
| Approach: | They propose a plug-and-play prompting method to manipulate Large Language Models with distinct human-like personality traits by appending discrete personalized suffixes to query or dialog histories and focusing exclusively on influential tokens. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms other prompting methods and model editing methods on four models ranging from 1.1B to 13B and achieves 79.9% accuracy in customizing LLMs’ personalities. |
Dissecting Human and LLM Preferences (2024.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | a recent study shows that human and Large Language Model preferences are important for model fine-tuning and evaluation. |
| Approach: | They dissect the preferences of human and 32 different Large Language Models to understand their quantitative composition. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model is compared with 32 different large language models using real-world user-model conversations. |