Beyond IVR: Benchmarking Customer Support LLM Agents for Business-Adherence (2026.eacl-industry)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on tool usage or task completion, overlooking an agent’s capacity to adhere to multi-step policies, navigate task dependencies, and remain robust to unpredictable user or environment behavior. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to assess policy-aware agents in customer support using a dynamic-prompt agent and a static-promped agent that explicitly models policy control. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark assesses agent's ability to adhere to multi-step policies, navigate task dependencies, and remain robust to unpredictable user or environment behavior. |
Similar Papers
GuideBench: Benchmarking Domain-Oriented Guideline Following for LLM Agents (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Large language models (LLMs) have been widely deployed as autonomous agents capable of following user instructions and making decisions in real-world applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate LLMs' ability to follow domain-oriented guidelines . they evaluate Lms on three critical aspects: adherence to diverse rules, robustness to rule updates . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark evaluates LLMs on three critical aspects: adherence to diverse rules, robustness to rule updates, and alignment with human preferences. |
AgencyBench: Benchmarking the Frontiers of Autonomous Agents in 1M-Token Real-World Contexts (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Keyu Li, Junhao Shi, Yang Xiao, Mohan Jiang, Jie Sun, Yunze Wu, Dayuan Fu, Shijie Xia, Xiaojie Cai, Tianze Xu, Weiye Si, Wenjie Li, Dequan Wang, Pengfei Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on single agentic capability, failing to capture long-horizon real-world scenarios. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that evaluates 6 agentic capabilities across 32 real-world scenarios. |
| Outcome: | Experiments show that closed-source models outperform open-source model (48.4% vs 32.1%) integrating models with advanced scaffolds to form autonomous agents is a paradigm shift. |
VoiceBench: Benchmarking LLM-Based Voice Assistants (2026.tacl-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled real-time speech interactions through LLMs. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark specifically designed to assess LLM-based voice assistants. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark measures the performance of LLM-based voice assistants across eight tasks. |
TelAgentBench: A Multi-faceted Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based Agents in Telecommunications (2025.emnlp-industry)
Copied to clipboard
Sunwoo Lee, Daseong Jang, Dhammiko Arya, Gyoung-eun Han, Injee Song, SaeRom Kim, Sangjin Kim, Seojin Lee, Seokyoung Hong, Sereimony Sek, Seung-Mo Cho, Sohee Park, Sungbin Yoon, Wonbeom Jang, Eric Davis
| Challenge: | Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming powerful agentic systems . generic benchmarks fail to assess realistic, non-English performance . |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate five core agentic capabilities: Reasoning, Planning, Action (tool-use), Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Instruction Following. |
| Outcome: | The evaluations reveal significant performance disparities between models that employ explicit reasoning and those that do not. |
Can LLMs Help You at Work? A Sandbox for Evaluating LLM Agents in Enterprise Environments (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Enterprise systems are crucial for enhancing productivity and strategic growth, but data is fragmented across multiple sources and access controls are complex. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark that simulates enterprise settings with 500 diverse tasks . they show that even the most capable models achieve only 41.8% task completion . |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmark shows that even the most capable models achieve only 41.8% task completion. |
Analyzing and Internalizing Complex Policy Documents for LLM Agents (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Jiateng Liu, Zhenhailong Wang, Xiaojiang Huang, Yingjie Li, Xiang Li, Chenlei Guo, Xing Fan, Ruhi Sarikaya, Heng Ji
| Challenge: | Large language model agents rely on in-context policy documents to act as effective user assistants. |
| Approach: | They propose an agentic benchmark generator with Controllable Complexity in agent policy across four levels to evaluate agents under increasing complexity. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method outperforms the baseline in data-sparse and high-complexity settings. |
CAR-bench: Evaluating the Consistency and Limit-Awareness of LLM Agents under Real-World Uncertainty (2026.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents focus on task completion under idealistic settings but overlook reliability in real-world, user-facing applications. |
| Approach: | They propose a benchmark to evaluate consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain. |
| Outcome: | The proposed benchmarks evaluate consistency, uncertainty handling, and capability awareness in multi-turn, tool-using LLM agents in an in-car assistant domain. |
MMAU: A Holistic Benchmark of Agent Capabilities Across Diverse Domains (2025.findings-naacl)
Copied to clipboard
Guoli Yin, Haoping Bai, Shuang Ma, Feng Nan, Yanchao Sun, Zhaoyang Xu, Shen Ma, Jiarui Lu, Xiang Kong, Aonan Zhang, Dian Ang Yap, Yizhe Zhang, Karsten Ahnert, Vik Kamath, Mathias Berglund, Dominic Walsh, Tobias Gindele, Juergen Wiest, Zhengfeng Lai, Xiaoming Simon Wang, Jiulong Shan, Meng Cao, Ruoming Pang, Zirui Wang
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks focus on specific application scenarios, emphasizing task completion but failing to dissect the underlying skills that drive these outcomes. |
| Approach: | They propose a Massive Multitask Agent Understanding benchmark that evaluates LLMs across five domains and offline tasks. |
| Outcome: | The Massive Multitask Agent Understanding (MMAU) benchmark evaluates models across five domains including Tool-use, Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) QA, Data Science and Machine Learning coding, Contest-level programming and Mathematics. |
ACEBench: A Comprehensive Evaluation of LLM Tool Usage (2025.findings-emnlp)
Copied to clipboard
Chen Chen, Xinlong Hao, Weiwen Liu, Xu Huang, Xingshan Zeng, Shuai Yu, Dexun Li, Yuefeng Huang, Xiangcheng Liu, Wang Xinzhi, Wu Liu
| Challenge: | Existing benchmarks for evaluating LLMs’ tool usage face several limitations: limited evaluation scenarios, lacking assessments in real multi-turn dialogue contexts; narrow evaluation dimensions, with insufficient detailed assessments of how LLM use tools; and reliance on LLM or real API executions for evaluation, which introduces significant overhead. |
| Approach: | ACEBench is a benchmark for evaluating tool usage in Large Language Models . it categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
| Outcome: | ACEBench categorizes data into three primary types based on evaluation methodology: Normal, Special, and Agent. |
INVESTORBENCH: A Benchmark for Financial Decision-Making Tasks with LLM-based Agent (2025.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
Haohang Li, Yupeng Cao, Yangyang Yu, Shashidhar Reddy Javaji, Zhiyang Deng, Yueru He, Yuechen Jiang, Zining Zhu, K.p. Subbalakshmi, Jimin Huang, Lingfei Qian, Xueqing Peng, Jordan W. Suchow, Qianqian Xie
| Challenge: | Recent advances have underscored the potential of large language model (LLM)-based agents in financial decision-making. |
| Approach: | They propose to evaluate LLM agents using 13 different LLMs as backbone models across various market environments and tasks. |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework assesses the reasoning and decision-making capabilities of 13 different LLMs across various market environments and tasks. |